The law, "MAVI VATAN", in the light of International Law.
"The main arguments of the Turkish side are two.
1. Islands do not have the right to an EEZ and a continental shelf.
2. It is not possible for a huge, landlocked country like Turkey not to have corresponding maritime rights in the region.
The second argument resembles, not to say that it is exactly the same, as the logic of Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany, regarding "Living Space"!!! Of course, this goes against all common sense and of course every concept of international law.
Turkey's military mentality is governed by the certainty of victory. That is, it does NOT make any military move unless it is first certain that it will emerge victorious from it. Greater proof of what I am mentioning is its invasion of Iraq and Syria, which took place ONLY when these two states had disintegrated, see Iraq, or when they had a strong sense of Government instability, see Syria.
Turkey cannot claim that its maritime space is disproportionate to its land size, because it has accepted this fact by signing the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923."