• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR Navy Naval Programs

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

April 2023, all three ships’ steel cutting was done at the same time. It was then stated by RTE that within 36 months all 3 ships would be delivered to the Navy. According to this statement the 1st, 2nd and 3rd ships on your list, all should be delivered to the navy before April 2026. (the attached X message actually states that the first 3 ships will be delivered in 2026. Remaining ship to be delivered in 2027)

I wonder if those pictures are old and dated. And in reality the production is far ahead of what is portrayed in the pictures!

View attachment 72766
Intrinsically i have introduced a year delay and haven't assumed all three ships can be simultaneously outfitted. If all three shipyards are capable of carrying out simultaneous outfitting and organization of logistics and integration of components then the dates are achievable by maximum a year delay. As in, 2027 for first three, 2028-2029H1 for remaining 4 is safely achievable.

We are highly benefiting from utilizing resources of three separate shipyards and STM's expertise in logistics management. But could they manage limited subcontractors on specialized fields, or could they find alternatives to certain ones? Could manufacturers of components catch up with the schedule and so on. Seeing Izmir / Izmit's progress will tell us about the rest, imo. I can't see it yet.
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
701
Reactions
3 30 1,432
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey

Unbelievable they really want free ships, the US American is not master of their own country and politics.
The whole system is run by Armenians, Greeks or Jews. If I were the Americans I would make it clear that the United States is not a proxy of country XY just because some of your people live here. That was a big mistake that the majority of the turkish diaspora did not go to America but to Germany which has absolutely no weight.
 
Last edited:

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,086
Reactions
12 3,864
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey

Unbelievable they really want free ships, the US American is not master of their own country and politics.
The whole system is run by Armenians, Greeks or Jews. If I were the Americans I would make it clear that the United States is not a proxy of country XY just because some of your people live here. That was a big mistake that the majority of the turkish diaspora did not go to America but to Germany which has absolutely no weight.

Not quite, these are ships that the navy doesn't want.

It's not that the US gives away active ships. In fact the engine condition is such that even Griks reject them, go figure
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,271
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,661
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Not quite, these are ships that the navy doesn't want.

It's not that the US gives away active ships. In fact the engine condition is such that even Griks reject them, go figure
This wouldn't have been the first time they get something US decided to discard, they got bloody amphibious vehicles that drowned US marines because they were free.
 

CAN_TR

Experienced member
Messages
1,618
Reactions
26 5,683
Nation of residence
Latvia
Nation of origin
Turkey
  • MLU Barbaros-class TCG Orucreis (F245)
  • Yavus-class TCG Turgutreis (F241)
  • Kemalreis (F247) belongs to the subclass (Salihreis) of the Barbaros-class

For those who didn't knew the Barbaros-class are made of two MEKO 200 TN Track II-A and two Track II-B, the Track II-B are classified as Salihreis.

1734719692936.png
 

BalkanTurk90

Contributor
Messages
921
Reactions
5 1,355
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
  • MLU Barbaros-class TCG Orucreis (F245)
  • Yavus-class TCG Turgutreis (F241)
  • Kemalreis (F247) belongs to the subclass (Salihreis) of the Barbaros-class

For those who didn't knew the Barbaros-class are made of two MEKO 200 TN Track II-A and two Track II-B, the Track II-B are classified as Salihreis.

View attachment 72775
What about other MLU of barbaros class ? 5+ years and only 1 ship modernised ?!
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,193
Reactions
127 19,055
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What's that? We need a new glossary for all these, it's getting harder to catch up...
-
We knew for some time Dearsan was awarded the next 4 Hisar Class OPVs, but here's a confirmation from İbrahim Sünnetçi as well.
"DEARSAN was assigned as the Main Contractor in the HİSAR Class ADKG and National Mine Hunting Ship Projects within the framework of the SSİK Decision."

sZZdlAS.jpeg
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What's that? We need a new glossary for all these, it's getting harder to catch up...
-
We knew for some time Dearsan was awarded the next 4 Hisar Class OPVs, but here's a confirmation from İbrahim Sünnetçi as well.
"DEARSAN was assigned as the Main Contractor in the HİSAR Class ADKG and National Mine Hunting Ship Projects within the framework of the SSİK Decision."

sZZdlAS.jpeg
NG-Mine Hunter
Last time i talked with someone from DzKK i heard that both MH and MCMV was alive. Now i am wondering if they restructured the future plans and merged those two into what we see from Dearsan.

