TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

Fighter_35

Contributor
Messages
543
Reactions
1 739
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
This is just HGK-84. There are 83,82 etc. and then there are KGK and LGK those guys also have 84,83,82 etc. Total inventory is well over 10k and production capacity is huge probably the best in Europe by far.
Still not enough, considering the depletion of munitions in ukranian war.
We should have atleast 30k air to ground guided missiles. Since we also have UAVs at the moment and they are also able to carry most of the munitions.
We should count 100 missiles per day and we should have at least missile storage for a year. And if we include any spare missiles for any likely storage blow ups, we need to add 10 percent more.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,343
Reactions
79 10,730
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
On a side note, I just wanna say- Even with unguided shells, Ukrainian artillery units when using digital fire control system (of Western delivered SPH) delivered accurate first round close proximity hits on vehicles/artillery position of the russian army countless times.
Saturation is still king. Modern SPHs can send 3 shots to a target in 20+ seconds. Excalibur is an amazing weapon, and it's great to have it on your arsenal. The ability to build these guidance kits in bulk, for cheap is just as important as a capability and probably a greater tool in actual war. If I remember right, Roketsan's kit is also made for 105mm rounds as well. We need ever more guns now, more than we already have. A small number of modern SPGs does not cut it, as we've seen.
 

Dmr

Active member
Messages
139
Reactions
1 344
Nation of residence
Macedonia
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Saturation is still king. Modern SPHs can send 3 shots to a target in 20+ seconds. Excalibur is an amazing weapon, and it's great to have it on your arsenal. The ability to build these guidance kits in bulk, for cheap is just as important as a capability and probably a greater tool in actual war. If I remember right, Roketsan's kit is also made for 105mm rounds as well. We need ever more guns now, more than we already have. A small number of modern SPGs does not cut it, as we've seen.
After Russia,Turkey has the highest number of artillery pieces in Europe if I am not wrong.With Yavuz/Arpan or whatever the name of the wheeled 155mm howitzer is,one would expect that number to be even higher.
 

Merzifonlu

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
716
Reactions
25 2,154
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Can't we develop a hybrid guided artillery rocket fired from the 155mm Howitzer barrel, for pinpoint strikes? I inspired by rockets fired from a tank barrel. (LAHAT)

Since it will accelerate gradually, the time of arrival at the target will be more or less the same as with conventional artillery munitions.
 
Last edited:

CAN_TR

Contributor
Messages
1,474
Reactions
17 5,211
Nation of residence
Austria
Nation of origin
Turkey
One M982 Excalibur shell costs more than 100k USD. That is not cost efficient, no matter how precise it is rather invest more in TRG 122/230/300. Something like M1156 PGK from Northrop makes way more sense for us and it's good that MKE is going that path.

The war in Ukraine is the perfect example how effective even dumb shells can be with modern fire control systems and "drone guidance", so i'd rather prefer cheaper "less accurate" guidance kits we can mass produce over something like Excalibur. Nice to have but you can do without it.
 

YeşilVatan

Contributor
Messages
668
Reactions
16 1,690
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Is it possible to shoot the shells in with different angles, therefore making them hit the target in near-simultaneous intervals? With a CEP of 50 metres, that would practically means a successful hit %99 of the time. Or better yet, shoot as a battery. I don't believe we'll get beyond the excalibur's 100k value even if we shoot 5 shells per target. Then again, I might be wrong.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Can't we develop a hybrid guided artillery rocket fired from the 155mm Howitzer barrel, for pinpoint strikes? I inspired by rockets fired from a tank barrel. (LAHAT)

Since it will accelerate gradually, the time of arrival at the target will be more or less the same as with conventional artillery munitions.
Wouldn't be better putting rocket launcher on tracked vehicles.?

Due-to longe range strike capacity, TRG-300 doesn't require maneuverable tracked vehicles.
But AFAIK we don't have any tracked 122mmMRLS .
 

Heartbang

Experienced member
Messages
2,556
Reactions
8 3,972
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Is it possible to shoot the shells in with different angles, therefore making them hit the target in near-simultaneous intervals?
Its called "Multiple round simultaneous impact", and several SPH systems have that feature, with K9 Thunder included amongst them:)
 

Merzifonlu

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
716
Reactions
25 2,154
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Wouldn't be better putting rocket launcher on tracked vehicles.?
We cannot leave our barreled artillery without ammunition against time-critical opportunity targets. I thinking about that task.

