Indonesia Indonesian Army,Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Darat (TNI-AD)

NEKO

Experienced member
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
2,974
Reactions
3 2,571
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
MTCR only restrict the ability of members to sell the technology (ToT) or missile with range longer than 300 km.
Its kinda BS rule, only apply to non US vassal state.

What about bri'ish trident and tomahawk (is it limited to less than 300km)? Or Australia future tomahawk and jassm er.
 

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Its kinda BS rule, only apply to non US vassal state.

What about bri'ish trident and tomahawk (is it limited to less than 300km)? Or Australia future tomahawk and jassm er.

Only apply to non five power vassals state

Pakistan got their Missiles system from China, then Russia give their own version of Iskandar M to Armenian, there is also other example. There is no fair rule in this world
 

Captain Wales

Committed member
Messages
227
Reactions
188
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Its kinda BS rule, only apply to non US vassal state.

What about bri'ish trident and tomahawk (is it limited to less than 300km)? Or Australia future tomahawk and jassm er.
well the rules say that "delivery systems that can carry a payload of 500 kg" tomahawk carries 450 Kg warhead.

another exception is the MTCR states that it does not supersede prior agreements. british trident were part of an agreement in 1980 (or an extension of US-UK agreement from 1958) which is years before MTCR created (1987).
another thing to note Trident and tomahawk got some british made component
 
Last edited:

NEKO

Experienced member
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
2,974
Reactions
3 2,571
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
You're in luck. Iran is a non member of MTCR. Do you see that sweet sweet missile range above 300 km owned by Iran in the graphic?

Iranian-Missiles-Map-2020.jpg
So much variants, sadly we can't make any of such thing for now.
Getting ToT from them will surely resulting a sanctions form US.
 

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
You're in luck. Iran is a non member of MTCR. Do you see that sweet sweet missile range above 300 km owned by Iran in the graphic?

Iranian-Missiles-Map-2020.jpg

The maps seems misleading greatly, Indonesia here is depicted way too small. Distance between Jakarta to Banda Aceh is at least 2400 km , to Jayapura is more than 4000 km, to Singapore is more than 1200 km, to Kuala Lumpur is 1600 km, to Manila is more than 2,700 km.. sigh
 

FPXAllen

Contributor
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
1,090
Reactions
4 1,636
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
The maps seems misleading greatly, Indonesia here is depicted way too small. Distance between Jakarta to Banda Aceh is at least 2400 km , to Jayapura is more than 4000 km, to Singapore is more than 1200 km, to Kuala Lumpur is 1600 km, to Manila is more than 2,700 km.. sigh
Mercator projection's 'flaw'. This projection made landmass area to get stretched more the further they are from the tropics.

 

Gary

Experienced member
Messages
7,910
Reactions
21 12,488
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
I'm more curious why they didn't want to wait and buy cruise missile Matador AV-TM 300 by Avibras. They already bought Astros MLRS from the same company.
AV-TM are cruise missile. The army wants ballistic one. Ballistic and cruise missile has their own advantage and disadvantage.
 

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia

deadlast

Committed member
Professional
Messages
155
Reactions
2 357
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Call me whatever, but I never realized that we've also acquired Martlet missile.

Does anyone know when we bought it and whether it was in the same acquisition contract with Starstreak or in another one?
There are no open announcement of it either, most likely part of the newer batch of Starstreak order, the one that get the new LML-NG and VAMTAC LTV carrier instead of the earlier batch of LML with Land Rover Defender carrier.
 

FPXAllen

Contributor
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
1,090
Reactions
4 1,636
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
There are no open announcement of it either, most likely part of the newer batch of Starstreak order, the one that get the new LML-NG and VAMTAC LTV carrier instead of the earlier batch of LML with Land Rover Defender carrier.
I see. That's probably it then.

So now our army has Starstreak and Martlet for dual/multi purpose man-portable missiles, Mistral, RBS-70, Grom and QW-3 for anti-aircraft, and Javelin, NLAW, and Milan - among some other missiles - for anti-tank.

