T
TR_123456
Guest
The problem is that we dont have the luxury to send 2 TF-2000's with the battle/strike group,we need a frigate like the Italian Multipurpose Combat Ship Raimondo Montecuccoli.
''If they decide'' is not good enough.
Latest Thread
The problem is that we dont have the luxury to send 2 TF-2000's with the battle/strike group,we need a frigate like the Italian Multipurpose Combat Ship Raimondo Montecuccoli.
I totally agree with you. An inadequate independent task force is not acceptable.The problem is that we dont have the luxury to send 2 TF-2000's with the battle/strike group,we need a frigate like the Italian Multipurpose Combat Ship Raimondo Montecuccoli.
''If they decide'' is not good enough/
Dont we need the 4/5k ton frigates if we want to become a ''blue water'' navy?
Lets face it ,TF-2000 alone wont cut it.
AC,2 TF-2000,1/2 Milden,1 LSS and then what?
The old OHP's?
How to form a battle group?
Here is the Queen Elizabeth-class carrier group;Dont we need the 4/5k ton frigates if we want to become a ''blue water'' navy?
Lets face it ,TF-2000 alone wont cut it.
AC,2 TF-2000,1/2 Milden,1 LSS and then what?
The old OHP's?
How to form a battle group?
That looks to me like it is just what Royal Navy sends, however, they either sail with ships from Netherlands or other NATO countries. In fact, UK literally has an agreement about it with Netherlands. It has been a point of contention that Royal Navy couldn't protect its ACs without putting much of its surface ships around them.Here is the Queen Elizabeth-class carrier group;
2+ escorts (Type 45 destroyer and Type 23 frigate); 1+ replenishment; 1+ Astute/Trafalgar-class attack submarine
So our carrier group can be ; 1 A/C , 1 TF2000, 1 ASW frigate (or Ada/I- Class until a more capable one is available ), 1 milden, 1 Dimdeg.
So really we need a very good 5K ton frigate that specialises in ASW.
You are correct that there is an agreement between the UK and Dutch navies for the Dutch ships to accompany UK Carrier strike groups in return for the UK to provide A/C strike group cover to the Dutch. This way UK strike group protects Netherlands and by using Dutch ships, releasing UK warships for other duties. Hence saving money and resources.That looks to me like it is just what Royal Navy sends, however, they either sail with ships from Netherlands or other NATO countries. In fact, UK literally has an agreement about it with Netherlands. It has been a point of contention that Royal Navy couldn't protect its ACs without putting much of its surface ships around them.
We might not have that luxury ourselves, so we have to be able to provide protection closer to US level by ourselves, otherwise we might as well paint a big target on each side of the AC.
I'd like to point out that this is before use of drones and ucavs became so widespread. Whilst I don't think anyone will question the bare minimum I think it's important to have contingency of sorts for the new type of threat that has appeared. Like is USV and suchYou are correct that there is an agreement between the UK and Dutch navies for the Dutch ships to accompany UK Carrier strike groups in return for the UK to provide A/C strike group cover to the Dutch. This way UK strike group protects Netherlands and by using Dutch ships, releasing UK warships for other duties. Hence saving money and resources.
But below at the bottom is another document published by the Royal Navy site itself, that clearly states that their strike group consists of:
1 x A/C
2 x type 23 class frigates for hunting submarines
1 x type 45 class destroyer for air defence
1 x Astute Class Nuclear powered strike submarine
They also depend on their air wing group like f35s to provide protection. Also with Merlin helicopters and P8 maritime patrol aircraft’s.
View attachment 72690
This is the bare bones of a strike group.
In the event of war, a carrier group may consist of more ships to project force in abundance. That is why US and Dutch ships are needed to constitute a task force formed around the Carrier.
Take look at the picture below where a task force has been formed for exercises to project force.
View attachment 72691
I hadn't noticed that, see Istanbul's light ASM load. Presumably only 8 in a 4x2 configuration instead of 4x4. And judging by the safety circle/rectangle around the gun on Hisar, are we sure if the gun make a full 360 degree traverse when on standby position and not hit the emplacement behind it? Looks like barrel needs to be raised to complete a full traverse.We can see the empty area behind tge mast of hisar class where the Hisar O type missiles can be placed and antiship missiles .
View attachment 72696
I hadn't noticed that, see Istanbul's light ASM load. Presumably only 8 in a 4x2 configuration instead of 4x4. And judging by the safety circle/rectangle around the gun on Hisar, are we sure if the gun make a full 360 degree traverse when on standby position and not hit the emplacement behind it? Looks like barrel needs to be raised to complete a full traverse.
View attachment 72697
There were news month ago that Turkish navy wants more LCT and Anti mine warfare ships so i think its for Our NavyMeanwhile, second Istif class frigate TCG İzmir's construction continues. And I believe one of the new LCT's can be seen on the right. Unsure if it's for export or DzKK use.
![]()
A deal was also signed by Anadolu with an "unnamed African country" to supply to 2 LCTs in 2 years in 2023.There were news month ago that Turkish navy wants more LCT and Anti mine warfare ships so i think its for Our Navy
www.defenceturk.net
We're selling ships to one of the most important sailor nations in the world.
Think of TF-2000 as a three-block program. Currently we are preparing for construction of 4 that will make the middle-tier AAW Destroyer functions. It will have a block with less weapon, sensors and multi-mission capabilities (through a multi-mission bay) version and an enlarged higher block version with more sensors, and better EW capability.Dont we need the 4/5k ton frigates if we want to become a ''blue water'' navy?
Lets face it ,TF-2000 alone wont cut it.
AC,2 TF-2000,1/2 Milden,1 LSS and then what?
The old OHP's?
How to form a battle group?
The outfitting is the most difficult stage of all. Looking at these pictures, I can't figure out if they have used fitted out blocks like Istanbul Naval Shipyard is capable of. I would say towards the end of the year we can see them fully outfitted and delivered to Navy in H1, and H2 2026 (or more like not commissioned but manned by Navy) and H1 2027 for the third. 6 months off seems plausible to me. Add 6 to 12 months per ship for sea trials and testing. 6 months offset is considered necessary due to logistics and manning the process of equipment installation / outfitting, port acceptance tests and so on.TCG Izmit (Third Ship)
TCG Izmir (Second Ship)
@Anmdt
With the speed these are being built could we see them being handed over to the Navy for tests next year?
| #Hull | Sails at (Sea Trial) | Commissioned |
| 1st | H1 2026 | H1 2027 |
| 2nd | H2 2026 | H2 2027 |
| 3rd | H1 2027 | H1 2028 |
| 4th | H2 2027 | H2 2028 |
| 5th | H1 2028 | H1 2029 |
| 6th | H2 2028 | H2 2029 |
| 7th | H1 2029 | H1 2030 |
The outfitting is the most difficult stage of all. Looking at these pictures, I can't figure out if they have used fitted out blocks like Istanbul Naval Shipyard is capable of. I would say towards the end of the year we can see them fully outfitted and delivered to Navy in H1, and H2 2026 (or more like not commissioned but manned by Navy) and H1 2027 for the third. 6 months off seems plausible to me. Add 6 to 12 months per ship for sea trials and testing. 6 months offset is considered necessary due to logistics and manning the process of equipment installation / outfitting, port acceptance tests and so on.
So approximately:
#Hull Sails at (Sea Trial) Commissioned 1st H1 2026 H1 2027 2nd H2 2026 H2 2027 3rd H1 2027 H1 2028 4th H2 2027 H2 2028 5th H1 2028 H1 2029 6th H2 2028 H2 2029 7th H1 2029 H1 2030