Live Conflict Ukraine-Russia War

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
1,580
Reactions
9 858
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
An episode of intense point-blank firefight between a Ukrainian serviceman and Russian volunteers from the Sever Brigade. The footage from the war chronicle shows how intense the battles in Ukraine can sometimes be. It has not yet been possible to determine which Ukrainian unit participated in the battle and where the video was filmed. Judging by the video, both soldiers have bulletproof vests. Small arms and grenades were used in the battle, drones were not used. The video is shortened, only the general situation during the battle is shown.

 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
1,580
Reactions
9 858
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Residents of Ukraine have published footage of Russian cruise missiles Kh-101 hitting the Pridneprovskaya TPP in the city of Dnepropetrovsk. The video was filmed by several eyewitnesses from different angles on December 25. At the time of the missile attack, Ukrainian air defense was working, but the shot down missiles are not visible on the video. A total of 12 missile strikes were recorded in Dnepropetrovsk. The range of the Russian Kh-101 missile is up to 5,500 km, the warhead is 400 kg.


It is possible that the Ukrainian Gepard air defense system, made in Germany, is firing at Russian missiles.
More about the Gepard air defense

 

Relic

Experienced member
Canada Correspondent
Messages
1,837
Reactions
14 2,807
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Canada
USA 🇺🇸 is set to announce a new $2.47 Billion usd military aid package for Ukraine today. $1.25 Billion usd worth of Presisential Drawdown Authority and $1.22 Billion usd worth of USAI will be used to fund the package.

I'll post the full contents of the package today, as it's released.


 
Last edited:

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
1,580
Reactions
9 858
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Footage of an aerial duel in Ukraine, Russian and Ukrainian interceptor drones. Both drones are equipped with drone interception nets, their chances in combat are equal, but the Russian operator turned out to be more experienced. The Russian drone is armed with a Taiga net launcher, their use was previously shown. The model of the net used by the Ukrainian drone is unknown.

 

Relic

Experienced member
Canada Correspondent
Messages
1,837
Reactions
14 2,807
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Canada
Still waiting for the release of USA's 🇺🇸 $2.47 usd military aid package for Ukraine today, but in the meantime, the Americans have made 2 additional announcements.

First, they have announced that they will transfer Ukraine $3.4 Billion usd in direct budgetary assistance through the Agency For International Development in conjunction with the State Department.

Second, they announced the official transfer of $15 Billion usd worth of funds to Ukraine through the World Bank. That $15 Billion usd comes from a pool of $20 Billion usd in the form of a loan that USA is distributing, backed by frozen Russian assets.

 

Relic

Experienced member
Canada Correspondent
Messages
1,837
Reactions
14 2,807
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Canada
Below are the contents of the USA 🇺🇸 $2.47 Billion usd PDA / USAI component of the military aid package for Ukraine. The PDA items will be drawndown from U.S. inventories and shipped immediately, while the USAI items have been contracted to U.S. defense contractors and will be shipped as they are produced:

- AIM-9M/X Missiles (NASAMS)
- AIM-120 Missiles (NASAMS)
- HAWK Air Defense Missiles
- Vampire Counter UAS Systems
- Stinger Air Defense Missiles
- ATACMS / GMLRS (HIMARS)
- JSOW Air-to-Ground Munitions
- HARM Anti-Radiation Missiles
- TOW Missiles (Bradleys)
- 155mm Artillery Shells
- 105mm Artillery Shells
- Javelin Anti-Armor Systems
- AT-4 Anti-Armor Rockets
- Unmanned Aerial Systems
- Small Arms and Munitions
- Grenades
- Demolitions Munitions
- Secure Comms Equipment
- Commercial Satellite Imagery
- Clothing and Individual Equipment
- Spare Parts
- Maintenance and Sustainement
- Transportation
- Training

 
Last edited:

carlitob

Member
Messages
5
Reactions
7
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
I'm still struggling to believe the shocking Russian performance on the battlefield when you consider the numbers, and support from North Korea.

