Latest Thread
Now it's TISU's turn. We will be eagerly waiting the day when it will appear in all its glory. I know that there is no example of fighter drones that will create a force multiplier in the world except for experimental models and Turkiye has become a country that is being followed in the field of unmanned jets and bombers. History will be rewritten the day our unmanned fighter jets, which will be equipped with domestic AESA radar, firing our own BVR missile in conflict zones to shoots down a manned aircraft. Those are the aircrafts that will come one night suddenly against enemies.
Btw, I think TISU is designed with the air intakes on the upper part and will stand out more with its stealth and sensor technology. Aircraft with the air intakes on the top absorb lower amount of air required for the engine during sharp maneuvers and lose power, hence the mission profiles of these type of aircrafts are evaluated in this context so sensor fusion and stealth features will be special for TISU so I think TUSAŞ will use sensor fusion and surveillance systems developed for TFX on the TISU.
MIUS on the other hand was designed with the air intakes on the side and designed with canards. This means MIUS is designed for sharp maneuvers with a stealth fuselage with weapons taken inside the fuselage and will find its place in this mission profile in conflicts. They will be allocated to missions where they can maximize their capabilities with uniquely designed tactics in accordance to their characteristics. When the twin engine versions of these fighter drones arrive, the rules of the game will be rewritten.
When these two fighter drones are combined with their big brother TFX, the result will be an unbeatable and unreachable capabilities and tactics that will put the Turkiye in giants league.
February next year according to rumourswen will we see tisu
What is this at KE closse to engine ?
View attachment 50614
Alot of attached parts in its body doesnt make it less steathy ?
View attachment 50615
The TF-X looks surprisingly well developed imho but yea I agreeIt is a prototype and not the final product. Can you all stop trying to judge a product on its prototype?
Man if the Americans did the same the F-22 and F-35 would have never existed.
Y'all gonna loose your mind when you see the TF-X prototype. I can see it already.
It is a prototype and not the final product. Can you all stop trying to judge a product on its prototype?
Man if the Americans did the same the F-22 and F-35 would have never existed.
Y'all gonna loose your mind when you see the TF-X prototype. I can see it already.
and a few assembly flaws. and too many removable parts for a fast jet. I would have expected a smoother body
View attachment 50616
First thing is a moving part, probably for APU or auxiliary intake for high AoA manuevers.What is this at KE closse to engine ?
View attachment 50614
Alot of attached parts in its body doesnt make it less steathy ?
View attachment 50615
What is this at KE closse to engine ?
View attachment 50614
Alot of attached parts in its body doesnt make it less steathy ?
View attachment 50615
I think that is a fake nozzle, better appearance and aerodynamics, I hope it is helping to hide thermal signature or probably it is a placeholder for future/larger engine.
Well Baykar is not TAI or LockMart. It's normal for them to struggle a lot more when it comes to designing, manufacturing and assembling an aircraft of this calibre. Assembly issues aside (which could be caused by Baykar's manufacturing techniques), we really shouldn't be speaking of build quality here. What we are seeing is a working prototype, and that's good enough. That's the entire point of a prototype. Manufacturing excellence tends to improve overtime, and it should be the least of our concerns as things stand.and a few assembly flaws. and too many removable parts for a fast jet. I would have expected a smoother body
View attachment 50616
Me too. But this is an easy problem to fix. For example, I would design a solid shell body like the YF-23.and a few assembly flaws. and too many removable parts for a fast jet. I would have expected a smoother body
View attachment 50616
Yes I was also going to write that, wonder what's that?0:43
"The one on the right works fine, the one on the left is malfunctioning"
Could be anything man. Space X blew like a thousand rockets to get stuff right. It was expectedYes I was also going to write that, wonder what's that?
Maybe about screens idk
Tbh they had wrongly manufacturered parts in Akıncı PT01Could be anything man. Space X blew like a thousand rockets to get stuff right. It was expected