I assure you that if Imamoglu isnt complicit, then the people would have rebelled on the streets. The fact that they didnt prove that Ekrem Imamoglu isnt as clean in the eyes of the people. I wont even get into the testimonies made by those close to Ekrem Imamoglu who explained how Imamoglu embezzeled money from the people just so that theybcan reduce their prison sentence
Are you going to talk about key people who literally reversed their testimonies? or the ones threatened? I guess not.
Murat Kapki: A businessperson who had previously benefited from effective remorse provisions; he retracted his earlier statements via a petition submitted to the court, claiming that prosecutors had made him sign fabricated statements with promises of release and that his spouse was freed only after he said what was demanded of him.
Vedat Şahin: An advertising executive and businessperson standing trial while in custody; he repudiated his statements made as a cooperating witness, asserting that he had been manipulated by certain individuals and lawyers while in prison, threatened with his spouse's arrest, and had given false statements under the influence of media reports.
Elif Güven: Public Relations Manager at Medya A.Ş.; she withdrew her status as a cooperating witness, stating that she did not know what "effective remorse" entailed and that she had been coerced into writing texts containing false information.
Şeyhmus Sarıboğa: Another defendant who had testified under effective remorse provisions; he declared his previous statements invalid, arguing that he had been subjected to pressure and that his free will had been manipulated.
And more on the way you are a clueless foreigner.