We are dependent on foreign EO targeting systems for such a big production capacity. Currently, Aselsan can only produce 72 CATS per year it will be raised to 120 in the short term and 144 short to middle term.
Latest Thread
I assume most of it are for foreign customers so if the end user is not under sanctions, they can buy directly from Wescam.We are dependent on foreign EO targeting systems for such a big production capacity. Currently, Aselsan can only produce 72 CATS per year it will be raised to 120 in the short term and 144 short to middle term.
Anka-S can stay airborne for 50+hours with this amount of fuel consumption.
Akıncı also flies with the Canadian PT6 engine and the PD225 which is nearly ready for duty.As Motor Sich plant in Ukraine is destroyed by Russia, so what are our options about Akinci, Mius & atak 2 engines ?, do we have even a single engine for prototype (Mius & atak 2) ?
By the looks of it situation is bleak, i don't thing akinci is going in to mass production any time soon and i don't even wanna talk about mius & atak 2.
I hope i am wrong but can some one clarify this issue.
@Yasar
@Combat-Master
Bad rendering of TB2.Is this a TB2 or TB3?
View attachment 44444
RR produces m250 b17 turboprop engine which produces 450 hp similar to that of akinciAnything that TEI is going to produce would be too late for our needs. For the mid to long term program, TEI is the way to go. But for short term our hands are tied.
There is one way to sort it all out, and that is RR.
RR Adour is a 6000lbf class turbofan. It has afterburner if needed.
This engine would be the answer to MIUS.
Atak 2 engine may have to be a derivative of RR-RTM-322 which is a turboshaft derivative of RR-Adour. At 2160HP it needs to be beefed up a bit. But it is an engine tested and tried on Apache and Blackhawk.
So we need to hurry up and sign on the dotted line to form a partnership with RR.
View attachment 44443
Correct! also Rolls Royce/Honeywell TPE-331 turboprop family can provide 550-1650HP power for any type of propeller driven plane.RR produces m250 b17 turboprop engine which produces 450 hp similar to that of akinci
Correct! also Rolls Royce/Honeywell TPE-331 turboprop family can provide 550-1650HP power for any type of propeller driven plane.
We haven’t even got ts1400 ready for Gokbey yet. You are talking about a turboprop version. Yes. It should be developed. But for long term. By the time TEI gets round to making it, testing it, then integrating it, it will be 2-3 years at best, before serial production can start. In reality it could even be longer.We don't know how many strings are attached to foreign options.
I would use PD225 for low power Akıncı and use a de-rated TS1400 for the high power monster. This can happen in 6 months. With TS1400 it maybe possible to operate Akıncı from LHD Anadolu without tugging. Using some AI this can be possible.
We haven’t even got ts1400 ready for Gokbey yet. You are talking about a turboprop version. Yes. It should be developed. But for long term. By the time TEI gets round to making it, testing it, then integrating it, it will be 2-3 years at best, before serial production can start. In reality it could even be longer.
PD222 is still being worked on. Even if it were ready it would not be doing justice to our Akinci. That plane needs a 750hp turboprop to do what we want it to do. In fact recently Selcuk Bayraktar was looking for a 900-1000HP engine to integrate.
How are you going to operate Akinci from TCG Anadolu with it’s 20m wingspan?
We don’t really have much option at the moment. We need a good solid foreign engine manufacturer like RR that is ready to co-produce engines in Turkey to speed things up. As the Turkish proverb goes;
“We can no longer afford to dream about focusing on birds on a tree branch. But we need to concentrate on the birds we have in hand. “
For a company that has never manufactured a fully operational jet engine from scratch up until now, do you really think that they can turn ts1400, with a correct transmission in to a working, flying turboprop Under 2-3 years with all the whistles attached?Dude, you don't need a turboprop version to be made, while a turboprop is the ideal case a turboshaft is good enough to run a propeller. PD225 tests are 70% finished, give it 6 months to be completed.
You will need to clear the entire portside to pull off a landing. But the benefits will be huge. If you configure the ship to not include an amphibic operation you can use more of the space for storage of aircraft. They can even shorten the wings and still be able to fly well. Not all paths lead to a foreign reliance.