Rostov Don, jadi Rostov GoneOuch, formiler favorite lontong.
Latest Thread
Rostov Don, jadi Rostov GoneOuch, formiler favorite lontong.
With the existence of long range missile, the submarine is safer when they hide somewhere out there in the sea.Hmmm not necessarily though, our submarine dock or dermaga kapal selam, both in surabaya and palu are atleast partially covered from optical spy satellites, plus the roof structure act as cantilever for the overhead crane (only in surabaya) View attachment 59392 View attachment 59391
although im not sure the recent condition of the Palu submarine dock after 2018 tsunamis, i think its poses no harm to the structures.
Even the nowaday Kriegsmarine (not Nazis) left the idea of enclosed submarine base and go full open without any coverage. Earlier Kriegsmarine, built these base, Saint-Nazaire U-Boote base View attachment 59394 View attachment 59396 View attachment 59395
THEY EVEN HAVE DRYDOCK FACILITY, HOW AWESOME.
and nowaday German Navy main submarine base, Eckenforde Submarine Base View attachment 59393
(even ours better than them....atleast..)
View attachment 59397
funfact : damn so thicc
Natuna and Batam should also be built these structures. Or even better to have something like cave submarine base spread all over the country View attachment 59398 View attachment 59399
It's complementary .... never stands alone ..With the existence of long range missile, the submarine is safer when they hide somewhere out there in the sea.
Hopefully we have decent air defense covering our naval bases.
I think China have underground naval base for their submarine, how good is underground and concrete base against missiles and bomb?
Which is more cost effective, reinforced hangar or SHORAD?
Like the uboat in Lorient?With the existence of long range missile, the submarine is safer when they hide somewhere out there in the sea.
Hopefully we have decent air defense covering our naval bases.
I think China have underground naval base for their submarine, how good is underground and concrete base against missiles and bomb?
Which is more cost effective, reinforced hangar or SHORAD?
i think that's too much, the MoD could get impeached by those vatniks saying it just a waste of money, better invest in healthcare and educationLike the uboat in Lorient?
Im inclined to cave based hangar for submarine, besides by nature it could minimize espionage, it's also really cool to haveWith the existence of long range missile, the submarine is safer when they hide somewhere out there in the sea.
Hopefully we have decent air defense covering our naval bases.
I think China have underground naval base for their submarine, how good is underground and concrete base against missiles and bomb?
Which is more cost effective, reinforced hangar or SHORAD?
IMO... its just tactical , he focus on invesment from mainland so must ease their minds .... whatever he said , doesn't mean anything , cos military is MOD bussines ...Luhut: RI Gak Perlu Jadi Negara Super Power Militer!
Menko Marves Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan menilai bahwa Indonesia tidak perlu menjadi negara yang unggul dalam kekuatan militer.www.cnbcindonesia.com
When he said in that context ... i do too feel we are too prematurely for talking big about anything as yet . when we can barely make our house in order as yet ....Luhut: RI Gak Perlu Jadi Negara Super Power Militer!
Menko Marves Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan menilai bahwa Indonesia tidak perlu menjadi negara yang unggul dalam kekuatan militer.www.cnbcindonesia.com
Don't be so fast in taking conclusion .. truthfully we are so low on the totem pole . We might be seeing only facades and shadows ...Dia sudah menjual jiwanya ke mainland...
Tapi kan jokowi sebagai presiden mengawasi parpol2 melalui institusi negara, gak dikasihkan ke partai tertentu hasilnya, cuman buat presiden doang.
Dan itupun menurut ane perlu dilakukan gitu, biar gak ada partai yang berbuat macam2, kalau ada bisa langsung ditindak, bukan tentang masalah pemilu dsb tapi lebih ke ideologi mereka dll.
Ini naif sih.
Hampir ngga ada ceritanya menggunakan institusi intelijen yang saling overlap, trus hasilnya cuman buat bacaan pribadi minggu siang di rumah.
what if it was to prevent something like this though ?
UK's MI5 warned Conservatives over possible Chinese spy candidates, the Times reports
Britain's domestic intelligence agency, MI5, warned the governing Conservative Party that two potential candidates to become lawmakers could be spies for China, and the party blocked them, the Times newspaper reported on Wednesday.www.reuters.com
For one, that's clearly NOT the way Jokowi from his mouth himself describes what the intelligence agencies are up to. He clearly describes that the intelligence works by leaking the internal workings of the party such as their allegiance,
Saya tahu dalamnya partai saya tahu. Partai-partai seperti apa saya tahu. Ini mereka menuju ke mana saya ngerti.
Clearly this is not the same as alerting for potential national security issue, but alas we've been getting used to this kind of thing aren't we? I mean to top it off, why not ask the army to work for the party? That'll secure seat.
Jokowi jelas make hasil intelijen utk cawe cawe kepentingan pribadi dia, kemungkinan besar KSP Moeldoko ikut campur di partai Demokrat ya hasil cawe cawe itu, belum lagi ngomongin Golkar dan ambiguitas PDI-P - Jokowi
Tapi kan jokowi sebagai presiden mengawasi parpol2 melalui institusi negara, gak dikasihkan ke partai tertentu hasilnya, cuman buat presiden doang.
Dan itupun menurut ane perlu dilakukan gitu, biar gak ada partai yang berbuat macam2, kalau ada bisa langsung ditindak, bukan tentang masalah pemilu dsb tapi lebih ke ideologi mereka dll.
Ini naif sih.
Hampir ngga ada ceritanya menggunakan institusi intelijen yang saling overlap, trus hasilnya cuman buat bacaan pribadi minggu siang di rumah.
what if it was to prevent something like this though ?
UK's MI5 warned Conservatives over possible Chinese spy candidates, the Times reports
Britain's domestic intelligence agency, MI5, warned the governing Conservative Party that two potential candidates to become lawmakers could be spies for China, and the party blocked them, the Times newspaper reported on Wednesday.www.reuters.com
For one, that's clearly NOT the way Jokowi from his mouth himself describes what the intelligence agencies are up to. He clearly describes that the intelligence works by leaking the internal workings of the party such as their allegiance,
Saya tahu dalamnya partai saya tahu. Partai-partai seperti apa saya tahu. Ini mereka menuju ke mana saya ngerti.
Clearly this is not the same as alerting for potential national security issue, but alas we've been getting used to this kind of thing aren't we? I mean to top it off, why not ask the army to work for the party? That'll secure seat.
Jokowi jelas make hasil intelijen utk cawe cawe kepentingan pribadi dia, kemungkinan besar KSP Moeldoko ikut campur di partai Demokrat ya hasil cawe cawe itu, belum lagi ngomongin Golkar dan ambiguitas PDI-P - Jokowi