TR TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
734
Reactions
51 3,275
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
a true milestone for Turkish aviation industry, an industry which is still maturing around MMU. Quite frankly it can be considered as an exceptional case for the world aviation as well since for many arond the world TFX project was so unexpected and so unbelivable that they doubt it. Turkish industry has proved them wrong. We done it and we done it in our way. MMU is just starting its life journey and we still have far more things to do. I am looking forward for the extensive flight tests .... which may bring us many more suprises.
 

Siper>MMU

Contributor
Messages
542
Reactions
2 1,191
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
FrZ_TlkXgAESMZx


When planes are put next together one suddenly recognizes the differences.

TFx blk 0 has apparently no retractable aft wheels (we saw this also with drone prototypes)
These landing gears are temporary.
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,010
Reactions
8 3,624
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
These landing gears are temporary.
No I do not think so.

Blk 0 is a demonstrator, same like Baykar uses the kizilelma demonstrator prototype.

Landing gears on demonstrators are not the main point and are often fixed, to avoid accidents on that part.

The Blk 10 will become the first production ready prototype
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,463
Reactions
14 2,790
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Uh, according to my sources it is not temporary or non-functional. You can see that gear position is different compared to other aircraft. TF-X gear placement is more similar to F-15s. Panels fold back again
08.jpg
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,010
Reactions
8 3,624
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well the demonstrator is like the name says to demonstrate it is flyable. One can make all types of tests with weights added that represent radar, missiles etc.

A demonstrator is not a production ripe aircraft that can be used by the airforce. So yes there can be changes on the frame if needed.
 

zio

Well-known member
Messages
388
Reactions
7 534
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
There is a white cover on entry of inlet,I think she also. S type inlet air flow structure
 

Philip the Arab

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,344
Reactions
4 2,247
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Jordan
It’s a bit ugly but that may be camera angle or because it’s in early development. Congratulations nonetheless, this is a huge development.
 

MADDOG

Contributor
Türkiye Correspondent
Professional
Messages
1,218
Reactions
31 7,989
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Cyprus
The landing gear design may change as the aircraft hasn't gone through her CDR phase yet. However the landing gears are retractable.
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,260
Reactions
91 11,653
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
As reaffirmed in the prototype that will begin taxi tests, it has a much larger radar radome than comparable systems. In other words, the aircraft's combat capabilities are being discussed mostly in terms of internal weapon stations, but it seems that the main strategic aspect of the aircraft will be its electronic capabilities.
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,260
Reactions
91 11,653
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
It looks to me or cockpit area is little bulky comparing with its body ?! Or it will change after prototypes
Let me add a question to this issue: Could one of the reasons for this revision be the tandem weapon stations under fuselage?
 

DBdev

Committed member
Messages
298
Reactions
8 522
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
It’s a bit ugly but that may be camera angle or because it’s in early development. Congratulations nonetheless, this is a huge development.
Yeah you'd think so but unfortunately they are going the WRONG WAY!

They had a supreme looking model in the animation. They raised the cockpit ridicilously high, made cockpit glass
spherical, put vertical stabilizers that were supposed to partially hide nozzle heat signature on top of the engines thus increased the RCS and heat signature, added an ugly nonaerodynamic protruding nose camera...

And if you point out any mistakes you are a traitor... If you say keep going the wrong way you are a patriot. Go figure...


 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,382
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,804
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yeah you'd think so but unfortunately they are going the WRONG WAY!

They had a supreme looking model in the animation. They raised the cockpit ridicilously high, made cockpit glass
spherical, put vertical stabilizers that were supposed to partially hide nozzle heat signature on top of the engines thus increased the RCS and heat signature, added an ugly nonaerodynamic protruding nose camera...

And if you point out any mistakes you are a traitor... If you say keep going the wrong way you are a patriot. Go figure...


What are your credentials again? And, do you have access to information on the design that nobody else has?
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom