Last edited:
Latest Thread
I don't know what happened to my comment but whatever. You are mod after allI am putting my opinion too. How come you feel offended. Unless You think I am right.
You already put me in a box, pathetic.
I honestly don’t know. While all the others have fancy roles in movies. We don’t see anything about MIT.Guys, how much do you rate MIT with that of KGB, CIA, Mossad, MI 6 ,Abwehr etc?
I personally don't think it's comparable to some of the intelligence organizations you mentioned due to the fact that they are military intelligence services. In terms of spy networks and scale it can't be compared to the ones in the list but in terms of capabilities I think the personnel are highly trained and experienced. The spy networks are not so huge just because Turkey till 2016 didn't actually needed so sophisticated international network (post cold war). They concentrated the foreign intelligence in the countries that Turkish soldiers were present, Central Asia, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Balkans and Western Europe with highest priority of Iraq but biggest priority was given to counter-intelligence.Guys, how much do you rate MIT with that of KGB, CIA, Mossad, MI 6 ,Abwehr etc?
But they need our help urgently.MIT is the silent rising star in the world of Intelligence Organizations.
They proved it countless times the last couple years.
For what?But they need our help urgently.
INFORMATIONS.For what?
We the public can never really know for sure but my own personal impressions are: in terms of tradecraft, the KGB was the best. Abwehr was poor. MI6 was middle tier - effective against the Abwehr but they had high level, long term penetration by the KGB, and probably at least 1 prime minister was under the influence of the KGB. CIA has a huge amount of resources, but in terms of tradecraft similar to MI6. Mossad and Pakistan's ISI punch above their weight. MIT's predecessor was effective up to at least WW2 (apparently they somehow found out German high level strategic plans showing Germany wasn't going to invade Turkey, which allowed Turkey to stay neutral in WW2) but became less effective during the Cold War due to instability and maybe also the influence of the US. Recently it seems to be improving a lot.Guys, how much do you rate MIT with that of KGB, CIA, Mossad, MI 6 ,Abwehr etc?
We the public can never really know for sure but my own personal impressions are: in terms of tradecraft, the KGB was the best. Abwehr was poor. MI6 was middle tier - effective against the Abwehr but they had high level, long term penetration by the KGB, and probably at least 1 prime minister was under the influence of the KGB. CIA has a huge amount of resources, but in terms of tradecraft similar to MI6. Mossad and Pakistan's ISI punch above their weight. MIT's predecessor was effective up to at least WW2 (apparently they somehow found out German high level strategic plans showing Germany wasn't going to invade Turkey, which allowed Turkey to stay neutral in WW2) but became less effective during the Cold War due to instability and maybe also the influence of the US. Recently it seems to be improving a lot.
A great book I can recommend on this topic is Spy Wars, written by the CIA's ex chief of Soviet counterintelligence. Some mind blowing stuff in there.