Okay, we will have SAL guided artillery shells, but they should also have INS+IIR guided artillery rockets like Tanok.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We cannot leave our barreled artillery without ammunition against time-critical opportunity targets. I thinking about that task.

Okay, we will have SAL guided artillery shells, but they should also have INS+IIR guided artillery rockets like Tanok.
Regarding time-critical concerns, MRLS is best solution. You could deploy tracked or wheeled MRLS with your towed or Self propelled howitzers together. Not a big deal.

1690839847157.png

İmagine as if this were next to Fırtına howitzer.



1690842909595.png

Unimog based Valkyrie MK1 was the answer Soviets Grad.
Turkish Army has also a lot of Unimogs. Could Turkish defense industry transform those unmanned MRLS?


 
Last edited:

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,751
Reactions
94 9,073
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Is it possible to shoot the shells in with different angles, therefore making them hit the target in near-simultaneous intervals? With a CEP of 50 metres, that would practically means a successful hit %99 of the time. Or better yet, shoot as a battery. I don't believe we'll get beyond the excalibur's 100k value even if we shoot 5 shells per target. Then again, I might be wrong.

Although @Heartbang already explained it, here are some detailed visual representations of MRSI against fixed targets.
(Same tactic can be and is employed against advancing enemy formations with desirable effect as Ukraine war showed us countless times)

 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,343
Reactions
79 10,730
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
After Russia,Turkey has the highest number of artillery pieces in Europe if I am not wrong.With Yavuz/Arpan or whatever the name of the wheeled 155mm howitzer is,one would expect that number to be even higher.
This is true, but an absolute majority of them are old, and lack the new tech we have that makes the life of an artilleryman easy. There are efforts to modernize them, like Aselsan's modernization solutions for 60, 81 and 120mm mortars and these are now being inducted into the service. Just that we need more, so much more. 105mm Boran replacing old 105mm guns, further motorizing 155mm Panters to Arpan, building 155mm Fırtına Block 2s, modernizing old guns with fire control systems are all part of a whole. Saturation with more accurate firing solutions is the bigger king.
 

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
734
Reactions
51 3,280
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Concerning artilary shells we need them all

-Ordinary artilary shells with +150 m Cep
-artiiary shells with Basic guidance kits with 50 m Cep
-artilary shells with laser Guadiance kit with <10 m
-artilary shells with INS+GPS < 10 m

For last two guess they are not an easy task dont know tip of an artilary shell should be not the best spot to place delicate electronics and actuators for instance the initial velocity of Excalibur is 827 m/s

MKE is not the old MKE and has done excellent jobs recently but IMHO the last two types of artilary guidance systems are not their field

note:

1690887200734.png
1690887449255.png

MKE solution looks very similar to M1156 Precision Guidance Kit with exact CEP value of 50 m and it is safe to assume that MKE's PGK should be using GPS as well.

1690887529001.png


1690887637752.png


1690888037006.png


https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2008/fuze/VABurke.pdf
 
Last edited:

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
3,931
Reactions
5 4,136
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Imagine if you get hit by this bullet No matter where you get hited. The high impact can cause a heart attack. And you could die.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Ebabil| High Speed Bullet


I would just ask:)
What the hell is Ebabil ammunition technology. 105mm tank ammunition can't destroy 1x1x1 mcub concrete blocks but this waste the blocks.


Ebabil 57mm recoilless rifle ammunition could penetrate 2 concrete walls!

Put 6/8 recoilless gun onto unmanned ground vehicle, you would have tank destroyer with those crazy Ebabil ammunition!
 

zio

Well-known member
Messages
392
Reactions
7 539
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Please do no

I would just ask:)
What the hell is Ebabil ammunition technology. 105mm tank ammunition can't destroy 1x1x1 mcub concrete blocks but this waste the blocks.


Ebabil 57mm recoilless rifle ammunition could penetrate 2 concrete walls!

Put 6/8 recoilless gun onto unmanned ground vehicle, you would have tank destroyer with those crazy

It makes me confuse…just made a trial with same ammo and same gun without it and with ebabil to the same target and show the difference.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom