Trump has picked retired general Kellog as his special envoy for the Ukraine-Russia war.
Half a year ago Kellog wrote the closest thing we have to a proposal for how a Trump admin will deal with Ukraine and Russia:
https://americafirstpolicy.com/issu...-u.s-assistance-as-of-day-231-of-the-invasion
It read mostly as a part of Trump's campaign, with Biden criticism sprinkled in anywhere possible, but is interesting nonetheless. Crucially though, while claiming that a Trump admin negotiates from a position of strength while maintaining Trump's unpredictable nature, its proposed
negotiating position included freezing the lines and delaying Ukraine in NATO. For placating Ukraine it mostly only offers that Ukraine does not have to formally agree to cede territory in a peace deal, and that a final settlement will likely come with a post-Putin Russia.
He wrote another
policy paper about Ukraine with John Ratcliffe, the upcoming CIA Director, which has views very similar to Mike Waltz's and Marco Rubio's; the US should stand with Ukraine, but Europe should be doing more, clear policy objectives should be stated, and without it aid should not be provided.
There was also an insightful
interview with him describing his vision for ending the war and criticism of Biden's approach, and another one
here where he debunked Putin's nuclear fear-mongering to Fox news and supported letting Ukraine strike Russia with ATACMS and says it should have been done a long time ago.
On one hand, he wants peace negotiations and has a negotiating position that I consider weak (freezing current lines, no support for Ukraine in NATO). On the other, he has been vocal about wanting Ukraine in a strong position with more weapons, and that the Biden admin has insufficiently supported Ukraine.