Interesting... 🤔
 

this is crunch

Contributor
Messages
657
Reactions
4 633
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
There are no open announcement of it either, most likely part of the newer batch of Starstreak order, the one that get the new LML-NG and VAMTAC LTV carrier instead of the earlier batch of LML with Land Rover Defender carrier.
How many Starstreak battery do we have?
 

deadlast

Committed member
Professional
Messages
155
Reactions
2 357
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
How many Starstreak battery do we have?
Ten batteries IIRC.

-------edit----------

Nine battery already operational out of ten battery ordered.

Each battery consist of:
  • 1x Command vehicle,
  • 1x Missile reload vehicle,
  • 1x Logistic/maintenance vehicle,
  • 1x CM200 radar vehicle,
  • 4x RapidRanger vehicle with Multi-Mission System (MMS)
  • 8x RapidRover vehicle with Lightweight Multiple Launcher/New Generation (LML or LML-NG).
https://www.len.co.id/kemhan-mabes-tni-ad-dan-pt-len-industri-lakukan-uji-tembak-rudal-starstreak/
 
Last edited:

JATOSINT 

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
2,254
Reactions
4 3,224
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
I see. That's probably it then.

So now our army has Starstreak and Martlet for dual/multi purpose man-portable missiles, Mistral, RBS-70, Grom and QW-3 for anti-aircraft, and Javelin, NLAW, and Milan - among some other missiles - for anti-tank.

Interesting... 🤔
Quite okay for MANPADS as the missile itself require little to no maintenance (CMIIW)

The more important aspect is the commonality/integration of the supporting network and sensors (radar, etc) of these different types of MANPADS

For example, can our Mistral, Starstreak, Grom, etc batteries 'talk' to each other?
 

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Quite okay for MANPADS as the missile itself require little to no maintenance (CMIIW)

The more important aspect is the commonality/integration of the supporting network and sensors (radar, etc) of these different types of MANPADS

For example, can our Mistral, Starstreak, Grom, etc batteries 'talk' to each other?

What kind of lovely talk you expect them to have ? ;)

Grom is the name of Manpads Missiles we got from Poland, for the set system we got is POPRAD air defense system, their along with MCP Mistral and Starstreak Forceshield is the set air defense system we got so far for the Army. Each of them actually can work in networking condition or working independently, for network system they wanted to have this is still in progress though
 

JATOSINT 

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
2,254
Reactions
4 3,224
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
What kind of lovely talk you expect them to have ? ;)

Grom is the name of Manpads Missiles we got from Poland, for the set system we got is POPRAD air defense system, their along with MCP Mistral and Starstreak Forceshield is the set air defense system we got so far for the Army. Each of them actually can work in networking condition or working independently, for network system they wanted to have this is still in progress though
Yes, talk = share data, etc
 

FPXAllen

Contributor
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
1,090
Reactions
4 1,636
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Quite okay for MANPADS as the missile itself require little to no maintenance (CMIIW)

The more important aspect is the commonality/integration of the supporting network and sensors (radar, etc) of these different types of MANPADS

For example, can our Mistral, Starstreak, Grom, etc batteries 'talk' to each other?
If each of those launchers is part of their own respective system, then we need something like some companies can offer to integrate them all.

But of course, if those missiles are being deployed as separate stand alone, infantry portable launchers, they can talk to each other over long distance just fine - preferably using secure radio system.

Anyway, while having a lot of different infantry portable missile types - both anti-air and anti-armor ones - makes us look like a showroom as well as causing a lot of problems in TNI's logistical department, somehow I think that we can exploit this to our advantage as well. For example, forming a squad-level team consisting of several four-man teams each equipped with different MANPADS. The same can be done with anti-armor missile launchers too.

for network system they wanted to have this is still in progress though
PT Len? Scytalys?

In any case, it's good that TNI top brass have long realized the importance of making different systems work together as one. But truth be told, from a security stanpoint, I believe that we have to develop our own system integration capability in-house in order to reduce our dependence to foreign companies to do it for us.
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom