TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

[zio]

There is assembley flaws on Akıncı as well but it is slow can be tolerated but on kızılelma it should not be,other than that it reduces stealth character also. I am on mix feeling

 

[Radonsider]

There is assembley flaws on Akıncı as well but it is slow can be tolerated but on kızılelma it should not be,other than that it reduces stealth character also. I am on mix feeling

Please don't worry, this is the first prototype, remember Akıncı PT01?

 

[MADDOG]

There is assembley flaws on Akıncı as well but it is slow can be tolerated but on kızılelma it should not be,other than that it reduces stealth character also. I am on mix feeling

It is a prototype

 

[Radonsider]

It is a prototype

Man I am worried now about TF-X prototype, even though it is better than Kızılelma someone will find a small flaw or whine about some testing equipment later on...

 

[Zafer]

“If you’re not failing, you’re not trying hard enough.”​

A few flaws here and there is the price of moving fast.

 

[dBSPL]

I don't want to bring here pictures of some aircraft prototypes with uneven rivet alignments or even burn stains. IMO, KE has a very good assembly cleanliness compared to many prototype. It is natural that we will also see many differences in subsequent aircrafts. This is part of the development process.

 

[MADDOG]

Man I am worried now about TF-X prototype, even though it is better than Kızılelma someone will find a small flaw or whine about some testing equipment later on...

I get that people are nervous when something is not fitted correctly or if a piece is dangling off the fuselage. But many often forget that there is a huge engineering team behind all of this. And like it or not they know these things better than all of us here. So complaining about pieces that don't fit properly, is illogical in my opinion.

Many also forget this... What if the radome is engineered to look like that? Baykar can surely produce radomes that fit. What makes KE so special? These are possibilities as well. Only time will tell, but let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

 

[GoatsMilk]

and a few assembly flaws. and too many removable parts for a fast jet. I would have expected a smoother body

View attachment 50616

Turks should know better, no other nations military developments are scrutinised and criticised as much as Turkish ones. Yep its a prototype and like prototypes of TB2 and Akinci before it there will be minor issues with prototype models, however why give the global critics of Turkey the opportunity?

 

[dBSPL]

 

[Radonsider]

my guess is an auxiliary air intake for high AoA manuevers in which normal intakes would not be able to supply air into the engine and would lead into stall, thus allowing aircraft to perform much tighter maneuvers


if not these, it could be an APU exhaust

 

[Huelague]

View attachment 50600 View attachment 50602
View attachment 50603
View attachment 50604

Maybe its my penchant for perfectionism, but all these screws and rivets maks my sick.

 

[MADDOG]

Maybe its my penchant for perfectionism, but all these screws and rivets maks my sick.

Kızılelma doesn't have that many rivets and screws. They're all just visible to the naked eye that's all lmao

 

[Radonsider]

Kızılelma doesn't have that many rivets and screws. They're all just visible to the naked eye that's all lmao

Bad aesthetic choice imo, why make chromish rivers when the aircraft is gray oof

 

[Cabatli_TR]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594399600353234944

 

[Enderun]

Baykar KIZILELMA I hope you enjoy my work.

 

[Cabatli_TR]

 

[Kedikesenfare]

US, Russian, Ukrainian and Azerbaijani sources are already started to cover this news,

Unmanned fighter jet Baykar Kızılelma running tests to prepare for the first flight​

Unmanned fighter jet Baykar Kızılelma running tests to prepare for the first flight - Technology Org

The unmanned fighter jet Baykar Kızılelma is conducting final tests before the first flight. These tests may look

www.technology.org

https://mezha.media/2022/11/20/bpla-baykar-bayraktar-kizilelma-3/

Турецкий беспилотник Kizilelma впервые вышел на взлетную полосу (видео)

Благодаря успешной серии испытаний, в Baykar надеются поднять в небо новейший БПЛА до конца 2022 года вместо начала 2023.

focus.ua

БПЛА Kizilelma випробували на аеродромі

Компанія Baykar переглянула терміни льотних випробувань реактивного безпілотника Bayraktar Kizilelma та провела тестове руління на злітній смузі.

mil.in.ua

Виробник Bayraktar випробовує новий безпілотник з українським "серцем" (відео)

У турецькій компанії відзначили, що новинка зможе вести повітряний бій.

www.unian.ua

Türkiyədə "Kızılelma" pilotsuz döyüş təyyarəsinin testləri uğurla tamamlanıb

Türkiyədə "Kızılelma" pilotsuz döyüş təyyarəsinin testləri uğurla tamamlanıb. Bu barədə Azərbaycan 24 ...

www.azerbaycan24.com

Турция успешно провела испытания первого беспилотного истребителя

В Турции завершились испытания первого турецкого беспилотного истребителя, об этом рассказали в пресс-службе компании Baykar. Ходовые испытания летательного аппарата Bayraktar KIZILELMA, успешно завершены, подчеркнули в компании. …

vestikavkaza.ru

Βίντεο: Το μη επανδρωμένο τουρκικό τζετ, Κizilelma, σε δοκιμές τροχοδρόμησης - Πτήση

Σύμφωνα με βίντεο που έδειξε στο Twitter ο Selcuk Bayraktar, τεχνικός διευθυντής της τουρκικής εταιρίας Baykar, το μη επανδρωμένο τζετ της, Kizilelma (το πρώην MIUS) κάνει ήδη δοκιμαστικές τροχοδρομήσεις! Το Kizilelma σύμφωνα με τον προγραμματισμό που έχει ανακοινωθεί, θα κάνει την πρώτη πτήση...

www.ptisidiastima.com

 

[Huelague]

and a few assembly flaws. and too many removable parts for a fast jet. I would have expected a smoother body

View attachment 50616

Thank you! It looks too soviet style in manufacturing issue.

 

[dBSPL]

Not for comparison, but in terms of how much the landing gear will change in the next(carrier capable) variants:

T-45 Goshawk - 80s/90s era
(2 seat carrier-capable trainer aircraft with 5,500 lbf engine and 13,000 lb MTOW)

MQ-25A Stingray (state-of art)
(Carrier-Based Unmanned Aerial-Refueling System with 10,000 lbf engine and over 40,000 lbs MTOW)

 

[Agha Sher]

Not for comparison, but in terms of how much the landing gear will change in the next veriants:

View attachment 50625

T-45 Goshawk - 80s/90s era
(2 seat carrier-capable trainer aircraft with 5,500 lbf engine and 13,000 lb MTOW)
View attachment 50626

MQ-25A Stingray Carrier-Based Aerial-Refueling System
View attachment 50627

I do not believe all versions of KE will be carrier capable. Especially not the initial prototypes.