You mean Cezeri I guess but we don't see who is making it and much about what it looks like.Is the new version Akıncı?
Latest Thread
You mean Cezeri I guess but we don't see who is making it and much about what it looks like.Is the new version Akıncı?
I wished that he’ll have YF-23 style exhaust
I mean why do we keep calling it a prototype? It's obviously a mock-up. The engine is not installed, no panels, fuselage joints are non existent. There are huge gaps between the central fuselage and the wings that got installed recently. You could call it a "prototype development model". It isn't a prototype, I'm 90% positive on that one. Baykar followed the exact same path with the Akinci. Please enlighten me... Could we please clarify what is a prototype and what isn't? Because I'm getting lost here
I mean why do we keep calling it a prototype? It's obviously a mock-up. The engine is not installed, no panels, fuselage joints are non existent. There are huge gaps between the central fuselage and the wings that got installed recently. You could call it a "prototype development model". It isn't a prototype, I'm 90% positive on that one. Baykar followed the exact same path with the Akinci. Please enlighten me... Could we please clarify what is a prototype and what isn't? Because I'm getting lost here
Interesting. I assume a fairly large wind tunnel would be needed. You know, in order to accommodate this massive thing.They use this prototype for some tests like wind tunnel tests
I think the wing structure looks like AkıncıYou mean Cezeri I guess but we don't see who is making it and much about what it looks like.
Not every prototype has to be a flying prototype.I mean why do we keep calling it a prototype? It's obviously a mock-up. The engine is not installed, no panels, fuselage joints are non existent. There are huge gaps between the central fuselage and the wings that got installed recently. You could call it a "prototype development model". It isn't a prototype, I'm 90% positive on that one. Baykar followed the exact same path with the Akinci. Please enlighten me... Could we please clarify what is a prototype and what isn't? Because I'm getting lost here
Again the wing structure is typical to winged air taxis too.I think the wing structure looks like Akıncı
Great, but this also proves that it's something that terrorists can use/develop too. All our units must have automatic track and trace+shoot systems the smaller the better.Ostim Technical University Faculty Member Prof. Dr. Sinan Kıvrak and his students developed a multi rotor drone system that can carry 25 kilograms of load and releases one 81 and two 60 mortars.
AA
View attachment 41252
Wings are glued. I guess there is nothing to say moreThe most obvious reason for it being a prototype is the rear section, awaiting engine installation - there's even an hint of the yellow Zinc-Chromate primer top-side of that black tarp. I can go on about other things, previous history on how Akinci PT1 came about and how HizilElma is following suite (@TheInsider explained it already) in the same developmental style, but I'm sure it would just skim over certain individuals heads. Either way, not long left till we see this prototype start to do ground tests.
Wings are glued. I guess there is nothing to say more
And whats yours? Name calling members for different opinion? Whats the point of a forum when you can not accept the fact that not everyone agrees with you?schit posting is very much your calling isn't it ?
And whats yours? Name calling members for different opinion? Whats the point of a forum when you can not accept the fact that not everyone agrees with you?
There is a good reason to believe that this is either a mock up or a test model for wind tunnel but no way a working prototype.
Except you tell me that Bayraktar wants to build a drone made of composit materials thats traveling mach 1.
The tail section that you mentioned where the engine will be fit in would not be made of a thin composit.
Then dont act like one.Writes the person who quoted another member coined the term 'Fetocu' to pass it off as plausible reason to have differing views, what were you expecting to achieve - side-line me to some sort of AKP-Troll ?
And how many real world exsamples work without any flaps?There's plenty of real world examples of composite aircraft flying at mach speeds, suggest you look into it.
Then dont act like one.
And how many real world exsamples work without any flaps?