Live Conflict Ukraine-Russia War

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,289
Reactions
12 1,262
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
A Ukrainian Armed Forces soldier criticizes the defense line of the Sumy region. Footage shows a Ukrainian serviceman criticizing the dismissed head of the Sumy Military Administration, Valeriy Artyukh, for the defensive fortifications built in Ukraine's Sumy region. At first glance, the defensive line appears to be well-constructed, but it lacks bunkers and cover from drone strikes. Currently, such defensive fortifications cannot be used, as artillery and drones are currently the main threats. According to the author, 20 billion hryvnias were spent on the construction of Ukrainian fortifications, which translates to 475 million dollars.

 

FiReFTW

Committed member
Messages
187
Reactions
2 197
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Switzerland
I don't suggest that Russia will collapse into many nations. I have never thought or suggested that. I point out that government revenue - which already does not cover budgeted spending for 2025 - will be further reduced by the Rosneft and Lukoil sanctions. At best government revenue will be reduced due to having to sell 4 million bpd at a greater discount to world crude price.

The Russian government budgeted to spend around 500 billion USD in 2025. About 70 billion USD of that would come from Rosneft and Lukoil crude exports. Less than anticipated in the budget, due the expected price per barrel turning out to be lower than predicted.

I don't suggest that Russia will lose the war on the ground. I suggest that the goverrnment will not have the funds to continue fighting and for that reason will have to stop fighting. Unfortunately Putin has sacrificed the civil side of the economy to spending on the military side of the economy and, yes, parts of t he civil side of the economy are heading for collapse. It is already happening in the coal mining sector with predicted losses of 4 billion USD this year. Without financial support the sector should collapse. Companies that run at a loss shut down in the absence of financial support. Putin can choose to finance the sector but that is extra spending. I think he would rather save the money and spend it on the war.

My advice to Ukraine: keep fighting. Let Putin destroy more and more of the Russian civil economy and drain the government of funds.
I really am astonished by the self-destructive patterns that are going on in Europe right now, your mindset is a great example of what is going on in Europe in the past 10-15 years, the self-destructive actions and self-harming mindsets of so many european politicians.

Look at Trump, hes a m*ron but at least he is in it for the interests of the US, even if he risks relationships with allied countries. As long as the USA profits.

Europe being completely opposite to that is the reason why that Europe is failing and the economy is struggling and they have major issues competitive and otherwise. Because they do things that actively hurt their own economy and people.

Europe should care about their OWN PEOPLE not go against them.

I don't give 0 crap about Russia, if Russia is thriving or if Russia is destroying itself, I don't care, I care about my own country, my own continent, our people, our standard of living, I care about the best life for the people here.

But you and most of the european politicians who think very similar to you would rather see this war drag on ( and this war is just 1 example of many) just because you know the longer it drags on the more it hurts Russia and the more impact it will have on Russia... doesn't matter if its also impacting Europe and having a negative effect on Europe and our own people, as long as Russia is getting f*ked its fine, even if we are getting f*ked also in the process.

It really is astounding, really, I will simply never comprehend it.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
873
Reactions
14 1,135
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
I really am astonished by the self-destructive patterns that are going on in Europe right now, your mindset is a great example of what is going on in Europe in the past 10-15 years, the self-destructive actions and self-harming mindsets of so many european politicians.

Look at Trump, hes a m*ron but at least he is in it for the interests of the US, even if he risks relationships with allied countries. As long as the USA profits.

Europe being completely opposite to that is the reason why that Europe is failing and the economy is struggling and they have major issues competitive and otherwise. Because they do things that actively hurt their own economy and people.

Europe should care about their OWN PEOPLE not go against them.

I don't give 0 crap about Russia, if Russia is thriving or if Russia is destroying itself, I don't care, I care about my own country, my own continent, our people, our standard of living, I care about the best life for the people here.

But you and most of the european politicians who think very similar to you would rather see this war drag on ( and this war is just 1 example of many) just because you know the longer it drags on the more it hurts Russia and the more impact it will have on Russia... doesn't matter if its also impacting Europe and having a negative effect on Europe and our own people, as long as Russia is getting f*ked its fine, even if we are getting f*ked also in the process.

It really is astounding, really, I will simply never comprehend it.
I want Russia to be so badly damaged economically by this misguided invasion that it will not be in a position to start any more wars against its neighbours for a very long time. IMO after a month of war Putin should have accepted that the planned Blitzkrieg had failed and it was time to disentangle Russia from the situation.

Apart from the idea that aggressive bullies should not gain from behaving as such, a much weakened Russia would present far less of a threat to the EU countries bordering it. Investing 200 billion EUR or 400 billion EUR to achieve that would be worth the money. Investing 1%-2% of Europe's GDP in a single year to halt Russian aggression for many years would be a good investment to me.
 
Last edited:

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,577
Reactions
137 21,448
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
You know there is a pipeline from Russia to China,yes?
Gas and oil pipeline.


So,we agree on China but i dont think India can be pressured with the engines.
@Nilgiri bro,shed some light.

Yah, India is nuclear power with lot of missiles (and looking to get brahmos numbers from say 1500 deployed now to x2 or x3 with further upgrades).

The force levels there are magnitudes more in the end than new fighters (and the routes available switch to France, Russia for that for engines of course with the % penalties of course on time, performance what have you...or just buying/producing stopgap platforms away from Tejas which has 404 locked into it etc)

But those %'s are small costs and thus small leverage to bear in the overall force level going from say 2020s to 2030s to 2040s etc. i.e they are still important but only so much in grand scheme of things.

Sudden fighter jet engine sanctions would just damage relations (and end things like tthe Quad) but will do nothing on pressuring. India will simply hedge more with Russian military ecosystem. There is reason India felt most comfortable with Russia for the SSBN Arihant class consultancy and reactor minitaurisation help etc that followed smoothly from the SSN leasing from Russian navy too.

i.e there is proven track record of reliable you get what you pay for there and it was demonstrably not upset by any nuclear-test sanctions in 90s/2000s like US did (Russia voiced concerns thats it). In naval domain the Soviet admirral Gorshkov was instrumental in pushing this relationship with India to have a strategic longterm after the 1971 war (where the US was caught on the wrong side and forms some large part of continued Indian geopolitical memory and strategy).

The US approach to India will have to be bite sized, granular and direct. i.e if there is problem with Russia's oil trade with India, it will have to be consistent on it past India (with other heavy buyers like China, given China's large capital assistance to Russian military production by same argument past that).....and will have to first admit that the Janet Yellen policy under Biden with "we welcome India buying all it can from Russia under these price caps" is being reversed and why.

Then the oil sanctions on Russian producers directly (like done recently, after all the brouhaha drama that Trump is a Putin puppet and is heavily anti-Zelensky from earlier in the year) along with US own shale oil and gas supply expansion to Indian buyers is the way to go regarding precise carrot and stick that can work and is logical and predictable.

Transgressing to other domains will not work (like the 50% tarrif approach that Trump is TACO'ing on already) and will just invite more unreliablity + untrustworthiness in Indian elephant memory of American geopolitical strategy to add to the previous chapters.
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
10,577
Reactions
137 21,448
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
given China's large capital assistance to Russian military production

Google AI has this summary:

1761860869082.png
 

contricusc

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
732
Reactions
13 1,084
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
I don't give 0 crap about Russia, if Russia is thriving or if Russia is destroying itself, I don't care, I care about my own country, my own continent, our people, our standard of living, I care about the best life for the people here.

People in Eastern Europe care about Russia, and want to see it destroyed, for all the suffering it had inflicted on us. The destruction and dissolution of Russia would be a dream come true for many of us.

On top of that, we care about our security, and a weak Russia makes us safer, while a strong and emboldened Russia puts us at great risk of war.

But you and most of the european politicians who think very similar to you would rather see this war drag on ( and this war is just 1 example of many) just because you know the longer it drags on the more it hurts Russia and the more impact it will have on Russia... doesn't matter if its also impacting Europe and having a negative effect on Europe and our own people, as long as Russia is getting f*ked its fine, even if we are getting f*ked also in the process.

It really is astounding, really, I will simply never comprehend it.

Ever heard the expression “short term pain, for long term gain” ?

This is Europe’s situation now. It must endure short term pain to get rid of the Russian threat, and to destroy its arch-enemy. Helping Ukraine is a very cheap opportunity for Europe to break Russia and neutralize it.

We need Russia to break into smaller states, to be dirt poor and desperate for foreign investments and deals. We need a Russia that will be willing to sell its resources for nothing to foreign companies, and become a Euro-Chinese colony from an economical point of view.

Russia needs to be like Iraq or Venezuela. A toothless corrupt country that sells its resources and can’t threaten anyone.
 

Passenger

Member
Messages
12
Reactions
1 13
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Russia’s advance on Pokrovsk exposes Ukraine’s growing manpower crisis

As Russian troops close in on the strategically crucial city of Pokrovsk in eastern Ukraine, Kyiv’s growing manpower shortages are becoming more and more apparent. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated this week that Ukrainian troops on the Pokrovsk front are currently outnumbered eight to one by the Russian army, highlighting the scale of the problem. After three and a half years of heroic and exceptionally bloody resistance, the fear is that Ukraine may now be approaching the point when the country no longer has enough fighters to effectively defend the front lines of Europe’s largest war since World War II.

Ukraine’s mobilization challenges are no secret and have been steadily mounting for much of the war. During the initial days of the full-scale invasion in early 2022, an unprecedented flood of volunteers made it possible to dramatically expand the size of the Ukrainian armed forces to around one million troops. However, as the conflict has dragged on into a fourth year amid unprecedented casualties and escalating problems with desertion, this initial flow has slowed to a relative trickle. Individual units have responded by launching their own slick advertising campaigns to attract fresh recruits, while military mobilization officials have become notorious for dragging eligible men off the streets straight to military bases.

The mobilization issue has been exacerbated by President Zelenskyy’s reluctance to lower the age for compulsory military service from twenty-five to eighteen. This has led to criticism from Ukraine’s Western partners, who have argued that it is unrealistic to wage a major war while exempting so many young Ukrainians from mobilization. Rather than take the politically dangerous decision to reduce the conscription age, Zelenskyy has backed an incentive scheme to attract volunteers in the eighteen to twenty-five age bracket. However, the initiative has so far failed to fill the gaps in Ukraine’s decimated front line units.

The recent decision to lift international travel restrictions on young Ukrainian men aged eighteen to twenty-two has further complicated Ukraine’s manpower problems. Around 100,000 Ukrainian males have left the country since restrictions were eased around two months ago, Britain’s Daily Telegraph reports. This exodus deprives the country of potential future army recruits and has created a range of more immediate personnel issues that are already reverberating throughout the Ukrainian economy. While some of these men may plan on returning to Ukraine, experience since 2022 suggests that many will seek to settle elsewhere in the European Union.

Moscow is also facing difficulties replenishing its invasion force amid catastrophic losses in Ukraine that dwarf the death toll from every other Kremlin war since 1945. Putin initially sought to address this problem by launching a partial mobilization in September 2022, but the move proved hugely unpopular and led to around one million young Russians fleeing the country. Instead, the Kremlin has introduced a system a lavish financial incentives including huge enlistment bounties and generous monthly salaries in order to attract volunteers willing to join the invasion of Ukraine. While it has proved necessary to repeatedly increase the sums on offer, this approach has made it possible to secure around thirty thousand new recruits per month.

Based on the current trajectory of the war, Russia’s manpower advantage over Ukraine will only grow wider over time. This is already making itself felt along the approximately one thousand kilometers of the front, with Russian forces exploiting gaps in Ukraine’s defenses and edging forward at multiple points. While Putin’s troops have so far been unable to achieve any major breakthroughs, Russia’s territorial gains are slowly but surely adding up.

The most intensive fighting is currently taking place in the Donetsk region as Russia seeks to complete the capture of Pokrovsk. If Putin’s commanders succeed in taking the city, it will be seen by many as vindication of the Kremlin strategy to grind out victory by relying on the sheer size of the Russian army. Putin has long believed that he can win the war by outlasting the West and overwhelming Ukraine. He will see Kyiv’s increasingly chronic shortage of soldiers as the strongest indication yet that time is on his side.

For Zelenskyy, there are no easy options. Lowering the mobilization age would generate a new wave of recruits but could also pose a significant threat to Ukrainian national morale. Reforming the terms of military service to provide greater rotation guarantees while also adopting a more meritocratic approach to the appointment of army commanders may help restore flagging public confidence and attract more volunteers, but this would take time that Ukraine quite frankly no longer possesses.

For now, the battle-hardened but exhausted and outnumbered Ukrainian army has little choice but to remain in a defensive posture. Ukraine’s commanders must be prepared to cede ground when necessary in order to preserve precious fighting strength, while looking for opportunities to maximize enemy casualties. The goal should be to withstand the Russian onslaught until a combination of punishing front line losses, escalating long-range strikes, and deepening economic woes finally forces Putin to the negotiating table.

Peter Dickinson is editor of the Atlantic Council’s UkraineAlert service.


Perhap the war would not keep too long.
 

Perun

Active member
Messages
71
Reactions
2 71
Nation of residence
Croatia
Nation of origin
Croatia
People in Eastern Europe care about Russia, and want to see it destroyed, for all the suffering it had inflicted on us. The destruction and dissolution of Russia would be a dream come true for many of us.
Who in East Europe wants to se that Russia is destroyed?

And what suffering did it inflicted, on whom and when???
 

Perun

Active member
Messages
71
Reactions
2 71
Nation of residence
Croatia
Nation of origin
Croatia
Ever heard of the USSR,UDSSR,Soviet Union?
DDR stasi,Prag revolt,Hungarian revolt,Poland,Romania Caucescu etc?
You do not know much about history,do you?
Do some research,maybe you'll think differently.
I know a lot about history thats why I asked. Could you prove to me and others that Soviet rule was worse than other rule in this region through history
 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,289
Reactions
12 1,262
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Footage of the Russian army's widespread use of 152mm Krasnopol-M2 precision-guided projectiles in combat in the Donbas. The projectiles are used by the Russian 2S19 Msta-S self-propelled howitzer. The video shows the Russian 238th Artillery Brigade firing at Ukrainian army bunkers and positions near the town of Ivanopol in the Donbas.

 

MaciekRS

Contributor
Moderator
Poland Moderator
Messages
496
Reactions
13 1,342
Nation of residence
Poland
Nation of origin
Poland
Well, from Poland point of view Russia is THE main and only enemy. And its not about damage they did to us. Most devastating wars in history was
1. Swedish deluge in XVII th century
2. WW II when Germany attacked us (and 17 days later russia did the same)

In this war the longer Ukraine is defending the better for us as Russia is weaker and weaker. It was scary in 2022 when there was possibility that russians can win quickly, absorb Ukraine and with Ukraine help would be able to restore CCCP and attack with full force.
Now we can see that russia has no army for full scale attack on Europe. They will start a war (propably in Baltic states) but it will be rather hybrid war, shooting rockets, Shachids etc.

Ukraine is loosing territory, yes, but from Europe point of view (cruel, I know that) whats more important is what russia is losing.
Black sea fleet is pretty much dead. Finland and Sweden are in NATO (lets face it, they are MUCH more important then Spain, Portugal or even Italy), Baltic is now a NATO sea. Russia is losing money, losing people and giving Europe time to start to produce weapons.
Polands army is now in MUCH better shape then it was in 2022, and it will be better in 2030. Time is working for us.
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
823
Reactions
15 2,153
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
By your simple logic all ex soviet turkic states hate Turkey because not single one of them want union with Turkey.

...
Colleague, I don't care where you're writing from. But I don't think a Croatian could write something like that. A Serb could. Perhaps you're a Serb writing from Croatia, from the Serbian political underground:)
Perun is the supreme god of the Eastern Slavs. And the Croats are Western Slavs... You see, a misunderstanding!

Or, if you're Russian and writing from Russia, no one here sees anything wrong with that. There are two Russians here: our esteemed colleague nicknamed "Soldier" and our dear Jack from America. Incidentally, Jack is also a moderator.

I should note that I myself was initially suspected on this forum of spying for Russia. True, they later decided I was a spy, but a Chinese one:)
Later, it turned out it was a joke.
As we know, no one takes offense at jokes.

But what you wrote about the Turkic states is incorrect. Chances are you don't know much about the Turkic states.
 
Last edited:

Perun

Active member
Messages
71
Reactions
2 71
Nation of residence
Croatia
Nation of origin
Croatia
Colleague, I don't care where you're writing from. But I don't think a Croatian could write something like that. A Serb could. Perhaps you're a Serb writing from Croatia, from the Serbian political underground:)
Perun is the supreme god of the Eastern Slavs. And the Croats are Western Slavs... You see, a misunderstanding!

Or, if you're Russian and writing from Russia, no one here sees anything wrong with that. There are two Russians here: our esteemed colleague nicknamed "Soldier" and our dear Jack from America. Incidentally, Jack is also a moderator.

I should note that I myself was initially suspected on this forum of spying for Russia. True, they later decided I was a spy, but a Chinese one:)
Later, it turned out it was a joke.
As we know, no one takes offense at jokes.

But what you wrote about the Turkic states is incorrect. Chances are you don't know much about the Turkic states.
Perun is suprime god of all Slavs. Poland have MANPAD named Piorun (Perun) does that means that Poles are eastern Slavs?
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
873
Reactions
14 1,135
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
As predicted, Russian GDP growth continues to head down towards 0%

Russia’s economy has continued to lose momentum for the third consecutive quarter, according to new data from the Economic Development Ministry.

The ministry estimated that GDP grew by just 0.6% year-on-year in July-September, down from 1.1% in the second quarter, 1.4% in the first and 4.5% in the final quarter of 2024.

Overall, Russia’s economy expanded by 1% in the first nine months of 2025, four times slower than the 4.3% growth recorded a year earlier.

Industrial growth rose just 0.5% compared to 5.6% in 2024, while most civilian sectors are now in decline.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom