TR TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
3,931
Reactions
5 4,134
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
People should get used to missed deadlines, there is nothing wrong with setting dates. Missing dates by several months is not a problem at all. You can only tie up loose ends when there is time pressure. Otherwise Moore's law of project management applies "90% of the project takes 90% of the time and the remaining 10% takes another 90% of time". All good.
One word. untrustworty.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,748
Reactions
94 9,070
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Holy Cow! People are acting like they have access to TUSAS management board and know everything.

Lockheed Martin just missed the previously declared delivery date of F-35 block 4 TR-3. It has been prosponded by several months.

These kind of delay in such a highly complex and complicated program is a frequent occurrence.

I agree, Kotil shouldn't have Gave a date, that TAI may or may not able to keep. It is always wise to play safe in these stuff. (That is why I think former SSB President insisted on 2024 date)

But if you have such a lack of trust in the higher authority of the most important institution (TAI) and think everything is highly politicized, how do you expect it to successfully deliver a porgram like KAAN? (Because it isn't about the talent, many countries has enough of it. It is much more about state's willingness, initiative and the competence of high-level management who puts everything together in the end)
 
Last edited:

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
935
Reactions
13 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Holy Cow! People are acting like they have access TUSAS management board and know everything.

Lockheed Martin just missed the previously declared delivery date of F-35 block 4 TR-3. It has been prosponded by several months.

These kind of delay in such a highly complex and complicated program is a frequent occurrence.

I agree, Kotil shouldn't have Gave a date, that TAI may or may not able to keep. It is always wise to play safe in these stuff. (That is why I think former SSB President insisted on 2024 date)

But if you have such a lack of trust in the higher authority of the most important institution (TAI) and think everything is highly politicized, how do you expect it to successfully deliver a porgram like KAAN? (Because it isn't about the talent, many countries has enough of it. It is much more about state's willingness, initiative and the competence of high-level management who puts everything together in the end)
People insisted on trusting Temel Kotil over İsmail Demir, I really appreciated Demir's realistic attitude and level headed explanations. You can look up posts that go like "Do you know better than Temel Kotil" and turned into an argument. At the of the day it is better to be level headed and not trust everything said at face value. This is also a problem for our planners and military where unrealistic timelines can result in incorrect decision making. It's less important for us in the forums
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,909
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
This is also a problem for our planners and military where unrealistic timelines can result in incorrect decision making.
This is my problem with the way they handled Kaan's first flight, on top of other big and unnecessary statements. We need to plant our feet firmly on the ground and be realistic on our timelines and goals. If we surpass them, more power to us, but daydreaming about things that are borderline impossible gets us nothing, only wastes our limited resources. I don't want empty promises and false dreams, nor do we really need them, what we need is proper planning and clever use of our resources.
 

2033

Active member
Messages
80
Reactions
2 183
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Holy Cow! People are acting like they have access to TUSAS management board and know everything.

Lockheed Martin just missed the previously declared delivery date of F-35 block 4 TR-3. It has been prosponded by several months.

These kind of delay in such a highly complex and complicated program is a frequent occurrence.

I agree, Kotil shouldn't have Gave a date, that TAI may or may not able to keep. It is always wise to play safe in these stuff. (That is why I think former SSB President insisted on 2024 date)

But if you have such a lack of trust in the higher authority of the most important institution (TAI) and think everything is highly politicized, how do you expect it to successfully deliver a porgram like KAAN? (Because it isn't about the talent, many countries has enough of it. It is much more about state's willingness, initiative and the competence of high-level management who puts everything together in the end)
Temel Kotil placed Turkish Airlines among the top 10 in the world. He is truly a very successful person. But even he doesn't believe that Kaan will fly with a domestic engine in 2028.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
538
Reactions
9 697
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Has the government turned the maiden flight date into a political event or are there engineering reasons for delaying? If timing of the maiden flight is geared to the upcoming election, does every day first flight is postponed delay completion of development by a day? I imagine that development work on systems in the aircraft that are not directly related to flight performance data will not be impacted.
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,293
Reactions
96 11,829
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The maiden flight schedules of the Hürjet and Anka-3 were also slightly delayed. There were other examples also, both on the unmanned and manned aviation side. My understanding is that the political will has always pressuring TAI, especially in terms of the timetable. The KAAN program is a pinnacle that goes far beyond other previous indigenous TAI projects, and if it had made its first flight on December 27, it would have been an extraordinary achievement for me. If this target is reached in Q1 or Q2 2024, I will still count it as an extraordinary achievement. Looking back, the fact that the program was brought from scratch to this point in such a tight schedule and budget is enough to give me great confidence in my country's aviation industry.
 
Last edited:

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
538
Reactions
9 697
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Temel Kotil placed Turkish Airlines among the top 10 in the world. He is truly a very successful person. But even he doesn't believe that Kaan will fly with a domestic engine in 2028.
Does anybody seriously believe that Kaan will fly with a domestic engine before the 2030's? The 2028 target is based on what? Optimism of the most extreme order, I think. Or nothing at all - just a convenient, fictitious date.

Is there some need to convey the impression that if the US blocked F110 supplies due to political differences, it would not cripple the programme since Turkiye would only need it during the prototype development and testing phase?
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,293
Reactions
96 11,829
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Does anybody seriously believe that Kaan will fly with a domestic engine before the 2030's? The 2028 target is based on what? Optimism of the most extreme order, I think. Or nothing at all - just a convenient, fictitious date.

Is there some need to convey the impression that if the US blocked F110 supplies due to political differences, it would not cripple the programme since Turkiye would only need it during the prototype development and testing phase?
The target of delivering first MMU KAANs to TAF in 2028 is based on statements by senior officials or agency officials responsible for the program. So it is not based on the assumptions of defense aviation enthusiasts. Whether this target can be realized or not is a matter of debate, but almost all of the dates we discuss in these pages have official references. Although the program is open to the public, it has become largely confidential with the detailed design and prototype manufacturing process. While it is open source information that shapes our ideas on the subject, I think the increasingly closed form of the program makes it difficult to predict the future.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,341
Reactions
79 10,723
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Does anybody seriously believe that Kaan will fly with a domestic engine before the 2030's? The 2028 target is based on what? Optimism of the most extreme order, I think. Or nothing at all - just a convenient, fictitious date.

Is there some need to convey the impression that if the US blocked F110 supplies due to political differences, it would not cripple the programme since Turkiye would only need it during the prototype development and testing phase?
I'm still of the opinion that a license built F110(T110), very much can be called a domestic engine.
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,293
Reactions
96 11,829
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
This issue of delays is also, in my opinion, a very relative area of discussion. Depending on how we look at it, it can be defined as a major failure or within acceptable limits. Judging by the current procurement plans of the Air Force, we are preparing for many possibilities. Can a few months or a calendar year be considered a serious delay in these mega-scale multidisciplinary engineering programs, or is it within acceptable margins? To use a cliché, the difficulties faced by India, which started much earlier than us, are an obvious example. In general, I believe that TAI has succeeded in achieving a performance that has surprised most of the authorities in the world. And sooner or later they will reach the mass production target in this program. Because this program is no longer a technological demonstration or an experiment, it has become a necessity directly related to the survival of the country. The air force can create time with stop-gap solutions, but for the next big step, the Turkish air force now has no alternative.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
538
Reactions
9 697
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Perhaps this 2028 'fly on Kaan' date means using a Kaan as a flying testbed (1 x F110 + 1 x T35kN)?
 

Merzifonlu

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
716
Reactions
25 2,154
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Perhaps this 2028 'fly on Kaan' date means using a Kaan as a flying testbed (1 x F110 + 1 x T35kN)?
If the domestic engine is produced by that date and operates with sufficient reliability, yes, it will be tested by installing it on the one of prototype KAAN together with the F110.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,683
Reactions
7 7,389
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Perhaps this 2028 'fly on Kaan' date means using a Kaan as a flying testbed (1 x F110 + 1 x T35kN)?
The latest statement is that they are trying to make the engine ready for when Kaan is ready for serial production. If you draw a timeline back towards today you can workout an engine roadmap leading to that time-frame.
 

DBdev

Committed member
Messages
298
Reactions
8 522
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Perhaps this 2028 'fly on Kaan' date means using a Kaan as a flying testbed (1 x F110 + 1 x T35kN)?
That's not how engines work. You can't synchronize or control 2 different engines without destroying the plane. It is tricky as it gets when its the same make and model.
 
Top Bottom