Are there any UAV that could be used as OTHT platform?OTHT platform
Latest Thread
Are there any UAV that could be used as OTHT platform?OTHT platform
Hahaha...After what happen with Moskva, I start to think putting so much armament too tightly like that doesn't seems like a good idea afterall.
No worries, from the rumours we interested in FREMM ASW ver.AH140 and FREMM, I think AH has better potential to become our AAW
intermezzo, Lockheed martin proposal for Mark VI Patrol boat with expeditionary launching system.
View attachment 42658
source: Xavier Vavaseurr / Naval news
i guess there's nothing wrong putting the NSM on X-18 Antasena afterall, as long as we had a decent OTHT platform..
we are buying Iver or AH 140??Current Iver Huitfeldt's missile configuration is good enough for me.
Is it possible to make it antasena like Singapore unmanned patrol VesselIf they Made Antasena as part of swarm UAV Boats controlled from powerful mothership like LHD or Destroyer that's not problem
Inter-service rivalry, perhaps? Or, well, you know it's nothing new here.Why not just simply order more CAESAR
Possible? Of course. Whether or not there's an incentive to make it into one is a different matter though.Is it possible to make it antasena like Singapore unmanned patrol Vessel
Both SMART-L and APAR can do search and target tracking.while Iver have 2 Type of radars and each have their own purpose..
Search radar and Target Tracking radar..
It really is a joke.Inter-service rivalry, perhaps? Or, well, you know it's nothing new here.
Well getting stuff from eastern block is just the assumption of the writer.Ah, but you know, to at least try to see from different perspective, there might be some truly justified reasons why our Marine corps decide to pursue 155 mm SPH from different maker than Nexter.
I have no doubt that they have already tried their hands with Caesar and found that, for example, its traction on the beach is less than satisfactory for their needs. Or that they probably looking for a more "contained" gun turret or protected gun breech section instead of an open one. Or maybe because they just don't want to deal with another French-made products due to bad experiences with the AMX-10, or whatever.
Of course, those all are just my own assumption and they may all wrong. But then again, it's just my habit to try to think from different point of view.
Why the Army bought Caesar instead of eastern European solution.Caesar is already quite expensive and those eastern Europe solution is far more affordable for the marine, all this point' boil down to basic idea of
View attachment 42738
Why the Army bought Caesar instead of eastern European solution.
And I assume within the Army Kostrad get budget privilege.Army got budget priviledge compared to Marine corps, and other thing is Caesar suitable for their use and easy to mobilize even using C130