There are rumors that Fitzpatrick (one of the most pro-Ukrainian Republicans) voted no on the Big Beautiful Bill in part because of Ukraine aid, but there's a bit more to it than that. Fitzpatrick is in a very contested district and the Big Beautiful Bill is quite unpopular. Voting no on it will help him preserve his seat, and in the end his vote was not necessary for its passing. Nonetheless, his no vote was shocking, and he reportedly left Congress in a hurry after casting it, while Johnson and other representatives searched for him to convince him to change his vote. I don't know which other representatives demanded additional military aid to Ukraine in exchange for their votes, and the article doesn't actually mention anything about it.The Wall Street Journal is reporting that in order to secure votes for the "Big Beautiful Bill" pro-Ukrainian Senators and Congressmen quietly demanded additional military aid for Ukraine behind the scenes. Apparently the Trump administration agreed and will start quietly sending weapons to Ukraine again, behind the scenes.
WSJ, citing multiple sources, is reporting that the White House has requested that the Pentagon prepare a new Patriot Battery for Ukraine from the U.S. existing inventory. The Americans are reportedly also working with European countries to facilitate the transfer of another European system as well.
2 additional Patriot Batteries would bring Ukraine to at least 10 in total... We know the following have been donated so far.
Germany: 3 Batteries
USA: 3 Batteries
Romania/ Norway
: 1 Battery
Israel: At least 1 Battery
USA: 1 Battery pending
European Union: 1 Battery pending
The Russians are targeting the TCC offices recently, probably as propoganda since the TCC is probably among the most hated organizations in ukraine right now( a lot of dragging people into cars and shipping them off to the frontline).Russian kamikaze drones "Geran-2" struck the Ukrainian military registration and enlistment office in Odessa. There may have been strikes on other objects. Judging by the video of Odessa residents, the drones came from the sea to attack. Some drones were shot down with small arms, as they were flying at a low altitude. It is worth noting that there is no missile air defense in the video, perhaps it is on the outskirts of the city.
Looks like the saying "The best defense is a good offense" has a lot of truth in it.Big problem with Ukraine is that the PAC-3 missiles they use that successfully intercept the Iskander and Kinzhal missiles are running out. US cant produce enough of them to meet the numbers needed. Russians are saturating the battlefield with these so called hypersonic missiles. They are hyoersonic in midcourse. But they slow down in terminal phase and are intercepted by the PAC-3s.
Another problem is that Ukraine need to fire minimum 2, more likely 3 PAC-3s to intercept a Kinzhal or Iskander.
Where as big majority of the Russian missiles were being intercepted before May this year, now that the PAC-3 quantities are less, the interception rate has fallen sharply.
Also, a PAC-3 is around 4 million dollars a piece. Yet it costs Russians 400 to 500 thousand dollars to produce an Iskander. When Russia fires 6 Iskander at Kiev at a cost of 3 million dollars, Ukraine has to respond with 12 to 18 PAC-3s at a cost of 48-72 million dollars. That is unsustainable.
US can’t produce enough PAC-3s. Their production is capped at 650 PAC-3 a year. Yet Russians can produce this amount of missiles in a quarter.
This is a very good live experiment we as Turkiye should be watching very carefully. Interceptors like siper block 3 should cost much less than the incoming target missiles.
![]()
Swamped? The Math of Ukraine’s Missile Crisis
There are ominous development in Russia’s aerial bombardment of Ukraine but the West is failing to understand the dangers.cepa.org
Also, a PAC-3 is around 4 million dollars a piece. Yet it costs Russians 400 to 500 thousand dollars to produce an Iskander. When Russia fires 6 Iskander at Kiev at a cost of 3 million dollars, Ukraine has to respond with 12 to 18 PAC-3s at a cost of 48-72 million dollars. That is unsustainable.
If I would be an Ukrainian and see how the east of Ukraine looks like Palestine while Moscow goes on their daily live, i'd be pissed beyond imagination.This is one of the biggest mistakes the West is making when helping Ukraine. The insistence on high cost tier 1 air defence missiles like the PAC-3, which cost a lot of money, is a strategic mistake. It wastes a lot of resources for very little effect.
The money spent on Patriot systems and missiles should have been spent on offensive missiles. Ukraine would have done so much more if the same money would have been spent on Tomahawks, Taurus, Storm Shadows, SCALPS and other missiles to strike deep inside Russia.
In order to win this war, Ukraine needs the weapons to strike the Russian MIC. They need long range strike capabilities and the intelligence to strike the right targets. Instead, they receive expensive anti air missiles to defend against the products of the Russian MIC.
The easiest way to defend against Iskanders and Kinjals is to destroy the factories that build them. Much cheaper and effective than shooting at them with PAC-3s.
This is one of the biggest mistakes the West is making when helping Ukraine. The insistence on high cost tier 1 air defence missiles like the PAC-3, which cost a lot of money, is a strategic mistake. It wastes a lot of resources for very little effect.
The money spent on Patriot systems and missiles should have been spent on offensive missiles. Ukraine would have done so much more if the same money would have been spent on Tomahawks, Taurus, Storm Shadows, SCALPS and other missiles to strike deep inside Russia.
In order to win this war, Ukraine needs the weapons to strike the Russian MIC. They need long range strike capabilities and the intelligence to strike the right targets. Instead, they receive expensive anti air missiles to defend against the products of the Russian MIC.
The easiest way to defend against Iskanders and Kinjals is to destroy the factories that build them. Much cheaper and effective than shooting at them with PAC-3s.