So,what you are saying is that we need all 8 Istif class frigates for our navy?
There is the Black Sea also,not counting the Med(the rest can handle it for now)?
If ship to ship fighting is to be done, or naval forces are to be involved in closed seas, then smaller, more agile ones in more numbers will have the upper hand.
However, the latest naval skirmishes and warfare has shown us that in closed seas having ships of frigate sizes serve nothing more than “posturing”.
In real life these are just dead weights waiting to be sunk if you have the means. Check out one of the most powerful navies in the world. Stuck in the Black Sea ports. Trying to stop incoming killer drones, somehow helplessly.
We don’t really need such powerful ships for the Aegean, apart from carrying the flag in peace time. But for Mediterranean and further afield, we need all 8 and more in the form of heavier frigates.
Same for Black Sea. If push comes to shove then they may be used.
But logically with current technology levels, sailing in the Black Sea with a frigate is an invitation for drones like sugar for honey bees.
Instead of spending more money for ships in the Aegean or Black Sea, we should concentrate on longer range and anti radar versions of Kara Atmaca missiles and Typhoon block 4 that can hit moving sea targets.
UAVs like Aksungur flying and relaying positional information to these missiles are more valuable. UAVs that can fire CAKIR and Atmaca from stand off ranges are deadlier and cheaper than any frigate in such closed in seas are going to be..
Our USVs with 400+ km ranges will prove to be more of a deterrent than any frigate in the Aegean. STM500 submarines will be of more value in such seas.
But these are not expensive items to have any cream to skim off of. Will the upper management go for them?