OPV is given as 2 and plus 2 options. I hope they will realize remaining 2 options in the following years.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Moderator
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,857
Reactions
67 22,002
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Good news, but those German tech stuff sound omnious. Don't we have our own projects on potential replacements in case we get hit by another embargo ?
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,587
Reactions
60 10,080
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
NG-Mine Hunter
Last time i talked with someone from DzKK i heard that both MH and MCMV was alive. Now i am wondering if they restructured the future plans and merged those two into what we see from Dearsan.

OPV is given as 2 and plus 2 options. I hope they will realize remaining 2 options in the following years.
What's the difference between the two?
Don't they basically have the same purpose?
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,193
Reactions
127 19,055
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
It should be Sancar, as it was the one that had mine countermeasure mentioned among its missions on SSB's website; unless something changed since they updated it, of course.
Possible but one shown on the model is the Marlin without the "catamaran addons".
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What's the difference between the two?
Don't they basically have the same purpose?
Technically, yes, they have overlapping purposes, and Mine Hunters are the past, while Countermeasure Ships are the future trend.

In practice, however, hunters tend to be more agile and maneuverable, made of non-magnetic steel, with tighter operational noise levels and special materials, designed to enter mined areas and keep them clean. While countermeasure vessels do the same but are made larger, less agile, classic materials and less complexity, more equipment and often keeps a distance to mined areas and use auxiliaries to reach.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,587
Reactions
60 10,080
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Technically, yes, they have overlapping purposes, and Mine Hunters are the past, while Countermeasure Ships are the future trend.

In practice, however, hunters tend to be more agile and maneuverable, made of non-magnetic steel, with tighter operational noise levels and special materials, designed to enter mined areas and keep them clean. While countermeasure vessels do the same but are made larger, less agile, classic materials and less complexity, more equipment and often keeps a distance to mined areas and use auxiliaries to reach.
Thanks for the clarification, mate!
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,587
Reactions
60 10,080
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
The first domestic Yaw Damping System, designed and produced by STM with national resources in Turkey, received its product certificate from Türk Loydu, a certification body that is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS).



Roll Damping System of surface warships; It ensures that the platforms continue their combat missions safely under adverse environmental conditions by absorbing the forces they are exposed to due to external factors such as wind, waves, currents and storms. 🌊



The Roll Damping System, which we developed in cooperation with Robotek, accompanies the challenging missions of our national warships.⚓



🔗https://stm.com.tr/tr/medya/haberle...pa-sonumlerim-sistemi-urun-sertifikasini-aldi

 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,193
Reactions
127 19,055
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Finally our first look to the new MCMV. I'm seeing a Marlin USV!

Another slide previously unseen showing the mission loadout of the MCMV. Multiple types of UUVs, ability to carry 2 USVs as well as 2 RHIBs.

1735480008279.png



Also an infographic detailing the weapon loadout for the Hisar Class OPVs, which have some very interesting changes, which does make me curious. First is the MIDLAS VLS placement instead of an actual Hisar/Sapan launcher akin to a ground based launcher. Second is the pedestal launcher behind the main gun. This location was shown as a place to install missile launchers like Yalman in the past to install missiles like Umtas-GM for engagements up to 30kms but on this version it's shown with Roketsan's ASW rocket launcher like on the Tuzla class boats. Very interesting. @Anmdt


8f3DFdt.jpeg
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Another slide previously unseen showing the mission loadout of the MCMV. Multiple types of UUVs, ability to carry 2 USVs as well as 2 RHIBs.

View attachment 72906


Also an infographic detailing the weapon loadout for the Hisar Class OPVs, which have some very interesting changes, which does make me curious. First is the MIDLAS VLS placement instead of an actual Hisar/Sapan launcher akin to a ground based launcher. Second is the pedestal launcher behind the main gun. This location was shown as a place to install missile launchers like Yalman in the past to install missiles like Umtas-GM for engagements up to 30kms but on this version it's shown with Roketsan's ASW rocket launcher like on the Tuzla class boats. Very interesting. @Anmdt


8f3DFdt.jpeg
Two changes from Asfat's design;
Tübitak Yelkovan is replaced by Aselsan ARES-2N/L (also being used on Qatari FACM)
Unirobotics stabilized* gun replaced by Aselsan STAMP

This is not certain, Dearsan does not have authority to change suppliers, all is predefined by SSB.
 
Top Bottom