India Jet Engines and Gas Turbines

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,446
Reactions
132 21,168
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India

The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), India's premier defence research agency, is carrying out trials of the indigenously developed Kaveri jet engine in Russia and is planning to use it for powering the Made in India long-range Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV).

The Kaveri engine is undergoing detailed trials in Russia and there are around 25 hours of testing left to be done on it. The slots have to be given by the authorities, defence officials informed India Today TV.

The engine is planned to be used for powering the indigenous UCAV project, they said. Interest in the Kaveri engine has been revived as there is an ongoing trend in the Evian media, asking the government to #FundKaveri engine project.

(more at link)

 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,446
Reactions
132 21,168
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
792
Reactions
14 1,018
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
I note on another forum HAL Chief Sunil is due to retire April 2026. He will be determined to get this done before he goes, I guess.
 

Gessler

Contributor
Moderator
India Moderator
Messages
994
Reactions
54 2,296
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Looks like the Ministry of Defence has signaled its intent to move ahead with France's SAFRAN as a partner in the $7 billion program to develop a next-gen turbofan engine meant to go on AMCA Mk-2:

GwHT9f_WsAAFWzp.jpeg
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,446
Reactions
132 21,168
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,967
Reactions
100 9,600
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
I was wondering, given what's going on with Trump and stuff, will ToT for GE F414 be cancelled?
 

sup_lol

Active member
Messages
31
Reactions
1 26
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
I was wondering, given what's going on with Trump and stuff, will ToT for GE F414 be cancelled?
Nah, these two are not related, plus the deal for the ToT has alr been signed, the only things being discussed right now is the commercial establishment of the facility to manufacture these things.

The tariffs are not on the main exports of India(i.e pharma and electronics) so it shouldn't matter enough for a major defence deal like this.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,967
Reactions
100 9,600
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,446
Reactions
132 21,168
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India

As I suspected. Not ToT for American engine in current circumstances.

Nope that proceeds as is with the ToT involved in that deal, given the Tejas Mk2 and first tranche AMCA:


People don't understand what ToT is in the end. It is largely IP rights over capital machinery moved to facilities.

It is false to say there will be "no ToT" regd the GE-414 production within India to take place over next 10 years while the safran joint project develops and matures for the longer term.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,967
Reactions
100 9,600
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Nope that proceeds as is with the ToT involved in that deal, given the Tejas Mk2 and first tranche AMCA:


People don't understand what ToT is in the end. It is largely IP rights over capital machinery moved to facilities.

It is false to say there will be "no ToT" regd the GE-414 production within India to take place over next 10 years while the safran joint project develops and matures for the longer term.

Yeah, I missed the news. Last I read, there was talk ongoing.

Isn't ToT about secret
Super alloy formula? What do you mean by it is largely about IP rights over capital machineries?
 
Last edited:

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,446
Reactions
132 21,168
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
Yeah, I missed the news. Last I read, there was talk ongoing.

Isn't ToT about secret
Super alloy formula? What do you mean by it is largely about IP rights over capital machineries?

Any material can be analysed in various spectrometers for decades now....in fact major MRO in world has standard equipment for this (for on site assay, NDT etc).

So the formula is not really the secret for materials....the story of the metal filings sticking to Soviet shoes when they were allowed iirc to visit Whittle's (what would become RR) facility in UK post ww2 relative bonhomie. These can also be found fairly easily in literature too all over the place.

Rather it is the specific manufacture (tolerances, process control, RnD of the capital equipment, the engineers and technicians with expertise in their operation etc, the IP in every granular level of this) of the materials and components.

That is where IP rights come into play as to what is (relative to adjudged receiving party capacity to handle + absorb etc):

A) transferred (at once and then over a spread time integral too) and known/assumed to be readily fungible/transferable beyond it

B) what is licensed (i.e not further transferable and fungible to some degree stipulated) and need safeguards

C) not licensed (i.e IP firewalled) and needing more stringent safeguards (often no capital equipment + their knowhow + teams transferred essentially..... so components are directly imported)

Decent read (especially "Manufacturing challenges"):


Also a look into US-Japan in more granular detail during cold war regarding this (both for "40%" ToT engines for that time period and the larger airframe and aircraft systems etc too), when you have time to go through:


@Yasar_TR may find these of interest too.

Maybe later I will copy paste and post more on what I mean (especially from cold war era where the basis for today developed as it has) in the larger Jet Engine thread.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom