persian clown. whoever the americans have put into power in iran have always led that nation into failure. Last time Iran was great, was when the Turks ruled it.
Still,where did the ''missile'' originate from?If you check below map, you will see that where the remnants of the interceptor fell, Dortyol is 20-25km north of Iskenderun. That is too far north of Cyprus. It probably was going for the old US Incirlik-Adana airforce base. It is now a Turkish base for use of NATO too.
Also that line goes all the way to Konya (top left of the map) , where NATO AWACS planes have been stationed and operating by the Iranian border during this conflict.
View attachment 79488
Where it originated from is an unknown. Most Likely there is a record of it in Kurecik. But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.Still,where did the ''missile'' originate from?
My guess,American or Israeli false flag operation.
www.savunmasanayist.com
thedefensepost.com
I noticed that UK say there is explosion in cyprus base, before they allow US to use it, but there is zero evidence of Iran attack.Where it originated from is an unknown. Most Likely there is a record of it in Kurecik. But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.
US or Israel could have easily fired an interceptor and let it self detonate over Turkish airspace. Infact non-presence of the destroyed missile‘s remnants can be a give away of a false flag. However Turkish airborne and early warning radars should also have risen the alarms.
Nervous? Because of what?And USAF annouced a test of Minuteman III ICBM in 3rd March.
I think they might be a bit nervous.
![]()
US Schedules Overnight Minuteman III Nuclear Missile Test at Vandenberg
The US Air Force has announced a new operational test of the LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile in March.thedefensepost.com
Hegses said it might be because Iran was trying to "kill" Donald Trump.Nervous? Because of what?
A Turkish official, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, said the missile had been "aimed at a base in Greek Cyprus but veered off course".
They cant,all speculation.Where it originated from is an unknown. Most Likely there is a record of it in Kurecik. But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.
US or Israel could have easily fired an interceptor and let it self detonate over Turkish airspace. Infact non-presence of the destroyed missile‘s remnants can be a give away of a false flag.
However Turkish airborne and early warning radars should also have risen the alarms.
EDIT
According to this news of @savunmasanayist , the missile was intercepted as it passed in to Syrian air space from Iraq and it’s parts fell in to the Syrian city of Kamisli, which is over 500km away from Dortyol, where the interceptor part was found. How can they explain this?![]()
Türkiye'ye Yönelen Balistik Füze Neyle Vuruldu? | SavunmaSanayiST
Türk hava sahasına yönelen İran füzesi NATO unsurlarınca vuruldu. Hatay'a düşen SM-3 parçaları operasyonun detaylarını ortaya koydu.www.savunmasanayist.com
Doesn't really matter the class. Target was barely a corvette, more than likely they had no idea they were being watched and more than likely they were completely clueless until the last moment. Sad really. If Iran wasn't such a pariah, a barely combatant vessel being struck in a busy shipping lane when two states are not in an actual state of war would be a huge discussion.BREAKING: 101 missing and 78 wounded following a submarine attack on an Iranian ship near Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan officials tell Reuters
Perhaps Virginia class
You don't use an SM-3 to shoot down a cruise missile or a drone.It's unknown what type of missile it was—ballistic or cruise. The launch location is also crucial. It's possible it wasn't even an Iranian missile.
It's even possible it was a Shahid drone, and the journalists wrote "missile." After all, they're not experts; they could have been mistaken.
It need to have been launched from Iran.My guess,American or Israeli false flag operation.
Yes it does? We have direct access to NATO missile defence system which the AN/TPY-2 is part of; it's headquartered in Germany and same system was used during the Black Sea drones incident last year.But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.
It crashed to Syria.Infact non-presence of the destroyed missile‘s remnants
If it was an exoatmospheric interception as it's touted, it makes tons of sense that interceptor and target debris could fall into very different locations.How can they explain this?
How does a ballistic missile following a ballistic trajectory veer off course? Only thing I can think of is the interception itself.A Turkish official, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, said the missile had been "aimed at a base in Greek Cyprus but veered off course".
We need a strong China more than ever to keep that bully USA in check.Hegseth is completely destroying the US army.
Im pretty sure US did use sm3 to kill drones before, they dont like to take risk trying to reduce risk with sm2Doesn't really matter the class. Target was barely a corvette, more than likely they had no idea they were being watched and more than likely they were completely clueless until the last moment. Sad really. If Iran wasn't such a pariah, a barely combatant vessel being struck in a busy shipping lane when two states are not in an actual state of war would be a huge discussion.
You don't use an SM-3 to shoot down a cruise missile or a drone.
It need to have been launched from Iran.
Yes it does? We have direct access to NATO missile defence system which the AN/TPY-2 is part of; it's headquartered in Germany and same system was used during the Black Sea drones incident last year.
It crashed to Syria.
If it was an exoatmospheric interception as it's touted, it makes tons of sense that interceptor and target debris could fall into very different locations.
How does a ballistic missile following a ballistic trajectory veer off course? Only thing I can think of is the interception itself.
China is disinterested in keeping anyone in check outside of their neighbourhood.We need a strong China more than ever to keep that bully USA in check.
Doubt it, link me.Im pretty sure US did use sm3 to kill drones before, they dont like to take risk trying to reduce risk with sm2
On paper to a certain degree. It is under the operational control of Turkish armed forces.Yes it does? We have direct access to NATO missile defence system which the AN/TPY-2 is part of; it's headquartered in Germany and same system was used during the Black Sea drones incident last year.
I am afraid none can prevent US from going mad.We need a strong China more than ever to keep that bully USA in check.
Isnt it time we changed this situation?On paper to a certain degree. It is under the operational control of Turkish armed forces.
View attachment 79489
The Kürecik Radar Station in Malatya, Turkey, is a critical NATO early-warning asset, operational since 2012, designed to detect ballistic missile threats. While operated by U.S. personnel, it is situated on a Turkish military base with security provided by the Turkish Armed Forces. Turkey retains control over data access, mandating that information is shared only with NATO allies.
The AN/TPY-2 radar systems at the site are operated by U.S. military personnel. None other than US personnel are allowed to operate the radar systems.
The site is operated as a NATO asset, primarily manned by U.S. personnel. While Turkey is responsible for the external security and perimeter protection, the internal operation room, which manages highly sensitive data, is generally restricted to U.S.
So how do we know if the critical information is not passed over to the Israelis? We depend on US personnel to pass on information they pass on. The information they may see fit.