TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

[Combat-Master]

What it is then ?

I'm going to say it's probably one of the G's, Gozde ?

 

[Afif]

Gokhan, maybe G40..btw Cruise missiles doesnt have this random.

Doesn't it look too thick for air to air missile?

 

[Ecderha]

Few days ago, I read the history of German IRIS-T missile. I commend you to read the history, too. Especially where the West thought they were ahead of A2A missile. The bitter truth was. They were not. In this case, we talk about R-73, which were ahead in all parameters on its western counterparts. What I want to say, is, if you underestimate Russians, you will face a bitter truth again.

I would agree and Accept you FACT or Logic if we were in 1960-70-80.
it was USSR.
Where Communists Applied pressure to ALL
There were many Talented people NOT russians, They Innovated, Created, Build-ed so many products. What happens is USSR was evil regime which take it all and show it as russian.
Remember Ukraine also was the member of the union. Ukraine people were ONE of MOST which innovated many many platforms for ussr.
in 1991 all I repeat all ussr talented people escape Communist state russia and went to WEST...




In present russia is controlled by mafia........
-working people most of them are corrupted
-on Management are only mafia like people, mean no future for any ECO system related to engineering.
- Main goal is to steal. Main goal is to trick people with money..............etc
-They simulate that they work
-They simulate that they innovate new


Bottom line........ russian products are out dated.........russian create pseudo products with core of old design
It is not about underestimate it is reality, it is a FACT

 

[UkroTurk]

What it is then ?

Kamikaze Drone which has 5kg warhead !

 

[Tornadoss]

Geziyorrrrrrr

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567520131311456257

This should be some kind of bomb probably with a guidance kit, not a missile as specified in the tweet #bombagibi

 

[Cabatli_TR]

KGK-SIHA-82 with active Rf seeker fire forget variant
65km range

@SavunmaSanayiST.com

 

[Bogeyman]

KGK-82 for SİHAs with active radar seeker - 65 km range

 

[Bogeyman]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568697693895282689

Roketsan's new design quad CİRİT Missile pod.

 

[Heartbang]

quad CİRİT Missile pod.

STILL a 4-missile pod! ffs they should pack them up more densely!

 

[guest12]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568697693895282689

Roketsan's new design quad CİRİT Missile pod.

After all these years .... finally!

 

[UkroTurk]

View attachment 47545
View attachment 47547

KGK-82 for SİHAs with active radar seeker - 65 km range

İt must be made for blowing up ships..

But also could blow any heavily armored MBT any APS can't resist.

 

[Brokengineer]

İt must be made for blowing up ships..

But also could blow any heavily armored MBT any APS can't resist.

I do not think it will be effective against heavily armed ships.
I think it is made to engage targets without entering their airspace.

 

[Manomed]

I do not think it will be effective against heavily armed ships.
I think it is made to engage targets without entering their airspace.

US was able to convert their MK series into anti ship missiles tbh

 

[Yasar_TR]

MK82 bomb weight is a 227kg. But the actual bomb contains 87-89kg of explosives in a metal container shell that weighs 140-150kg. It is the shrapnel effect of the metal shell that devastates ground forces.
Both Harpoon and Atmaca missiles weigh around 700kg and have an explosive payload of around 220kg. They also have a penetrating head to go through the outer shell of a ship. They are engineered and built specifically for sinking a ship. They travel at 0.9 Mach and hit their target with that kinetic force.
MK-82 glide bomb is much slower and it needs to be very precise in where it hits a ship to sink it. But it will definitely cause serious damage and may even decommission a ship. It could even sink smaller than corvette size vessels. (Even small Mam-L missiles managed to decommission some Russian coastal vessels.)

 

[Nutuk]

You don't need to sink a ship to turn it useless

 

[Combat-Master]

You don't need a large warhead to cause enormous damage to ships, look at Cakir mini cruise missiles.

Technical Specifications​

Range	150 + km
Missile Weight	≤ 275 kg (Without Booster) ≤ 330 kg (With Booster)
Missile Diameter	≤ 275 mm
Missile Length	≤ 3.3 m (Without Booster) ≤ 4.1 m (With Booster)
Warhead Weight	70 kg
Warhead Type	High-Explosive Semi-Piercing Blast Fragmentation Thermobaric

Flight Engine	Turbojet Engine
Booster	Solid Fuel Launch Engine
Navigation Speed	High Subsonic (Mach 0.75–0.85)
Guidance	Mid-Phase Guidance: Inertial Navigation System Antijam Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Radar Altimeter Barometric Altimeter Terrain Referenced Navigation System Terminal Phase Guidance: Imaging Infrared-IIR RF Seeker Hybrid (IIR+RF) Seeker
Datalink	Network-Based Bidirectional Datalink
Platforms	Fixed and Rotary Wing Air Vehicles, UCAVs, AUSVs, Tactical Wheeled Land Vehicles, Surface Platforms

 

[Brokengineer]

I did not mean to underestimate hgk82's effect but rather it could not make it to the heavily defended ship due to both speed and altitude if you compare hgk82 to atmaca or çakir missile which engage targets with mach 0.8 to 0.9 speed, sea skimming and manueverability of anti missile systems.

 

[Yasar_TR]

You don't need to sink a ship to turn it useless

Definitely!
But can you imagine the satisfaction you would get when an AKYA torpedo explodes few metres below the hull of a large frigate and breaks it in half? And then when the ship sinks; Just think what it would do to the morale of you enemy! Never mind the impossibility of repair of a partly decommissioned ship.
It took just two almost Atmaca size Neptune anti ship missiles to sink Moskva. And the repercussions of that from the point of morale it gave to Ukrainians and the heartache to the Russians and sea warfare outcome in the Black Sea, was invaluable.
I can’t wait to see a Ramjet powered Turkish anti ship missile that will tear through a frigate from bow to stern at 2.5-3 Mach speed.

 

[Yasar_TR]

I did not mean to underestimate hgk82's effect but rather it could not make it to the heavily defended ship due to both speed and altitude if you compare hgk82 to atmaca or çakir missile which engage targets with mach 0.8 to 0.9 speed, sea skimming and manueverability of anti missile systems.

If the KGK-Siha-82 has a seeker head that does not advertise too much that it is coming, and since it is very small, plus comparatively slow, the enemy ships’ radars won’t register it. The KGK class smart bombs have stealthy structures anyway. So they are not easily picked up by enemy radars.
In fact a turbojet engine of an Atmaca or CAKIR would be a dead give away if compared to a KGK-82 from that point of view.

The tests carried out from Aksungur and Akinci used this KGK-82. Seeker head is different.

Yet the KGK-82 shown above post of @Bogeyman and below have a different seeker head. (A laser seeker head)
This may effect range. As can be seen the smart bomb has a stealth structure.

 

[Zafer]

tear through a frigate from bow to stern