TR Naval Programs

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Dont we need the 4/5k ton frigates if we want to become a ''blue water'' navy?
Lets face it ,TF-2000 alone wont cut it.
AC,2 TF-2000,1/2 Milden,1 LSS and then what?
The old OHP's?
How to form a battle group?
Think of TF-2000 as a three-block program. Currently we are preparing for construction of 4 that will make the middle-tier AAW Destroyer functions. It will have a block with less weapon, sensors and multi-mission capabilities (through a multi-mission bay) version and an enlarged higher block version with more sensors, and better EW capability.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
TCG Izmit (Third Ship)


TCG Izmir (Second Ship)


@Anmdt
With the speed these are being built could we see them being handed over to the Navy for tests next year?
The outfitting is the most difficult stage of all. Looking at these pictures, I can't figure out if they have used fitted out blocks like Istanbul Naval Shipyard is capable of. I would say towards the end of the year we can see them fully outfitted and delivered to Navy in H1, and H2 2026 (or more like not commissioned but manned by Navy) and H1 2027 for the third. 6 months off seems plausible to me. Add 6 to 12 months per ship for sea trials and testing. 6 months offset is considered necessary due to logistics and manning the process of equipment installation / outfitting, port acceptance tests and so on.

So approximately:
#HullSails at (Sea Trial)Commissioned
1stH1 2026H1 2027
2ndH2 2026H2 2027
3rdH1 2027H1 2028
4thH2 2027H2 2028
5thH1 2028H1 2029
6thH2 2028H2 2029
7thH1 2029H1 2030
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,276
Reactions
147 16,477
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
The outfitting is the most difficult stage of all. Looking at these pictures, I can't figure out if they have used fitted out blocks like Istanbul Naval Shipyard is capable of. I would say towards the end of the year we can see them fully outfitted and delivered to Navy in H1, and H2 2026 (or more like not commissioned but manned by Navy) and H1 2027 for the third. 6 months off seems plausible to me. Add 6 to 12 months per ship for sea trials and testing. 6 months offset is considered necessary due to logistics and manning the process of equipment installation / outfitting, port acceptance tests and so on.

So approximately:
#HullSails at (Sea Trial)Commissioned
1stH1 2026H1 2027
2ndH2 2026H2 2027
3rdH1 2027H1 2028
4thH2 2027H2 2028
5thH1 2028H1 2029
6thH2 2028H2 2029
7thH1 2029H1 2030

April 2023, all three ships’ steel cutting was done at the same time. It was then stated by RTE that within 36 months all 3 ships would be delivered to the Navy. According to this statement the 1st, 2nd and 3rd ships on your list, all should be delivered to the navy before April 2026. (the attached X message actually states that the first 3 ships will be delivered in 2026. Remaining ship to be delivered in 2027)

I wonder if those pictures are old and dated. And in reality the production is far ahead of what is portrayed in the pictures!

1734638032797.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

April 2023, all three ships’ steel cutting was done at the same time. It was then stated by RTE that within 36 months all 3 ships would be delivered to the Navy. According to this statement the 1st, 2nd and 3rd ships on your list, all should be delivered to the navy before April 2026. (the attached X message actually states that the first 3 ships will be delivered in 2026. Remaining ship to be delivered in 2027)

I wonder if those pictures are old and dated. And in reality the production is far ahead of what is portrayed in the pictures!

View attachment 72766
Intrinsically i have introduced a year delay and haven't assumed all three ships can be simultaneously outfitted. If all three shipyards are capable of carrying out simultaneous outfitting and organization of logistics and integration of components then the dates are achievable by maximum a year delay. As in, 2027 for first three, 2028-2029H1 for remaining 4 is safely achievable.

We are highly benefiting from utilizing resources of three separate shipyards and STM's expertise in logistics management. But could they manage limited subcontractors on specialized fields, or could they find alternatives to certain ones? Could manufacturers of components catch up with the schedule and so on. Seeing Izmir / Izmit's progress will tell us about the rest, imo. I can't see it yet.
 

IC3M@N FX

Committed member
Messages
259
Reactions
13 553
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey

Unbelievable they really want free ships, the US American is not master of their own country and politics.
The whole system is run by Armenians, Greeks or Jews. If I were the Americans I would make it clear that the United States is not a proxy of country XY just because some of your people live here. That was a big mistake that the majority of the turkish diaspora did not go to America but to Germany which has absolutely no weight.
 
Last edited:

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,020
Reactions
8 3,645
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey

Unbelievable they really want free ships, the US American is not master of their own country and politics.
The whole system is run by Armenians, Greeks or Jews. If I were the Americans I would make it clear that the United States is not a proxy of country XY just because some of your people live here. That was a big mistake that the majority of the turkish diaspora did not go to America but to Germany which has absolutely no weight.

Not quite, these are ships that the navy doesn't want.

It's not that the US gives away active ships. In fact the engine condition is such that even Griks reject them, go figure
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,447
Solutions
1
Reactions
17 4,043
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Not quite, these are ships that the navy doesn't want.

It's not that the US gives away active ships. In fact the engine condition is such that even Griks reject them, go figure
This wouldn't have been the first time they get something US decided to discard, they got bloody amphibious vehicles that drowned US marines because they were free.
 

CAN_TR

Contributor
Messages
1,482
Reactions
17 5,221
Nation of residence
Austria
Nation of origin
Turkey
  • MLU Barbaros-class TCG Orucreis (F245)
  • Yavus-class TCG Turgutreis (F241)
  • Kemalreis (F247) belongs to the subclass (Salihreis) of the Barbaros-class

For those who didn't knew the Barbaros-class are made of two MEKO 200 TN Track II-A and two Track II-B, the Track II-B are classified as Salihreis.

1734719692936.png
 

BalkanTurk90

Contributor
Messages
684
Reactions
5 1,070
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
  • MLU Barbaros-class TCG Orucreis (F245)
  • Yavus-class TCG Turgutreis (F241)
  • Kemalreis (F247) belongs to the subclass (Salihreis) of the Barbaros-class

For those who didn't knew the Barbaros-class are made of two MEKO 200 TN Track II-A and two Track II-B, the Track II-B are classified as Salihreis.

View attachment 72775
What about other MLU of barbaros class ? 5+ years and only 1 ship modernised ?!
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,482
Reactions
84 11,390
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What's that? We need a new glossary for all these, it's getting harder to catch up...
-
We knew for some time Dearsan was awarded the next 4 Hisar Class OPVs, but here's a confirmation from İbrahim Sünnetçi as well.
"DEARSAN was assigned as the Main Contractor in the HİSAR Class ADKG and National Mine Hunting Ship Projects within the framework of the SSİK Decision."

sZZdlAS.jpeg
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What's that? We need a new glossary for all these, it's getting harder to catch up...
-
We knew for some time Dearsan was awarded the next 4 Hisar Class OPVs, but here's a confirmation from İbrahim Sünnetçi as well.
"DEARSAN was assigned as the Main Contractor in the HİSAR Class ADKG and National Mine Hunting Ship Projects within the framework of the SSİK Decision."

sZZdlAS.jpeg
NG-Mine Hunter
Last time i talked with someone from DzKK i heard that both MH and MCMV was alive. Now i am wondering if they restructured the future plans and merged those two into what we see from Dearsan.

OPV is given as 2 and plus 2 options. I hope they will realize remaining 2 options in the following years.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,775
Reactions
37 20,048
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Good news, but those German tech stuff sound omnious. Don't we have our own projects on potential replacements in case we get hit by another embargo ?
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,080
Reactions
27 8,772
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
NG-Mine Hunter
Last time i talked with someone from DzKK i heard that both MH and MCMV was alive. Now i am wondering if they restructured the future plans and merged those two into what we see from Dearsan.

OPV is given as 2 and plus 2 options. I hope they will realize remaining 2 options in the following years.
What's the difference between the two?
Don't they basically have the same purpose?
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,482
Reactions
84 11,390
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
It should be Sancar, as it was the one that had mine countermeasure mentioned among its missions on SSB's website; unless something changed since they updated it, of course.
Possible but one shown on the model is the Marlin without the "catamaran addons".
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What's the difference between the two?
Don't they basically have the same purpose?
Technically, yes, they have overlapping purposes, and Mine Hunters are the past, while Countermeasure Ships are the future trend.

In practice, however, hunters tend to be more agile and maneuverable, made of non-magnetic steel, with tighter operational noise levels and special materials, designed to enter mined areas and keep them clean. While countermeasure vessels do the same but are made larger, less agile, classic materials and less complexity, more equipment and often keeps a distance to mined areas and use auxiliaries to reach.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom