• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,968
Reactions
61 5,303
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I had no idea that a Turk came up with this idea. I wonder if the Turkish government is working on something similar; it will be a shame if the US adopts it but not Turkey.

In the other forum, 10 Years ago we already had shared this opinion before he proposed. Kinda Poormens B1lancers.

Personally me shared boeing747 cruise missile launcher.
hgf3kip57c221.jpg

There was a beloved " Hurşid "guy if someone remembers😁
 

KhanOfEurasia

Contributor
Messages
552
Reactions
6 1,249
Website
strategicreviewturkey.blogspot.com
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Germany
I am not aware of a same concept in development in Turkiye.

Well, it is known that TSK doesn't like to be an innovator or the "first to". While there are bad sides of this there is also a logical explanation and this is the already low defence budget.

Turkiye doesn't have the almost unlimited budget the US haves and this is why every development and acquisition is planned very specifically without much room for experimenting and especially taking in account that we should play with expensive cruise missiles, cargo planes and release systems... I don't see this happening anytime soon :confused:.

Also there is something in this concept that is not compatible with the way the Turkish Air Forces operate. We already have extremely overstretched and aging cargo fleet and I am not sure if we have the luxury to sacrifice logistics capacity in order to use a cargo plane in this specific role. This is why we bid on higher count of unmanned platforms (unmanned) that will be able to fire such weapons from standoff ranges.


For a Regional Strike Capabillity, Cruise Missiles and Hypersonic Cruise Missiles can be deployed on Trucks, without scarificing Airlift Capabillity. Not to forget on Surface Ships and Submarines.
 

KhanOfEurasia

Contributor
Messages
552
Reactions
6 1,249
Website
strategicreviewturkey.blogspot.com
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Germany

I_Love_F16

Contributor
France Correspondent
Messages
932
Reactions
18 2,004
Nation of residence
France
Nation of origin
France
It seems to be possible to go with Siper Product-2 a similar Way like with the XAIM-147b. These long-range BVR Missiles have the Capabillity to counter enemy high Value Assests like AWACS, MPA and Tankers.



Hehe, it reminds me the good old Phoenix missile.
 

valarmogu

Active member
Messages
45
Reactions
2 202
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Roketsan started mass production of the Çakır cruise missile.

Roketsan's Cruise Missile ÇAKIR, which can be launched from land, naval and, air platforms, is set to become a new force multiplier for armed forces with its state-of-the-art features and effective warhead.

Roketsan’s new Cruise Missile – can be launched from fixed and rotary-wing aircraft, Assault Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (AUAVs)/UCAVs, AUSVs, tactical wheeled vehicles and naval platforms, and offers operational versatility against land and surface targets. With a range of over 150 kilometers, ÇAKIR's targets include surface targets, land and surface targets close to shore, strategic land targets, field targets and, caves.

 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
5,139
Reactions
104 10,047
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,894
Solutions
1
Reactions
51 17,040
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The MTCR is not a treaty and does not impose any legally binding obligations on Partners (members). Rather, it is an informal political understanding among states that seek to limit the proliferation of missiles and missile technology.

It is non-binding for the US, but it might be binding for us depending on the situation. We don't want to risk getting into trouble so we limit the range of our missiles to 300 km for export versions.
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Moderator
Messages
5,291
Reactions
114 19,734
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
Guys, as most of you probably know I am closely observing the military operations of TSK in Iraq. Basically there is a very special situation there which is preventing our rapid advance and costs us lives and time. The special situation we are in is caused by the kilometers long, reinforced, specially built, technologically advanced tunnel networks. With the depth in which we are operating on Iraqi territory the tunnels become more and more advanced. Currently we are busy with some of these tunnels, tried countless solutions including airstrikes, large amounts of explosives detonated at the entry points, drilling trough the rocks so we can place explosives in vulnerable locations inside the tunnels, UGVs, whatever may come to your mind. The problem is that inside these tunnels there are probably enough supplies for the terrorists so they can last for years. For example are waiting for terrorists to come out of the Sida tunnel network for 1.5 years while they are fully encircled. The tunnels are also built in such a way that there are specially designed pressure rooms and ventilation holes that helps with the pressure that is caused by these explosions and our efforts are not effective so far.

The worst thing is that after we are done with the current place of our operations there is a terrorist camp called Gara which will have to be cleaned too and the situation there is even worst. This is the current center of PKK's operations from almost every point. Gara is a fortress!

Due to these challenges I've come to the conclusion that our defence industry should develop a modern, smart munition with similar or comparable performance to the notorious MOAB bomb. We are busy with a couple of tunnels for some years now and couldn't find a solution while this is only the trailer of what Gara may look like. I think a MOAB equivalent will come extremely handy in our fight against terrorism abroad. With the help of it we may have the chance to obliterate the PKK's infrastructure and fighting force not only in Zap, Metina and Hakurk where we are currently conducting combat operations, but also in Gara, Sinjar and Qandil.

We saw the performance MOAB showed against IS tunnel networks in Afghanistan. I think it was a good example of the potential this munition carries.

What do you guys think about this? What do you think are the challenges in front of us for developing a munition with a similar power? Is there a munition with comparable devastating effects in our inventory which we can guide precisely enough so it can strike a tunnel entry point and cause the tunnel to collapse?

*We've tried with every munition that can be dropped by an F-16 and is in our inventory.
 

Aqerdf

Active member
Messages
113
Reactions
5 270
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yep.

We have A400s, FOAB would be safer approach.

If we talking about deep big and secure mountain networks we also need it's penetrator brother too.

But in theory for encircled tunnels, nothing stops us from stockpiling tens of ton of ammonium nitrate with TNT on those entrances. It would be same thing with air-dropped MOAB/FOAB.

*If the area is cleaned, and together with air-bombs this also should be tried maybe.
 
Top Bottom