China has the means and the motive to dig up a F-35 wreck underwater. If they elected NOT to do that, lack of interest is the only reasonable explanation.Do you really belive that?
Latest Thread
China has the means and the motive to dig up a F-35 wreck underwater. If they elected NOT to do that, lack of interest is the only reasonable explanation.Do you really belive that?
Again, do you really believe that?China has the means and the motive to dig up a F-35 wreck underwater. If they elected NOT to do that, lack of interest is the only reasonable explanation.
What do you believe?Again, do you really believe that?
Yea.Again, do you really believe that?
American F16 took off from Jordan and hit Anka S after several requests from US side to not to fly close to their base.
First attack by Turkish drones was conducted early hours and targeted 500 meter away of the base. This attack caused US troops to flee to the bunkers. After Turkish drones kept flying, US officials called Turkish counterparts and requested to fly away from US bases.
When this changed nothing, pentagon ordered a patrolling F16 took off from Jordan to shoot.
This has still changed nothing on Turkey side. Same area was hit second time after the incident. At night, a more comprehensive bombardement occured (the one Ministry of Defense made an announcement about). Thanks to this, all US troops in the area were ordered to stay in bunkers.
Previously, Turkey had announced all relevant areas were targets and warned allies! to stay away to not to get effected as collateral.
The USA tried to break it yet this time Turkey won big.
500 meters is from Pentagon statement:Source?
From where you got this above info?
Or it is you idea what happened?
www.defenceturk.net
@Huelague500 meters is from Pentagon statement:
![]()
US shoots down armed Turkish drone after it came too close to US troops in Syria
The Pentagon said the U.S. military shot down an armed Turkish drone that came within 500 meters (yards) of American troops in northeastern Syria.apnews.com
And here is the statement we made:
![]()
Dışişleri Bakanlığı: Farklı teknik değerlendirmeler nedeniyle SİHA kaybedildi
Dış İşleri Bakanlığı, Irak ve Suriye’de PKK/YPG Terör Hedeflerine yönelik operasyonlar hakkında açıklamada bulundu.www.defenceturk.net
Us news on pentagon statements. Some sources also cliam that F16 took of from mousulSource?
From where you got this above info?
Or it is you idea what happened?
What do you believe?
Reminds me of the Iranian A2A loitering munition.https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...ring-sam-shown-to-russian-defense-ministerAir to Air seems questionable regarding cost efficency but can work as an element of surprise
A country who copying everything and anything, who has no clue what intellectual property is and never talk the truth, has the ability to take over the most advanced fighter jet on this planet. A fighter jet who belongs to the most dangerous enemy China has right now…hmm let me think about for a while .
Thank you for the info, but I am really trying to follow simple rule and it is check few years back of history and check present days.500 meters is from Pentagon statement:
![]()
US shoots down armed Turkish drone after it came too close to US troops in Syria
The Pentagon said the U.S. military shot down an armed Turkish drone that came within 500 meters (yards) of American troops in northeastern Syria.apnews.com
And here is the statement we made:
![]()
Dışişleri Bakanlığı: Farklı teknik değerlendirmeler nedeniyle SİHA kaybedildi
Dış İşleri Bakanlığı, Irak ve Suriye’de PKK/YPG Terör Hedeflerine yönelik operasyonlar hakkında açıklamada bulundu.www.defenceturk.net
This literally has nothing to do with their media though. It is quite literally what Pentagon has said, you are not going to get any other source on this and if you choose not to believe them then you are going to have to create your own reality mate.Thank you for the info, but I am really trying to follow simple rule and it is check few years back of history and check present days.
It is showed to us that there were many news and usa media are the one which is doing shits when it is about Turkiye. They, usa and their paid psudo news agency do one Think and it is Lies. They always I repeat always Twist and put it in a way which only Suits them and they blame Turkiye
Why I am saying this -> beacuse I really do not believe and use usa shit media as source of any True
But it is a surface launched one. Loitering missiles have some meaning for surface application as they can loiter around a sector, standing by for any pop up threat. I haven't got much idea on why would they want to make a loitering AAM. But as I said before, it can take down UCAVs, large aircraft or helicopters effectively if GCS is paired with HERİKKS.Reminds me of the Iranian A2A loitering munition.
![]()
Bizarre Iranian 'Loitering SAM' Shown To Russian Defense Minister
Iran has supplied what is only known as the 358 missile to proxies in Yemen and Iraq, but has never before acknowledged its existence.www.thedrive.com
Mostly unspoken confugurations, payloads and applications for SÜPER ŞİMŞEK.
Air to Air seems questionable regarding cost efficency but can work as an element of surprise against helicopters (You get the hint eh?) and slow flying aircraft (UAVs, and Tankers) thanks to long range, cruising characteristics and warhead size. Making it work will take a good amount of cooperation with AWACS and ground based radars.
Air to Ground Missile configuration has been a hyped one but seeker options make things even more beautiful. A range of 200 km (Can be extended up to 700 km with BLOS communication and more straightforward flight path) will provide AKSUNGUR and ANKA-3 with a adaptable stand-off munition.
We see that there are two EW configurations. First one is more about collecting signals while the other is a stand-in jammer. Compared to ÇAKIR LIR (Also planned to conduct the same kind of missions) this one might be more advantageous due to extended airtime and greater volume allowing for stronger jammers. View attachment 61689 View attachment 61690
Where did you get the image for SSimsek?Super Şimşek reminds me Loyal Wingman.
That is the Loyal Wingman
View attachment 61722
That is the Super Şimşek from the photo you shared
View attachment 61723
Could they be collecting data on this type of airfoil using Super Şimşek ? Before building Anka 3, they said that they were flying a small uav with the same wing profile as Anka 3. I wonder are they gonna do the same thing with Super Şimşek before Anka4?
I took it from the photo shared by @Kaan Azman on the previous page.Where did you get the image for SSimsek?