Correct me if i am wrong too, wasn't the ship already delivered to the navy and was going through fitting of the some systems? Or was it just 'launched' and pulled to dock for fitting?
From what i understand you imply the first material was supplied by imports, and we know swedish contribution on the material and structural design, manufacturing parts
Swedish who mastered composite manufacturing of large hulls in the beginning of 2000 has messed it up in Indonesia? And delays on the second hull is not related to bureucratics (insurance, inspection, court ruling) and budget allocation? There are thousands page long documents on the incident, if it was just related to the material it wouldn't be this long i think.
After all, the ship has passed class society's approval, so is the material formulation and manufacturing technique. I am dropping a few documents for people who is interested in the subject further. One of them is related to the material used on Visby class, a true combat ship.
If someone is further interested they can have a look at the DNV-GL HSLC Patrol rules, spefically the material section and how many stages needed for material to pass for application.