Trakya_forever
Committed member
I hope we will see the Gezgin missile in Idef23.
Latest Thread
i think using todays world turbofan engine on a cruise missile will be reflected on radar easier than the turbojet engine for having less fan area to reflect radar waves, unless you develop 5th generation engine for that which nobody would as it should bea cost effective.
Which feature we are talking about? RAM, design ...?Gezgin is said to have features which makes it very much a stealthy missile
I hope it is something like JASSMWhich feature we are talking about? RAM, design ...?
with all due respect, i disagree! when a CSG is moving in battle formation in open sea, it is not possible to simply take out the whole CGS with one strike. even if you can get any nuclear tipped missile or torpedo through the defense screen of CGS.They are most useful in demolishing and erasing completely an entire carrier group with a single strike without much collateral damage as long as they are targeted away from ports.
Therefore if your adversaries know that you have them, they will think twice before coming close to the vicinity of your waters.
It will be shown before the election, I guarantee you. Maybe 18 MarchI hope we will see the Gezgin missile in Idef23.
This could be mitigated by engineering a more stealthy inlet design, the NSM, LRASM uses those approach.i think using todays world turbofan engine on a cruise missile will be reflected on radar easier than the turbojet engine for having less fan area to reflect radar waves, unless you develop 5th generation engine for that which nobody would as it should bea cost effective.
NSM use the Turbojet engine, you can do it. but how about Turbofan engine which i mentioned?This could be mitigated by engineering a more stealthy inlet design, the NSM, LRASM uses those approach.
The foremost low observable cruise missile uses Turbofan, it comes to the inlet design to minimize blade radar return.NSM use the Turbojet engine, you can do it. but how about Turbofan engine which i mentioned?
Engine | Williams International F112-WR-100 Turbofan |
---|
Yes, the best time is when they just leave port or on the way to battle as they are altogether within a square km.with all due respect, i disagree! when a CSG is moving in battle formation in open sea, it is not possible to simply take out the whole CGS with one strike. even if you can get any nuclear tipped missile or torpedo through the defense screen of CGS.
WVRwhich one is this again? is it BVR/RF of WVR/IR? i keep confusing those two.
US has different requirement, such as able to carry nuclear warhead, able to fly up to 2000-2500km and so on, but it doesnt mean that thats the right way to do it. as i said, US can do it, but t will cost you a lot of money that the whole reason people started to do cruise missiles instead of ballistic are the cost effectiveness. even US only purchase 460 of them, no more. but as you can see in Russia, countries need way more than thatThe foremost low observable cruise missile uses Turbofan, it comes to the inlet design to minimize blade radar return.
AGM-129 ACM - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Engine Williams International F112-WR-100 Turbofan
Cruise missile are clearly not a "cheap" delivery method, for that Western militaries used glide bombs and JDAM+Paveway. Cruise missiles like the JASSM, Taurus, SCALP are there to wipe out highly defended military installations (C2 bunkers, runways, hangars) in tandem with SEAD/DEAD operations destroying hostile air defense. Once the enemy command and control are devastated and its air defense are supressed (if not outright destroyed), they'll switch to more affordable munitions like JDAMs or Paveways.i said, US can do it, but t will cost you a lot of money that the whole reason people started to do cruise missiles instead of ballistic are the cost effectiveness.
If everyone attack a single country simultaneously, which is not common, no inventory is sufficient to defend that country. Therefore we have diplomacy, there are alliances....war is just a small aspect of human life!?? You cant be serious. We are low in every inventory imaginable in comparison to the threats we have. If armenia attacks Azerbajcan with the help of Iran and Russia, greece attacks us in the same time with help from France Egypt and others.... Go on a war then with 50 atmacas, and 50 soms.