Hypocrite. In arabic, munafiq?
Hypocrite. In arabic, munafiq?
Add WION.Only authentic news channels are The Hindu, NDTV, India today etc every one else is a liar.
Monster. In Arabic Wahsh وحشHypocrite. In arabic, munafiq?
The Taliban are not barbaric?The building was bombed in the same video by the barbaric regime
Im not Erdogan.Hmm, who is defining the word Barbaric?
As Erdogan says The Blood is on their hands.
The Taliban are not barbaric?
What part of my question didnt you understand?Were they operating Jalalabad, Kabul or Guantanamo torture prisons, what the champions of humanity did and doing there, was that all for the good of humanity ?
Some of that stuff is still available on the web and some teachings of champions of humanity are posted on this thread, Did Taliban's did it ? So which side is barbaric ?
All this genocide etc about Taliban's, Please post them here so we can know about it.
This is the thread everyone needs.Were they operating Jalalabad, Kabul or Guantanamo torture prisons, what the champions of humanity did and doing there, was that all for the good of humanity ?
Some of that stuff is still available on the web and some teachings of champions of humanity are posted on this thread, Did Taliban's did it ? So which side is barbaric ?
All this genocide etc about Taliban's, Please post them here so we can know about it.
What part of my question didnt you understand?
Why the questions?
Just a 'yes' or a 'no' will do.
To be honest,The Taliban are not barbaric?
So its difficult for you to answer a simple question,good to know.I am not their spokesperson or a lawyer, You can ask them your self.
The only answer i needed thanks.Yes, Taliban are barbaric on several occasion.
You're welcome, sir.The only answer i needed thanks.
I didnt ask about the others.
What part of my question didnt you understand?
Why the questions?
Just a 'yes' or a 'no' will do.
The media in each of these countries are broadly in sync with the ruling order. They all read from the same page but have differant accents. I sazw the media coverage building up to the Iraq war. They were complicit in the gabrication, lies that the governments peddled. Ask Julian Assange what freedom of press means. They will get you!Nah. These outlets may have some issues but on various occasions like Watergate scandal, 2002 riots, American excesses and lies in Iraq, recent Pegasus scandal and numerous others have not only stood up to their Govts but also exposed them.
Yes, they are by my measure but so are the rest.The Taliban are not barbaric?
Fox is in sync with the Biden Admin? Were CNN, NBC in sync with the Trump Admin?The media in each of these countries are broadly in sync with the ruling order. They all read from the same page but have differant accents. I sazw the media coverage building up to the Iraq war. They were complicit in the gabrication, lies that the governments peddled. Ask Julian Assange what freedom of press means. They will get you!
Fox is in sync with the Biden Admin? Were CNN, NBC in sync with the Trump Admin?
Not just Tucker, there are a whole bunch of Fox news, Newsmax folk who have gradually pushed the limits of the Overton Window to bring what would once be considered views too radical to be part of the mainstream. One could argue the same about the left although on the left it's been a more gradual process. One feeds off the other and extends the boundaries - the more woke the left thinks it is, the more entrenched the right gets and this helps the media in either side expand the Overton Window.Its manufactured controlled op within the overton window.
Tucker on Fox is pretty much the only one that regularly tests (or maybe is "allowed" to test) the boundary of this in the MSM. It is why he makes outreach to lot of leftie-populists regularly (Glenn Greenwald, Jimmy Dore, Matt Taibi etc)
Rest on MSM are paid hacks and shills....just matter of degree. If the state wants a war, they will warmonger for it. Its just a donor business and US Fed/deep state simply has the biggest pockets and safe space buffer around if you want to fill in your career saying a bunch of words on some script and narrative and kabuki set by them.
Truth telling journalists with integrity have long left and set up in alt-media now.
kaptaan and yankeestani etc are correct if you challenge certain narratives (i.e move beyond overton window set by the "deep state"), they deplatform you or worse. Assange is the most visible case of this.
Frankly, if a tweet (twitter itself is a controlled hackjob in the end btw) meets this forums rules....it should be allowed. Simply the reader can decide for himself/herself how credible it is....what the source's bias is etc. That is how it should be.
The gatekeeping using this word "authenticity" given just how bad even the "fact checking" sources are compromised (once you dig there)....is a cop out.