• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,260
Reactions
37 11,315
Nation of residence
United Kingdom

If the moment approach's where either the disgraceful kurds make a move backed by the zionist demon, or the iranian state looks like it will collapse, Turkiye and Azerbaijan should move in to protect the Turkic people. Once protected, we can see where things will move going forward.

If Turkiye should make a move and the zionist dominated west, start making moves to propagandise against the Turks, then the iranian regime should be supported. Since by propergandising against Turkiye for protecting the Turkic peoples, its 100% an open declaration of war.
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
565
Reactions
18 998
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China

U.S. Navy Submarine Torpedoes Iranian Frigate In Indian Ocean​

U.S. Navy attack submarine has sunk an Iranian warship in the Indian Ocean, the Pentagon has confirmed. Authorities in Sri Lanka had earlier announced they had rescued Iranian sailors from the Moudge class frigate IRIS Dena after what they said appeared to be a submarine attack. This is the first known attack by an American submarine on a surface warship since World War II and the first such action anywhere since the Churchill class HMS Conqueror sank the Argentine Navy cruiser ARA General Belgrano during the Falklands War in 1982.


By the way, the comments of this news show the real feeling of US people, when they know a U.S.Navy nuclear submarine kill a Iran warship in the international waters.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,305
Reactions
274 22,501
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Still,where did the ''missile'' originate from?
My guess,American or Israeli false flag operation.
Where it originated from is an unknown. Most Likely there is a record of it in Kurecik. But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.

US or Israel could have easily fired an interceptor and let it self detonate over Turkish airspace. Infact non-presence of the destroyed missile‘s remnants can be a give away of a false flag.
However Turkish airborne and early warning radars should also have risen the alarms.


EDIT

According to this news of @savunmasanayist , the missile was intercepted as it passed in to Syrian air space from Iraq and it’s parts fell in to the Syrian city of Kamisli, which is over 500km away from Dortyol, where the interceptor part was found. How can they explain this?
 
Last edited:

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
565
Reactions
18 998
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Where it originated from is an unknown. Most Likely there is a record of it in Kurecik. But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.

US or Israel could have easily fired an interceptor and let it self detonate over Turkish airspace. Infact non-presence of the destroyed missile‘s remnants can be a give away of a false flag. However Turkish airborne and early warning radars should also have risen the alarms.
I noticed that UK say there is explosion in cyprus base, before they allow US to use it, but there is zero evidence of Iran attack.
They even have no intereted to give a photo for confirm. Perhaps the situation is extremely urgent(for US).
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
5,400
Reactions
19 5,435
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
565
Reactions
18 998
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Last edited by a moderator:

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
565
Reactions
18 998
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
A Turkish official, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, said the missile had been "aimed at a base in Greek Cyprus but veered off course".

 
T

TR_123456

Guest
Where it originated from is an unknown. Most Likely there is a record of it in Kurecik. But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.

US or Israel could have easily fired an interceptor and let it self detonate over Turkish airspace. Infact non-presence of the destroyed missile‘s remnants can be a give away of a false flag.
However Turkish airborne and early warning radars should also have risen the alarms.


EDIT

According to this news of @savunmasanayist , the missile was intercepted as it passed in to Syrian air space from Iraq and it’s parts fell in to the Syrian city of Kamisli, which is over 500km away from Dortyol, where the interceptor part was found. How can they explain this?
They cant,all speculation.
They want to steer us into a direction.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,236
Reactions
127 19,187
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
BREAKING: 101 missing and 78 wounded following a submarine attack on an Iranian ship near Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan officials tell Reuters


