You clearly have a marked hatred for Alabama. It is a haven of peace and contentment, next to the UP.What the deal with UP? Has it always been this crazy? It's like the Alabama of India.
You clearly have a marked hatred for Alabama. It is a haven of peace and contentment, next to the UP.What the deal with UP? Has it always been this crazy? It's like the Alabama of India.
Thanks for the reminder.It’s a ridiculous law, but I don’t think I need to point this out. Next is Muslims aren’t allowed to marry.
The ease of doing business ranking was largely manipulated by looking at the metrics used for the ranking and fine tuning them in Bombay and Delhi.It will take a lot to unpack, there have been several economic reforms and initiatives too given the larger context of what ails Indian economy. This is just tiny portion of it I go through here:
Indonesian Economy News and Updates
Talking about debts, our SOE total debt actually quite worrysome to me, but at least they are using it as funds for infrastructure Development and can be used as colateral bargaining chip. The plan was to take the loan to build jalan tol then sell it to investor. Im not sure how it goes today...defencehub.live
i.e if you look at FDI flows now (compared to end of UPA-II) and ease of doing business (that was huge part of the rut in UPA-II given the FPI flows dried up into capital market and there was no solid floorboard elsewhere to get into).
Similar things can be seen in manufacturing value added and other economic sectors structural rebound (from the 09 - 14 rut) evidenced by their production and export levels too. Its is ongoing project to make India more investment and supply chain friendly.
I like Modi's focus on things like sanitation (parameshwaran Iyer and UNICEF have spoke well on results) and public health too.
The recent agro reform push (against RSS policy on it) is expounded well by folks like Ashok Gulati and Montek Singh Ahulwalia (lest you call any of these modi toadies).
Lot of the better/good things of course need to be followed up and implemented well to be seen and judged completely with better facts (just like now there is good amount of time in rearview to judge UPA 1 and 2)
Demonetisation and consensus seeking for reforms has been pretty bad to terrible moves. There have been others too in this category (GST was mixed bag and messy).
Amit shah and lot of the bozo-thugs I disdain. Social side of things, I will get to later, BJP is pretty bad but its to be expected given their whole brand of political philosophy....this has carry over to consensus building.
I also disagree with Art 370 repeal being done well or effectively....given what needed to be done over much longer time period in Kashmir to develop it and gain trust of Kashmiri populace and then let them choose (given the initial agreement for Kashmir joining India) if they wanted a standardisation of constitution with rest of India.
I will revisit and add more details and debate over time to this thread. Maybe we can change title to a more nuanced Modi admin analysis etc. Depending how it goes (interest etc) it might get archived into indian politics thread as there is debate there already thats pretty similar.
I don't. It's the insult that Modi bhakts (fans) use for those Indians who reject their Hindutva agenda and ideology.@Jackdaws I wonder why you refer to secular Indians as "Sickulars"?
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you. No good results can be expected from a "Modi-Mind" India. In this case, the result of the West's effort to polish India against China will be disappointing.
The ease of doing business ranking was largely manipulated by looking at the metrics used for the ranking and fine tuning them in Bombay and Delhi.
On Article 370, someone had to bite the bullet at some point. The sooner it was done, the better. Pakistan is a pretty much an international pariah and the next Indian Govt. might be a coalition one where coalition compulsions might prevent the repeal.
If there had been a legitimate way to abolish 370, I'd have been standing placard in hand at the picket lines in front of Parliament urging it. My objection is to the way they did it, nefarious, dodgy and through a weird legislative bootstrapping that has a twisted, convoluted logic associated with the worst excesses of a particular type of reasoning associated with a particular type of eminent intellect in south Asia.I don't like it man (I had same gut instinct like yours initially), ever since @Joe Shearer pointed me to a brilliant professor/lawyer point by point dissection of it. i.e there were already clauses in Kashmir constitution to handle all manner of issues (equivalent to or sometimes even better and in more detail/optimisation than Indian constitution does). I waited patiently long enough for good counter by BJP side, none ever came that I could find.
The whole thing falls apart to me given Kashmir joined Indian union with explicit promise of Art. 370 (i.e JnK maintains its own constitution for the affairs delegated to its internal control)....
The state constituent assembly is not even there (dissolved since some year in the 50s) and its required to be there to give consent for repeal of Art. 370 is what my last understanding on the issue is (and Indian supreme court agreed thats the case just some years ago).
Or at least there need be some initial amendment transferring that process for repeal/abrogation to the kashmir legislative assembly to take on that consent role from their side or something like that....an intermediary step so JnK public have their represenatives to ok the matter as was the clear intent originally in Art. 370.
Again I defer to @Joe Shearer , he is probably the expert on this matter.
This repeal/abrogation was a typical bullying move to me...and the big damage has now been done, on top of the damage already done. I am not too optimistic on relations developing well between Kashmiris and rest of country like could have been done if simply you leave as is and improve bridge building and trust building in places it should be first....that is long term process.
It does not sit well with me because again I have studied such things like the federal govt structure in US, and the huge amount of rights they put into each state (if you look how US formed and expanded).
Or one can look at the constituent countries of the larger country that is the UK....the formation process (and thus legal ability to form separate parliaments and hold referendum etc) is very important.
To me JnK integration into India is similarly unique and should have been respected...because of that formation process of Indian union uniquely in case of JnK here (compared to rest of Indian union).
Oh, that is entirely correct. I was in the process of acquiring a law degree (which I did) when this happened - so had lots of spirited debates with professors and students in law college.I don't like it man (I had same gut instinct like yours initially), ever since @Joe Shearer pointed me to a brilliant professor/lawyer point by point dissection of it. i.e there were already clauses in Kashmir constitution to handle all manner of issues (equivalent to or sometimes even better and in more detail/optimisation than Indian constitution does). I waited patiently long enough for good counter by BJP side, none ever came that I could find.
The whole thing falls apart to me given Kashmir joined Indian union with explicit promise of Art. 370 (i.e JnK maintains its own constitution for the affairs delegated to its internal control)....
The state constituent assembly is not even there (dissolved since some year in the 50s) and its required to be there to give consent for repeal of Art. 370 is what my last understanding on the issue is (and Indian supreme court agreed thats the case just some years ago).
Or at least there need be some initial amendment transferring that process for repeal/abrogation to the kashmir legislative assembly to take on that consent role from their side or something like that....an intermediary step so JnK public have their represenatives to ok the matter as was the clear intent originally in Art. 370.
Again I defer to @Joe Shearer , he is probably the expert on this matter.
This repeal/abrogation was a typical bullying move to me...and the big damage has now been done, on top of the damage already done. I am not too optimistic on relations developing well between Kashmiris and rest of country like could have been done if simply you leave as is and improve bridge building and trust building in places it should be first....that is long term process.
It does not sit well with me because again I have studied such things like the federal govt structure in US, and the huge amount of rights they put into each state (if you look how US formed and expanded).
Or one can look at the constituent countries of the larger country that is the UK....the formation process (and thus legal ability to form separate parliaments and hold referendum etc) is very important.
To me JnK integration into India is similarly unique and should have been respected...because of that formation process of Indian union uniquely in case of JnK here (compared to rest of Indian union).