Have you ever seen dead children in person? Most likely you didn't.
But I did. I had the chance to briefly work with a NGO to help Rohinga refugees at border when they were fleeing the ethnic cleansing. Guess what? I strongly felt the urge to bring the perpetrators to Justice, and I still feel it to this day. As every normal human would do. But I never felt like some Burmese Children of Myanmar military elite should be killed as revenge.
If you ever actually saw a dead body of innocent child rapped in a blood soaked cloth, you never would've had the gut to advocate for deliberate killing of Children (of whomever they may be) as a tit for tat response.
I assume, you wrote it in hit of a moment. But in any conflict, ultimately there has to be something of values that differentiate the relatively good guys from bad guys. Otherwise, it is very animalistic on both sides. None of us should forget that.
No, I wrote what I did in calculated, well thought out fashion. Russians strike Ukrainian civilian targets without remorse, and without any attempt at collateral damage mitigation. The only way to get Russians to think twice about missile strikes with so little care for civilian life is to demonstrate a willingness to do the same in return.
Strike a couple schools and kill a couple hundred Russian children (especially the children that matter to the Russian elite) then go out publically and say the following...
"we'll continue to terrorize your children as long as you indiscriminately do the same to ours. Start targeting viable military targets, and leave our civilians alone, or we'll make it such that your precious oligarchs have their families hunted down and are killed without mercy, in Russia and abroad."
The only thing that Russia responds to is a heavy hand. Strike their elementary schools in affluent areas and send a message to Putin that you're not going to be terrorized into submission.
War is not for soft people. When British Air Marshall Arthur Harris ordered RAF bomber command to firebomb Dresden, Germany, turning upwards of 25,000 German women and children to literal soup due to the heat of the explosions and the subsequent wildfires, Harris did so with purpose... He was sending the Nazi's a message. "Stop indiscriminately bombing London and other British civilian areas, or we'll treat your civilians in an unfathomably inhumane fashion".
It worked. Dresden served as a shocking warning to the Germans. They were in complete dismay at the fact that their enemy could be even more cruel than they were. After Dresden was turned to ashes, German bombing campaigns in mainland Britain subsided substantially, especially against civilian infrastructure. The Germans (like the Russians now) knew that their territory was too vast to have adequate air defense to stop the British bomber command from repeating the Dresden tactic elsewhere. They feared cruel, calculated, capable retribution from the enemy and as a result, behaved with much more civility towards the British civilian populous moving forward.
I meant every word of what I said. A cold, cruel, calculated, mid-day strike on multiple affluent Russian elementary schools, followed immediately by a national message to the Russians to start behaving in a civilized manner and stop acting like sub-humans.