Both. Please read the provided link.Appreciate The UAV has Synthetic Aperture Sonar or side scan sonar?
Both. Please read the provided link.Appreciate The UAV has Synthetic Aperture Sonar or side scan sonar?
Cotton Candy Cruise Missile.
I'm sorry was this already posted? If not how have 7 hours passed without anyone seeing this?
Thought @Anmdt had already mentioned this several times over the last year.
… with some hidden cables, color leds and lot of airbrush touchesCotton Candy Cruise Missile.
I wonder if this project will turn into Turkey's version of the ghost shark submarine.The awaited moment has come!
National Unmanned Soldier to the Depths of the Blue Homeland: #STMNETA
#MilliMühendislik The work of our power, the first member of our Unmanned Autonomous Underwater family, STM NETA 300, will undertake the protection of the depths in #MaviVatan thanks to its modular and flexible design, high level of autonomy, and unique software! STM NETA's first operational mission will be the detection of mines.
I knew that design was too high poly for a simple ad for an another product.Meanwhile we have seen STM's bid for the Mine Hunter Vessel, lost to Dearsan design;
Both. Please read the provided link.
I don’t know which one is which but at the risk of derailing the subject, I must say that the top one looks like a WW2 vessel. It looks like Coustea’s Calypso tbhView attachment 71354
Meanwhile we have seen STM's bid for the Mine Hunter Vessel, lost to Dearsan design;
View attachment 71355
STM seems to have provisioned a hangar like structure behind the exhaust pipes to store both the USVs and UAVs, while the rear part seems elegant, the fore section and mast seems out of the date. The requirements are unclear but assuming that STM had some insider information, we may see similar adjustments on the Dearsan's design.
I remembered the discussions on old forums about the vertical launch system can not be suit on attack submarines .I think it's very meaningful why so much smoke effect used in the display of the missile.
Was it confirmed before that this gun is also capable of air defence duties?MKEK's Denizhan 76/62mm National Naval Gun (NNG could be nice code btw) will be deployed on MİLGEM İstif class 9-10-11-12.
A Supply Agreement for 4 set of Denizhan 76/62mm National Naval Guns was signed between MKE and TAIS – OG and STM partnership.
Not as SR, but yes limitedly thanks to TAKS (GFCS).Was it confirmed before that this gun is also capable of air defence duties?
Thanks mate, just saw that MKE mentioned it as anti-air as well, so I got curious. I wonder how capable it'll be in that role.Not as SR, but yes limitedly thanks to TAKS (GFCS).
I don't know the exact figures for the gun or the type of the shell, but Super Rapid used to be considered as a limited but purposed CIWS and AD gun.Thanks mate, just saw that MKE mentioned it as anti-air as well, so I got curious. I wonder how capable it'll be in that role.
Having clarified that point, it would be nice to know, if you would bring some light to the very fact that, why we are pursuing an inferior gun for our second batch of I-Class frigates. Would it not be more feasible to ask MKE to develop our “Super-Rapid” version?I don't know the exact figures for the gun or the type of the shell, but Super Rapid used to be considered as a limited but purposed CIWS and AD gun.
But with no matching to the SR's rate of fire and lack of programmable / fused shells, MKE 76mm will have a very limited capability in that purpose.