Perhaps Virginia class
Doesn't really matter the class. Target was barely a corvette, more than likely they had no idea they were being watched and more than likely they were completely clueless until the last moment. Sad really. If Iran wasn't such a pariah, a barely combatant vessel being struck in a busy shipping lane when two states are not in an actual state of war would be a huge discussion.
It's unknown what type of missile it was—ballistic or cruise. The launch location is also crucial. It's possible it wasn't even an Iranian missile.
It's even possible it was a Shahid drone, and the journalists wrote "missile." After all, they're not experts; they could have been mistaken.
You don't use an SM-3 to shoot down a cruise missile or a drone.
My guess,American or Israeli false flag operation.
It need to have been launched from Iran.
But Turkey doesn’t have access to this so called NATO radar, even though it provides security for it.
Yes it does? We have direct access to NATO missile defence system which the AN/TPY-2 is part of; it's headquartered in Germany and same system was used during the Black Sea drones incident last year.
Infact non-presence of the destroyed missile‘s remnants
It crashed to Syria.
How can they explain this?
If it was an exoatmospheric interception as it's touted, it makes tons of sense that interceptor and target debris could fall into very different locations.
A Turkish official, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, said the missile had been "aimed at a base in Greek Cyprus but veered off course".
How does a ballistic missile following a ballistic trajectory veer off course? Only thing I can think of is the interception itself.
 
Last edited:

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,226
Reactions
15 1,990
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Doesn't really matter the class. Target was barely a corvette, more than likely they had no idea they were being watched and more than likely they were completely clueless until the last moment. Sad really. If Iran wasn't such a pariah, a barely combatant vessel being struck in a busy shipping lane when two states are not in an actual state of war would be a huge discussion.

You don't use an SM-3 to shoot down a cruise missile or a drone.

It need to have been launched from Iran.

Yes it does? We have direct access to NATO missile defence system which the AN/TPY-2 is part of; it's headquartered in Germany and same system was used during the Black Sea drones incident last year.

It crashed to Syria.

If it was an exoatmospheric interception as it's touted, it makes tons of sense that interceptor and target debris could fall into very different locations.

How does a ballistic missile following a ballistic trajectory veer off course? Only thing I can think of is the interception itself.
Im pretty sure US did use sm3 to kill drones before, they dont like to take risk trying to reduce risk with sm2
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,236
Reactions
127 19,187
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We need a strong China more than ever to keep that bully USA in check.
China is disinterested in keeping anyone in check outside of their neighbourhood.

Im pretty sure US did use sm3 to kill drones before, they dont like to take risk trying to reduce risk with sm2
Doubt it, link me.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,305
Reactions
274 22,501
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes it does? We have direct access to NATO missile defence system which the AN/TPY-2 is part of; it's headquartered in Germany and same system was used during the Black Sea drones incident last year.
On paper to a certain degree. It is under the operational control of Turkish armed forces.


Türkiye on high alert during Iran's missile attack on Israel ...

The Kürecik Radar Station in Malatya, Turkey, is a critical NATO early-warning asset, operational since 2012, designed to detect ballistic missile threats. While operated by U.S. personnel, it is situated on a Turkish military base with security provided by the Turkish Armed Forces. Turkey retains control over data access, mandating that information is shared only with NATO allies.

The AN/TPY-2 radar systems at the site are operated by U.S. military personnel. None other than US personnel are allowed to operate the radar systems.
The site is operated as a NATO asset, primarily manned by U.S. personnel. While Turkey is responsible for the external security and perimeter protection, the internal operation room, which manages highly sensitive data, is generally restricted to U.S.

So how do we know if the critical information is not passed over to the Israelis? We depend on US personnel to pass on information to us. The information they may see fit.
 
Last edited:

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
565
Reactions
18 998
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
We need a strong China more than ever to keep that bully USA in check.
I am afraid none can prevent US from going mad.
You used the word "in check" which mean two people is playing chess, but now US is the one refuse to loss and shot the opposite with gun.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
On paper to a certain degree. It is under the operational control of Turkish armed forces.


View attachment 79489
The Kürecik Radar Station in Malatya, Turkey, is a critical NATO early-warning asset, operational since 2012, designed to detect ballistic missile threats. While operated by U.S. personnel, it is situated on a Turkish military base with security provided by the Turkish Armed Forces. Turkey retains control over data access, mandating that information is shared only with NATO allies.

