TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,828
Reactions
227 19,808
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
We still did not see the IWB in action, not bombs but it should fire cruisemissiles.
It is the most vital capability of this aircraft.
Since it is a Low Observable plane by nature, it has to make use of this trait. Carrying a couple of SOM-J missiles for stand off attack for heavier ships and up to 4 x CAKIR MrRAShM for lower weight naval targets should be within it’s munition carrying envelope.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
476
Reactions
7 838
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
It is the most vital capability of this aircraft.
Since it is a Low Observable plane by nature, it has to make use of this trait. Carrying a couple of SOM-J missiles for stand off attack for heavier ships and up to 4 x CAKIR MrRAShM for lower weight naval targets should be within it’s munition carrying envelope.
4 Cakir wouldn’t fit maybe 3 side by side
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,828
Reactions
227 19,808
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
4 Cakir wouldn’t fit maybe 3 side by side
4 x CAKIR may be not if side by side placement is the only way.
But SOM-J has a stowed width of 480mm.
CAKIR has a diameter of 275mm .
4 x 275 = 1100 mm
2 x 480 = 960 mm.
If they can find 15-20cm more width inside the IWB then it is possible (after all as we have full authority over the plane, it is up to Baykar engineers to see if they can find the space) .
But otherwise 3 x CAKIR is achievable as you pointed out.

1766923316654.png

1766923527624.jpeg

There is a lot of space there under its belly. I hope they have made it available to be used by the IWB s. When it has a 10000lbf engine it should have more MTOW capability too. Also wing area of KE is substantial, and should give it good amount of lift.

PS. Additionally, you don’t have to place missiles side by side. If space is available you may stack them on top of each other.
Also not to forget “sidekick” mechanism of f35-A and C versions.

1766925750654.jpeg
 
Last edited:

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,805
Solutions
1
Reactions
47 16,767
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Interesting how PT4 has not been seen for a very long time. PT5 and PT3 have been doing flights regularly.

Also, did PT5 get its stealth coating - seems more polished than before.
PT-5 has some stealth treatment, but it is still not the final product. You can see the serrated lines if you look upclose.

vyxFICZ-qVJer3lt.jpg
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
476
Reactions
7 838
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
4 x CAKIR may be not if side by side placement is the only way.
But SOM-J has a stowed width of 480mm.
CAKIR has a diameter of 275mm .
4 x 275 = 1100 mm
2 x 480 = 960 mm.
If they can find 15-20cm more width inside the IWB then it is possible (after all as we have full authority over the plane, it is up to Baykar engineers to see if they can find the space) .
But otherwise 3 x CAKIR is achievable as you pointed out.

View attachment 78817
View attachment 78818
There is a lot of space there under its belly. I hope they have made it available to be used by the IWB s. When it has a 10000lbf engine it should have more MTOW capability too. Also wing area of KE is substantial, and should give it good amount of lift.

PS. Additionally, you don’t have to place missiles side by side. If space is available you may stack them on top of each other.
Also not to forget “sidekick” mechanism of f35-A and C versions.

View attachment 78819
i think that last picture is edited if you look closely the missiles have all the same shadow
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,828
Reactions
227 19,808
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Last edited:

Ahlatshah

Active member
Messages
121
Reactions
13 497
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
- Within the scope of the Bayraktar KIZILELMA Unmanned Fighter Aircraft Project; our KIZILELMA Unmanned Fighter Aircraft communicated with each other via the Azra National Data Link (MDL) and executed patrol duties in a fully autonomous manner under swarm UAV command.

-During this mission, a close autonomous formation flight between unmanned fighter aircraft was successfully achieved for the first time in the world with two KIZILELMA approaching within approximately 15 meters of each other.


I wonder if this system could be applied to our F16s, at least Özgürs. I mean KE with sensors and AZRA datalink, can interact with flying F16s or not? If it is so, that is you know...The real footsteps of MUM-T
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom