Latest Thread
It looks awesome!New CGI by Harshal Pal - in A2A configuration with 8 x NG-CCM (ASRAAM) and 6 x Astra Mk-3 Ramjet BVRAAM
View attachment 29823
Hello! I am new here.
I always wondered as to why we are not pursuing a possible N-AMCA for carrier ops. So could the main reason be the lack of additional lift generating surfaces such as LERX/LEVCON/canards in AMCA's current frozen configuration? I have heard that such control surfaces help control the aircraft's pitch rate when performing a jump at a certain AoA from a ski-jump.
I dont get it,why not the AMCA in 2032,wont the TEDBF be 4,5 gen?
Yikes, delayed again
I dont get it,why not the AMCA in 2032,wont the TEDBF be 4,5 gen?
It looks awesome!Some new poor quality images of TEDBF have emerged.
It looks like modified Rafale.
Even after IN indicating 5gen TEDBF, AFAIK there is no official response from ADA on it.
View attachment 75540
View attachment 75541 View attachment 75542
View attachment 75543
Some new poor quality images of TEDBF have emerged.
It looks like modified Rafale.
Even after IN indicating 5gen TEDBF, AFAIK there is no official response from ADA on it.
View attachment 75540
View attachment 75541 View attachment 75542
View attachment 75543
till TEDBF is approved by the govt, it’s an ppt project
Pointless to run two fighter jet programs in parallel with one being 5th gen and the other 4.5
Might as well consolidate the funds and use it for AMCA and N-AMCA