I wonder of the long term impacts to Russians reputation, military and otherwise. Surely things must be desperate for them to invite North Korean soldiers to help fight their wars for them? Not great optics for a 'superpower' is it.

I'm also a little shocked Ukraine don't even seem close to being kicked out of the Kursk region they seized, does anyone have a link or up to date info on the state of play in this region?
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
3,498
Reactions
16 9,353
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
I'm still struggling to believe the shocking Russian performance on the battlefield when you consider the numbers, and support from North Korea.

I wonder of the long term impacts to Russians reputation, military and otherwise. Surely things must be desperate for them to invite North Korean soldiers to help fight their wars for them? Not great optics for a 'superpower' is it.

I'm also a little shocked Ukraine don't even seem close to being kicked out of the Kursk region they seized, does anyone have a link or up to date info on the state of play in this region?


yeah total shitshow for the Russians. Makes you wonder where they would be if they didnt have oil and gas to sell. You would have to imagine any attack on south korea, japan would have ended pretty bad for the russians.
 

MaciekRS

Contributor
Moderator
Poland Moderator
Messages
451
Reactions
6 1,232
Nation of residence
Poland
Nation of origin
Poland
It was last chance for russia to burn their Soviet era equipment to achieve something and have a chance to reactivate Soviet Union.
Lets face it, they are in no position to build new planes (they are f**** with civilian aviation because they have no engine), no new tanks, their fleet are useless.
It is all in, and either they scare west and they are still in a game or it is over for them. Would anyone believe some 20-30 years ago that russia will need help from N Korea?
 

Woland

Committed member
Moderator
Ukraine Moderator
Messages
205
Reactions
7 629
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Ukraine
I'm still struggling to believe the shocking Russian performance on the battlefield when you consider the numbers, and support from North Korea.

I wonder of the long term impacts to Russians reputation, military and otherwise. Surely things must be desperate for them to invite North Korean soldiers to help fight their wars for them? Not great optics for a 'superpower' is it.

I'm also a little shocked Ukraine don't even seem close to being kicked out of the Kursk region they seized, does anyone have a link or up to date info on the state of play in this region?
You can follow the map here: https://deepstatemap.live/en#9/51.3434808/35.7797241 - it also allows you to see changes over time by clicking the back arrow on the top left.
 

Perun

Active member
Messages
26
Reactions
2 41
Nation of residence
Croatia
Nation of origin
Croatia

Hari Sud

Active member
Messages
58
Reactions
2 34
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
Lessons from the Ukraine War and Their Implications

The Ukraine War has provided several critical battlefield lessons that highlight the evolving nature of modern warfare. These are the key takeaways:

1. Artillery Dominance: Artillery remains the backbone of modern warfare, proving to be the decisive factor in shaping the battlefield. Ukraine was short of a million artillery shells and was continuously loosing ground.

2. The Rise of Drones: Offensive and defensive drones have revolutionized combat, taking centre stage in surveillance, strikes, and disrupting enemy operations. Even the most primitive Iranian drones demoralized the Ukrainians.

3. Missiles as Strategic Weapons: Precision-guided missiles of all types are indispensable for achieving battlefield superiority. Very accurate American missiles were highly effective on Russian targets.

4. Air Force Limitations: The effectiveness of air forces has been significantly reduced due to advanced air defense systems, which prevent fighter jets from penetrating enemy airspace. Russians suffered that disadvantage.

5. Tanks as Endgame Assets: Tanks play a critical role in consolidating gains and occupying territory toward the end of a battle. Early deployment, however, is highly risky and often counterproductive.

6. Manpower’s Supporting Role: While ground troops remain essential, their deployment is most effective only after artillery, drones, and missiles have softened enemy defenses.

These developments signify a profound shift in battlefield tactics, necessitating the retraining of military officers and generals to adapt to these new realities.

On Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear weapons, though potent as tools of intimidation, face diminished effectiveness in the age of advanced, multi-layered air defense systems. Their strategic value is increasingly being questioned.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,118
Reactions
28 8,846
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Lessons from the Ukraine War and Their Implications

The Ukraine War has provided several critical battlefield lessons that highlight the evolving nature of modern warfare. These are the key takeaways:

1. Artillery Dominance: Artillery remains the backbone of modern warfare, proving to be the decisive factor in shaping the battlefield. Ukraine was short of a million artillery shells and was continuously loosing ground.

2. The Rise of Drones: Offensive and defensive drones have revolutionized combat, taking centre stage in surveillance, strikes, and disrupting enemy operations. Even the most primitive Iranian drones demoralized the Ukrainians.

3. Missiles as Strategic Weapons: Precision-guided missiles of all types are indispensable for achieving battlefield superiority. Very accurate American missiles were highly effective on Russian targets.

4. Air Force Limitations: The effectiveness of air forces has been significantly reduced due to advanced air defense systems, which prevent fighter jets from penetrating enemy airspace. Russians suffered that disadvantage.

5. Tanks as Endgame Assets: Tanks play a critical role in consolidating gains and occupying territory toward the end of a battle. Early deployment, however, is highly risky and often counterproductive.

6. Manpower’s Supporting Role: While ground troops remain essential, their deployment is most effective only after artillery, drones, and missiles have softened enemy defenses.

These developments signify a profound shift in battlefield tactics, necessitating the retraining of military officers and generals to adapt to these new realities.

On Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear weapons, though potent as tools of intimidation, face diminished effectiveness in the age of advanced, multi-layered air defense systems. Their strategic value is increasingly being questioned.
All of the above mentioned lessons have been already learned and taught by Turks in Libya, Syria, and Karabagh.
 

contricusc

Contributor
Messages
546
Reactions
8 816
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
4. Air Force Limitations: The effectiveness of air forces has been significantly reduced due to advanced air defense systems, which prevent fighter jets from penetrating enemy airspace. Russians suffered that disadvantage.

I‘d say this depends greatly of which aviation we’re talking about. If a country like the US or Israel uses its aviation, the effectiveness of air defence will be zero. But for most countries which have average aviation capabilities, air defence does play a role.

The fact that Russia couldn’t achieve air dominance doesn’t mean it can’t be achieved against a country with air defenses, it means Russia couldn’t.

Nuclear weapons, though potent as tools of intimidation, face diminished effectiveness in the age of advanced, multi-layered air defense systems. Their strategic value is increasingly being questioned.

I think this war has proven the opposite. The value of nuclear weapons remains huge, because it prevents powerful countries to gank up on you when they see weakness in conventional forces.

If Russia didn’t have nuclear weapons, we would be looking at a totally different war now, with NATO troops in Moscow and Putin at the Hague like Milosevic.

Russia is allowed to do what it does because it has nuclear weapons. Otherwise, they would have received the Yugoslavian treatment.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,091
Reactions
6 4,271
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
All of the above mentioned lessons have been already learned and taught by Turks in Libya, Syria, and Karabagh.
Libya is a Civil war. Karabagh a regional conflict. Syria is civil and proxy war. Only Ukraine against Russia is a „real“ full out war.
 

Ryder

Experienced member
Messages
10,941
Reactions
7 18,900
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Turkey

yeah total shitshow for the Russians. Makes you wonder where they would be if they didnt have oil and gas to sell. You would have to imagine any attack on south korea, japan would have ended pretty bad for the russians.

SK and Japan would be too hot to handle.

If Ukraine was successful Russia would have mounted an annexation of Belarus, Attack Georgia again or go for Kazakhstan.

Russia would have used the same Donbass BS to attack Kazakhstan. Lots of Ethnic Russians who live in Kazakhstan.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom