If you want to discuss "RSS ideology" vis a vis "scholarly articles" in this context you can continue here:
sooner or later he will face the same fate of Ajmal Kasab... I never understand the mentality to kill people waiting for trains and going back to home from office . Its no rocket science , even all global terrorism some how get a common connection
defencehub.live
But to get anywhere (regarding fascist ideology of which you will find number of Indians criticizing incl me) you will need basic good-faith approach on the principle.
So far yours has been the equivalent of:
1) Excuse/ignore clear far larger blatant instances (given the evidence) of it in actual operation at state scale (eg. Xinjiang) currently and in history (esp if islamist origin)
2) Hit like on (now deleted) post with "Gog and Magog" and "Dhul-Qarnain" collective attack on my entire nation (regular people and all)
3) Simply say "scholarly articles say nazism" without taking ownership of your own (specific) views, approach and argument basis (different to an author, whom you also do not present).
Authors of such articles are responsible and accountable for their words which is larger discussion.
It would depend on the author's credibility (like would they do 1 and 2 like you have) to begin with.
Because after all (given this is TR politics thread).... Turkish nationalists here have never seen this trope of "scholarly articles" insinuating or openly attacking their nation or whatever political parties within them on something to level of "Nazism" "Genocide" before.
They have never seen such tactics especially in use by FETO and other islamist scum right now correct?
By simple basis of saying "just look at the scholarly articles that are easily searchable and that say Nazi or whatever other trope"
Your same approach (but shoe on another foot, but same islamism be all end all) would seek to undermine how a Turk Nationalist can respond to such things as Kurdish issue accusations (by various "scholars").
All the while you have not even cleared past issue (1)....concentration camps in Xinjiang.
All the while you do not factor in to the slightest bit level of Kurdish representation and participation in Turkish political scene, media and discourse.
All things that very much prevent situation of Xinjiang concentration camps (which needs CCP totalitarian monolith) from having a chance of developing.
Or is it your contention that muslims in India do not have this situation that Kurds do in Turkey?
Or that a lot of Turkish nationalists criticise (and even despise) the ruling party in power?...and this is so different to Indias case?
That this internal criticism (producing scholarly articles of its own) is even allowed in first place? (Quite unlike country of issue 1)
If so bring up the facts, articles in the IN thread and lets get to the meat of the matter there.
But here you are going....don't even trade (or talk in any larger realm between people) and "I don't want to spoil the party but....Nazis!"
What are we to think of a person that quotes "Scholarly articles" about anti-semitism in Poland, Hungary, Romania, France, Italy or whichever European country between 1933 and 1945....but ignore and deflect away from numero uno because of some convenience/issue/filter known only to him?