Ballistic missiles are poor man's air force.I gotta say Iran certainly isnt lacking in terms of Ballistic missiles, especially in SRBM and MRBM.
Ballistic missiles are poor man's air force.I gotta say Iran certainly isnt lacking in terms of Ballistic missiles, especially in SRBM and MRBM.
1. Iran's ambitions are regional, not global.
2. The geopolitical and economic cost of nuclear weapons is too high for Iran.
3. Your points about "critical mass" with regard to technological development are in parts moot, in others inconsistent with reality.
For some of the points you have raised I would read this blog article: https://patarames.blogspot.com/2020/11/a-proposal-for-iranian-icbm.html
No, he is not a member of this forum AFAIK, but I think he is present at another forum.Is the author a member at this forum?
Ballistic missiles are poor man's air force.
I don't reach this conclusion when I read the article. Iran produces the missile engine domestically.First, the author contends that the motor of the Khorramshahr ballistic missile is imported, if I am not mistaken. This severely restricts Iran's potential to ramp up production of the hypothetical ICBM using an imported motor.
Well, if the Iranians manage to keep the price per MIRV low, a 35 ton ICBM with 3 warheads with pin-point accuracy (yet to be achieved by anyone) would need a production number of 2000 ICBM's to target every airplane of the USAF (6000 airplanes). It may seem far fetched right now, but 10 years in the future, who knows what Iranian missile tech breakthrough makes such an ICBM cheap and precise enough to be build in the 1000's.Assuming no Iranian ballistic missile is intercepted at launch phase and none of them are intercepted over continental USA at terminal phase - both are very unrealistic and highly optimistic cases from Iranian perspective - the damages done by a few thousand or 10k or 20k ballistic missiles with 400 kg conventional warheads will not be enough to deter the USA.
Well, if the Iranians manage to make to keep the price per MIRV low, a 35 ton ICBM with 3 warheads with pin-point accuracy (yet to be achievedby anyone) would need a production number of 2000 ICBM's to target every airplane of the USAF (6000 airplanes). It may seem far fetched right now, but 10 years in the future, who knows what Iranian missile tech breakthrough makes such an ICBM cheap and precise enough to be build in the 1000's.
Iran currently does not have that ISR capability yet, but with cubesats and a large SLV, one could launch up to a 100 of them in one go which would give Iran the capability to monitor every square meter of this planet with just a 30 minute interval. This capability is within Iran's means in 10 years time IMO.Iran probably lacks the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaisance (ISR) systems to effectively identify and track all aircrafts halfway around the world.
The locations of cities, or other fixed structures such as the White House, the Pentagon, naval bases, airbases, defence industries, Area 51, CIA headquarters and such are well known.
Those fixed sites will not need to be tracked in real time to assure a hit. Aircrafts or other movable weapon systems will need to be tracked to assure a hit.
I don't reach this conclusion when I read the article. Iran produces the missile engine domestically.
With a weight of 20 ton, its light enough for the R-27 4D10 motor to acclerate and the existing Khorramshahr TEL to transport.
Yeah, the engine is a copy of the R-27 engine, which Iran produces domestically. You are reading it wrong. If you are still not convinced, I advise you to contact him on his blog page.The author argues
Iran currently does not have that ISR capability yet, but with cubesats and a large SLV, one could launch up to a 100 of them in one go which would give Iran the capability to monitor every square meter of this planet with just a 30 minute interval. This capability is within Iran's means in 10 years time IMO.
Yeah, the engine is a copy of the R-27 engine, which Iran produces domestically. You are reading it wrong. If you are still not convinced, I advise you to contact him on his blog page.
The Noor-1 satellite is a COTS cubesat with IR capability that detect heat signatures. When one compares these signatures with previous regular satellite photos, one can judge where there is activity or not.A constellation of satellites in low earth orbit would provide Iran with the ability to monitor the other side of the planet in real time. Would Iran be able to build and launch so many satellites at short notice? Unlikely, if you ask me, going by history.
Would Iran be able to miniaturize sensors to that extent? I am not sure either.
They got the engine and know-how from the Koreans. There is no doubt the Iranians built the engines domestically. Where else would they get these rare SLBM engines from? The Russians?Is there any evidence that Iran produces the reverse engineered motor of the R-27 missile domestically?
Anything more substantial than a blogger?
Maybe videos or official confirmation?
Let me see if I can ask him in his blog.
It has much more than that
Any interesting things they say?
Arda Mevlütoğlu and Dr. Sıtkı Egeli's evaluations on Iran's ballistic missile and cruise missile programs. Those who know Turkish should listen. Let them tell those who do not know.
You don't want to miss this. It had been a really useful program. They talked about how nuclear weapons can be integrated into which missiles. They talked about the point where guidance systems have come.Any interesting things they say?