So, all these reports suggests that the programs for 1) refitting existing P75 submarines with DRDO PAFC, 2) a second batch of P75 consisting of 3 Scorpene class boats, and 3) P75I procurement all coexists right now I undesrtand? I'd say that's some major leap forward in terms of commitment of investment for the submarine fleet of IN.https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...k-submarines-from-france-101688953456665.html
"The three additional Kalveri class submarines will be fitted with air independent propulsion (AIP), which has been designed by the DRDO but will be tested and validated by the French Naval Group. The AIP gives longer endurance to a normal diesel attack submarine and allows it to remain submerged for over a week without the need to surface to charge its batteries."
Ordering three more Scorpènes is a sensible decision. I don't understand why they have the P-75I competition instead of just continuing with the Scorpène design.
Is it some problem with the French design or management or the Kalveri class leak? Or do they just want a larger SSK boat with more endurance and VLS for land attack missiles?
For me it seems like India would be better served with just continuing with the Scorpène design for SSKs and spending the money saved on speeding up the SSN program. As Australia showed with the Attack-class program it makes no sense trying to develop a SSK with SSN-like capabilities when you can just build a SSN. Even the largest SSKs today can't match the range, endurance and payload capabilities of a true blue water SSN.
I'm also of opinion, as I've always said, that they should axe the P75I. Especially since none of the AIP system on offer from the candidates are PAFC and as for the German and Korean offers, both of which use PEMFC with a metal hydride storage, they need a dedicated pure hydrogen facility which makes things even trickier. So unless they add a requirement of integration of DRDO PAFC for the P75I, it would be an incompatible double investment for IN's fleet of AIP subs. That's ignoring the fact that adding such requirement would make things even more difficult.I agree overall. Overall the expedience of bird in the hand worth 2 in the bush is hopefully kept in mind by IN (given the SSK numbers dropping well behind the original plan 20+ years ago)....given I dont see cost benefit and the time involved being good w.r.t say S-80 w.r.t larger tonnage it brings to bear....and the way I see this all playing out in potential conflicts downstream (I value having more sub numbers and ASAP).
We will know later this year what becomes of P75 I or if it will just be scrapped and more scorpenes ordered given DRDO AIP and further customisation and familiarity with the system and how that all is worked out between France and India.
India let go Mirage 2000 production line shift as well and this was costly mistake IMO. Just like the premature HDW 209 shelving in the 90s (leading to scorpene now in first place) and all the ToT that was abandoned by that.