TB3 reaches an altitude of 33 thousand feet with PD170 engine
TB3 is next in the news at 40000 ft.
Latest Thread
TB3 reaches an altitude of 33 thousand feet with PD170 engine
Bayraktar TB3 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle successfully completed takeoff and landing tests on the TCG ANADOLU multi-purpose amphibious ship on April 22, 2025.
By Baykar posts of the last 3 days, after Anadolu's long visit to the shipyard was complete and she sailed again, in the last 3 days TB3 made at least 13 takeoffs from and landings to Anadolu.
Great tests and definitely essential before the next stage.
But proof of the pudding is in the eating, when it comes to take off and landing of the TB3 with full fuel and payload.
That is what will decide to put this bird apart from the other UAVs that have managed to take off and land on a much longer carriers like the Mojave.
Automated system, is clearly very good at avoiding the back lift during touch down. But with full load those few extra metres may be crucial for safe landing. Currently the plane has ample room for landing safely with plenty of runway to spare. But it has no ammo and we don’t know how much fuel it is carrying. We also don’t know how much the engine is being pushed to its limit during take off.
Personally I can’t wait to see this bird taking off and landing with full load. As far as I can see, we are ahead of all others in this race of operating UAVs from a carrier with a comparably short runway. Nice to keep the edge.
That's basically the standard and will be the operating standard unless it's an emergency.Also worthwhile to notice that all take-off are happening in headwind. Interesting to see if it can take off in non-windy/tailwind conditions.
Maybe, if the ship is going in reverse.Can the TB2 take off from and land on the helicopter deck of a warship?
Like how, doesn't make sense.
Ship speed doesn't matter, wind speed, more importantly wind speed under the wings matter. Ship superstructure blocking it will make the wind speed much slower. What's wrong with VTOL drones?Like how, doesn't make sense.
They lack payload capacity or range. A helicopter lacks range and endurance, Baykar DİHA lacks payload and it is unarmed. A TB2 with the new engine is allegedly capable of 300 kmh speed. It does not happen often but an Ada class or an Istif class ship for example, lets say one that is off the coast of Somalia or cruising in the Indian Ocean can have its own small air force against pirates or smugglers. It is a capability that you can use when you don't have supporting air assets. Speed boats have as much as 100 km so even they can be considered. If this can be done it will be an easy capability gain for the Navy.Ship speed doesn't matter, wind speed, more importantly wind speed under the wings matter. Ship superstructure blocking it will make the wind speed much slower. What's wrong with VTOL drones?
We'll still only have VTOL UAVs unless ship goes 60kmh in reverse.They lack payload capacity or range. A helicopter lacks range and endurance, Baykar DİHA lacks payload and it is unarmed. A TB2 with the new engine is allegedly capable of 300 kmh speed. It does not happen often but an Ada class or an Istif class ship for example, lets say one that is off the coast of Somalia or cruising in the Indian Ocean can have its own small air force against pirates or smugglers. It is a capability that you can use when you don't have supporting air assets. Speed boats have as much as 100 km so even they can be considered. If this can be done it will be an easy capability gain for the Navy.
I am saying plane catches up to the ship. What are you suggesting?unless ship goes 60kmh in reverse
Helicopters can be shot down easily. A plane expands the reach very much. With satcom or an AI autopilot you can reach thousands of kilometers. There can always be circumstances where you can use extra reach. Anyway, it is an easy capability to have.anti pirate or security missions you have a helicopter onboard