HIMARS, Harpoon, Nasams and whatever the west is sending are ready products, the JFS-M meanwhile are just mockups.
Avia pro are not reliable source of news. Here they claim NATO Leo 2s are crossing inhulets river in Ukraine
I've said "take it with a pitch of salt", the news about leopards is just non-sense , quoting a RU Telegram channel that mostly provides sometimes real info but also propaganda and confusing news, so probably that "article" may be deleted soon.
On the other hand I give some credit to JFS-M missiles in these points:
-Costs about testing of the missile should be carried by MBDA, so first packs of missiles could come cost-free in the case they finally arrive UKR.
-RU is closing the gas tap to Germany in recent days, so it is a good reason to allow the transfer this kind of experimental weapons to UKR.
-We have seen a lot of political caution about the moments of delivering weapons from the west, at this moment, I think makes sense to transfer them.
-We are speaking about MBDA, 1st european missile vendor, not an startup, so the new weapon has to be made with effectiveness in mind or a lot of money will be lost from shareholders.
-Bayraktar company is being successful in UKR and traslating it to a big
impact on the market. Even the company wich makes the switchblades
has a significant section on the web about Ukraine's war, despite the questionable performance shown on battlefield. I can imagine MBDA CEO calling Scholz every week.
Anyway I'll emphasize again to take this with a pitch of salt, but I think its interesting to mention it, knowing the moment we are in the war.