According to the TRNC Council of Ministers decision taken on January 16, 2023, Geçitkale Airport was given to the Cyprus Turkish Peace Forces Command.
Thus, Turkey officially acquired the first air base in Cyprus.
I think the problem stems from ignorance.
I think the problem is we are too focused on Palestine that we dont bother looking into the wider problems of the Islamic World and the Turkic World.
I agree its so shameful not 1 Muslim country or a Turkic country visited the TRNC.
Lets not forget how Uzbekistan tried to distance itself from news about the Turkic council recognising TRNC.
Utter retarded affairs that boggles my mind.
It was already a military airport long ago, and recently they ban all civil aviation activities. Turkish Forces weirdly not had a airbase up until now, even no helicopters, as far as I know all helicopters operated by GKK. And regarding planes other than UAVs, it still does not word to station them there, economically not feasible.
According to the TRNC Council of Ministers decision taken on January 16, 2023, Geçitkale Airport was given to the Cyprus Turkish Peace Forces Command.
Thus, Turkey officially acquired the first air base in Cyprus.
Actually a political retreat further cements TRNC as a sovereign state, it is just 5 min flight from Turkiye in case of anything anyway. What is their biggest argument against us? so called "occupied" so that political retreat (but having an overseas base) would kill the argument. TRNC is a state, it is not occupied land. In many platforms they use two main arguments, the biggest one is properties of Greeks being confiscated (Now there is a court to compensate them) and the other one is the Turkish troops occupying the whole North, or claiming it an "occupied land" so IMO (as I always say) destroying these arguments that they are spreading to the world should be the first step if we want any state to recognize TRNC or support us on international arena, otherwise these guys use it for propaganda all the time. Public opinion and image is very important whereas "unfortunately" Turks are very bad at managing it.You're right, a token force is probably sufficient to keep on the island. The Greek side wouldnt dare to do anything, but politically it would be seen as a retreat, so not going to happen.
The fuck? I'm at a loss for words.Turkey promotes 'Islamization' and 'Turkification' in Northern Cyprus
So, does she meant they were christian and non Turk before?The fuck? I'm at a loss for words.
At this point she can claim that for clout. She's been thoroughly brainwashed by all this SJW/neo-commie bullshit propaganda.So, does she meant they were christian and non Turk before?
At this point she can claim that for clout. She's been thoroughly brainwashed by all this SJW/neo-commie bullshit propaganda.
Its time we call them for what they are. Mankurts.All those German politicians of Turkish descent are all pigs. Lets not forget Cem Ozdemir
So, does she meant they were christian and non Turk before?
Its time we call them for what they are. Mankurts.
(or T.I.N.O for uninitiated. )
A big reason many Hindu groups hate Turks today is for the exact same reason of Turkic rule over the Indian subcontinent. Of course they claim oppression and tyranny and what not, maybe their right but events that happened hundreds of years ago in another part of the world is used to tarnish Turks in their entirety today.
As much as I despise a lot of those groups, their consternation lies much more with Turkish military armament and cooperation with Pakistan....and from there it proceeds through their reductive thinking as it does globally when tribalism is involved.
It is why there is little to no ill will directed against where these Turkics (regd invasions and foreign dynasties of especially northern India) actually originated:
i.e Chagatai and some degree of Kipchak and Oghuz Turkmen w.r.t the Moghul dynasty and Mamluk dynasty preceding it (and number of smaller sultanates and such).
India has good to excellent relations with these central asian countries (Uzbek , Kazakh, Turkmen et al) given they first of all do not pick overt side in India's security neighbourhood like Turkiye has done (especially under AKP tenure).
It has decent enough relations with Persia too (i.e looking well past what folks like Turkoman Nadir Shah did, following right after Turkic Safavid dynasty own history with India prior which is longer story).
Again something that has far greater source of anger than could lie with Anatolian Turks far away (the ottoman navy would fight against the Portuguese in support of a local sultanate in Gujarat during Ottoman empire apex, that was about it).
If the Oghuz of Anatolia (Seljuk et al.) descendants follow same policy as the other Turkics (who intersect with Indian history far more greatly), there would be far less consternation from Hindu groups towards Turkiye nationstate today (especially with backdrop of Ataturk in its modern era).
Since the topic here is TRNC, I will just leave what Mr. Bulent Ecevit (who had his large part to play in the TRNC story) own connection was with India for example:
The Philosophy of Power (Published 1974)
C L Sulzberger article on Turkish Premier Bulent Ecevit examines philosophy of power in his acknowledgment of mil heroes Kemal Ataturk and Ismet Inonu as having both influenced him in his quest for power; says Ecevit's most admired book is collection of prison lrs from Pandit Nehru to his...www.nytimes.com
Obviously this is your perspective, And i understand where you coming from.As much as I despise a lot of those groups, their consternation lies much more with Turkish military armament and cooperation with Pakistan....and from there it proceeds through their reductive thinking as it does globally when tribalism is involved.
It is why there is little to no ill will directed against where these Turkics (regd invasions and foreign dynasties of especially northern India) actually originated:
i.e Chagatai and some degree of Kipchak and Oghuz Turkmen w.r.t the Moghul dynasty and Mamluk dynasty preceding it (and number of smaller sultanates and such).
India has good to excellent relations with these central asian countries (Uzbek , Kazakh, Turkmen et al) given they first of all do not pick overt side in India's security neighbourhood like Turkiye has done (especially under AKP tenure).
It has decent enough relations with Persia too (i.e looking well past what folks like Turkoman Nadir Shah did, following right after Turkic Safavid dynasty own history with India prior which is longer story).
Again something that has far greater source of anger than could lie with Anatolian Turks far away (the ottoman navy would fight against the Portuguese in support of a local sultanate in Gujarat during Ottoman empire apex, that was about it).
If the Oghuz of Anatolia (Seljuk et al.) descendants follow same policy as the other Turkics (who intersect with Indian history far more greatly), there would be far less consternation from Hindu groups towards Turkiye nationstate today (especially with backdrop of Ataturk in its modern era).
Since the topic here is TRNC, I will just leave what Mr. Bulent Ecevit (who had his large part to play in the TRNC story) own connection was with India for example:
The Philosophy of Power (Published 1974)
C L Sulzberger article on Turkish Premier Bulent Ecevit examines philosophy of power in his acknowledgment of mil heroes Kemal Ataturk and Ismet Inonu as having both influenced him in his quest for power; says Ecevit's most admired book is collection of prison lrs from Pandit Nehru to his...www.nytimes.com