Built quality has improved compared to the 1st prototype. However, still room for improvements
Latest Thread
Built quality has improved compared to the 1st prototype. However, still room for improvements
+ it has a lower profile, I. Demir hasn't mentioned of it but high likely Navy will get an elevator type storage for this boy and store more in a small space.The distance between the folding points is 0.45 times the total wingspan. This corresponds to a folded wing position width of approximately 6.3 meters. In addition, the main wing area, where there will be three ammunition racks, will be approximately 2 meters. Of course, this is only a rough calculation, but it gives an idea.
View attachment 55426
With a very rough calculation, this means that each TB-3 will occupy an area of 50-55 square meters in the TCG Anadolu hangars and deck sides.
link doesn't work
Doesn't it need more powerful landing gear?The distance between the folding points is 0.45 times the total wingspan. This corresponds to a folded wing position width of approximately 6.3 meters. In addition, the main wing area, where there will be three ammunition racks, will be approximately 2 meters. Of course, this is only a rough calculation, but it gives an idea.
View attachment 55426
With a very rough calculation, this means that each TB-3 will occupy an area of 50-55 square meters in the TCG Anadolu hangars and deck sides.
TB3 is pretty light.Doesn't it need more powerful landing gear?
for carrier based ops It need sturdy and big landing gear thoTB3 is pretty light.
Those would be in the landing gears.any hooks for catapult launches?
Looks like they don't yeah It needs to have stronger landing gear.You can tell all of that by just looking at a picture, while experienced engineers who model, simulate and design them have no clue. Right!
It'll have 130 kg more payload than TB2, according to Baykar's website.More payload possible?
How do you know the landing gears are not strong enough?Looks like they don't yeah It needs to have stronger landing gear.
Also baykar doesn't have a history of making "naval" stuff for naval landings you need to have good landing gears.
How do you know the landing gears are not strong enough?
But do you know its specifications? You wanted counterarguments from Nutuk, so it is only fair that I want proper reasons from you.Does this look strong?