Wuhan one year later: An American’s perspective: WGN News

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,327
Reactions
96 18,910
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
But you have obsession of CCP, that's not normal, we can talk about issues but you bring CCP to every thread and post concerning China. If you do like to talk about CCP, start a thread dedicated to it, not do it in very post and thread.

This is your opinion and you are welcome to hold it.

What is unacceptable is your ad-hominem yet again (waaah not normal waaah).

This is my last warning to you to refrain from that.

Please treat 2021 as a new year to start a better approach to this forum in how you go about your way here. I would suggest if I am replying in a thread you started and not quoting you, you simply need not quote me.

Post your assertions and counters as you would like, and simply let the audience decide. I do not understand why you are so fearful of this, letting people think and decide for themselves with both sides of story presented?

I have not asked you to stop posting whatever you want thread wise. You are most welcome to the free speech basis we established here, that runs contrary to CCP policy (ironically).

I have supported your free speech right here just like any other member.

It is all about posting within the clearly stipulated rules.

I ignore most threads you post here, anyone can see for themselves what you post and what the replies/interaction are in general.

Where I feel something (article, content) is being disingenuous or egregious enough, I will use my free speech right to give my response.

Exactly who do you think you are to label and assert what can and can't be replied to here?

Who do you think you are giving a sermon to a moderator here about how to go about their business in what and when to start threads and "keep it all there".

Should I say the same to you and say every Sai Zik Mun post should be in one thread just for him? Shall we do an outright poll on whether your actions/agenda here are "normal" to the audience? Or should we simply follow the rules and let people decide as they want to?

Yet you have audacity to talk up to a mod like this? What role you had in creating and contributing to this place? Want me to tell you where to put your snarky opinion next? Best desist from it buddy.

Any more snarky attitude, undermining of or ad-hominem towards moderators will be dealt with appropriately.

That is against the rules. Let me repeat it again.

No more buffer and "new guy settling in" approach...it will be zero-tolerance henceforth.

Leave whatever behaviour, expectation or dependency you have from any other forums/zones you are used to... strictly at those places.
 
Last edited:

xizhimen

Experienced member
Messages
7,391
Reactions
384
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
This is your opinion and you are welcome to hold it.

What is unacceptable is your ad-hominem yet again (waaah not normal waaah).

This is my last warning to you to refrain from that.

Please treat 2021 as a new year to start a better approach to this forum in how you go about your way here. I would suggest if I am replying in a thread you started and not quoting you, you simply need not quote me.

Post your assertions and counters as you would like, and simply let the audience decide. I do not understand why you are so fearful of this, letting people think and decide for themselves with both sides of story presented?

I have not asked you to stop posting whatever you want thread wise. You are most welcome to the free speech basis we established here, that runs contrary to CCP policy (ironically).

I have supported your free speech right here just like any other member.

It is all about posting within the clearly stipulated rules.

I ignore most threads you post here, anyone can see for themselves what you post and what the replies/interaction are in general.

Where I feel something (article, content) is being disingenuous or egregious enough, I will use my free speech right to give my response.

Exactly who the do you think you are to label and assert what can and can't be replied to here?

Who do you think you are giving a sermon to a moderator here about how to go about their business in what and when to start threads and "keep it all there".

Should I say the same to you and say every Sai Zik Mun post should be in one thread just for him? Shall we do an outright poll on whether your actions/agenda here are "normal" to the audience? Or should we simply follow the rules and let people decide as they want to?

No...yet you have audacity to talk up to a mod like this? What role you had in creating and contributing to this place? Want me to tell you where to put your snarky opinion next? Best desist from it buddy.

Any more snarky attitude, undermining of or ad-hominem towards moderators will be dealt with appropriately.

That is against the rules. Let me repeat it again.

No more buffer and "new guy settling in" approach...it will be zero-tolerance henceforth.

Leave whatever behaviour, expectation or dependency you have from any other forums/zones you are used to... strictly at those places.
Let's just talk about the posts but not posters and political parties, that's what I suggest. let's just present facts and evidence solely concerning the topics, not baseless politically charge accusations.
One thing we both agree on, let people decide, we all should be responsible for a healthy discussion environment, which baseless personal attacks and slanderings should be totally banned.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom