JF-17C is comparable to early model F16s ( Block 25 to 40). I'm sure it will give a good account of itself especially in the hands of a experienced fighter pilot.
And that's the problem: you can't possibly have 300-400 excellent pilots who also have incredible experience.
That's utopian, and so a very advanced aircraft masks some of these inaccessibilities.
The aircraft itself basically takes on some of these necessary characteristics on the battlefield to increase its survivability.
Because no matter how good a pilot you are, if the enemy aircraft has an above-average pilot and is technically at least two levels above you, you've already lost, even if you have exceptional flying talent.
After all, no country in the world will send a lousy or completely mediocre pilot in a latest-generation fighter jet, because after all, these are valuable defense assets.
No country in the world, not even India, will ever attack Pakistan or exert massive pressure.
Pakistan has nuclear weapons and that is an insurance policy that Turkey does not have. Therefore, J-17s would be enough to respond to conflicts; for everything else, the threat of nuclear weapons is there to keep the enemy's feet still.