The AN/TPY-2 radar systems at the site are operated by U.S. military personnel. None other than US personnel are allowed to operate the radar systems.
The site is operated as a NATO asset, primarily manned by U.S. personnel. While Turkey is responsible for the external security and perimeter protection, the internal operation room, which manages highly sensitive data, is generally restricted to U.S.

So how do we know if the critical information is not passed over to the Israelis? We depend on US personnel to pass on information they pass on. The information they may see fit.
Isnt it time we changed this situation?
A NATO country but cant access the the internal operation room on its own soil,you think the Germans/Italians and others have the same restrictions?
I dont think so.
 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,896
Reactions
15 1,656
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
An American submarine, presumably a Virginia-class submarine, sank the Iranian frigate Dena, a Mowj-class submarine, in the Indian Ocean as it returned from a naval parade in India. The frigate, reportedly a destroyer, belongs to the Iranian Navy. The 1,500-ton Dena, launched in 2015, is technical information available on the screen and in the video description. The Iranian frigate Dena was sunk by a presumably American 533-mm Mk48 ADCAP torpedo fired from a Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine off the coast of Sri Lanka.

Mowj-class frigate Dena

Displacement: 1,300 to 1,500 tons.
Length: 95 meters.
Width: 11.1 meters.
Draft: 3.25 meters.
Propulsion: Two 10,000 hp (7,500 kW) engines and four 740 hp (550 kW) diesel generators.
Speed: 30 knots.
Crew: Up to 180.
Armament:

76 mm DP rapid-fire automatic cannon;
40 mm Fath anti-aircraft cannon (a Bofors copy);
4 C-802 / Noor anti-ship missiles;
2 20 mm Oerlikon cannons;
2 triple 324 mm light torpedoes;
4 Sayad-2 SAM systems.

Aviation equipment: Bell 212 anti-submarine helicopter.
Radar: Asr, covers 360 degrees within a 300 km radius.

 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,236
Reactions
127 19,187
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
On paper to a certain degree. It is under the operational control of Turkish armed forces.


View attachment 79489
The Kürecik Radar Station in Malatya, Turkey, is a critical NATO early-warning asset, operational since 2012, designed to detect ballistic missile threats. While operated by U.S. personnel, it is situated on a Turkish military base with security provided by the Turkish Armed Forces. Turkey retains control over data access, mandating that information is shared only with NATO allies.

The AN/TPY-2 radar systems at the site are operated by U.S. military personnel. None other than US personnel are allowed to operate the radar systems.
The site is operated as a NATO asset, primarily manned by U.S. personnel. While Turkey is responsible for the external security and perimeter protection, the internal operation room, which manages highly sensitive data, is generally restricted to U.S.

So how do we know if the critical information is not passed over to the Israelis? We depend on US personnel to pass on information they pass on. The information they may see fit.
No. All air defence systems and early warning radars in Turkey(except the nonoperational S400 battery in Mürted) operate under the BHHM/CAOC Torrejon which answers to Ramstein at the moment. There's a subunit in Eskişehir at 1st AJÜ and all information goes through there, allowing Turkey full access. Entirety of Turkey's air defense picture along with batteries and the squadrons tasked with defending the airspace is under NATO. In a world where a BM takes at most 10 minutes from launch to impact, there's simply no time to discuss plans of action or ask for permission from respective governments. NATO(in this case the Joint NATO Air Defence Command based in Torrejon of which Turkish servicemen is also a part of per rotation) just defends directly as it sees fit by monitoring and tasking the most fit and closest units. This could be an American Burke, the Spanish Patriot in İncirlik, or the future Siper B3 in Diyarbakır. It's the same Torrejon CAOC that tasks Turkish F-16s to intercept drones coming from Black Sea, or tasking Turkish F-16s deployed to Romania to intercept drones coming from the east. All the E-3 flights that take off from Konya for months and watch south or east are also tasked under the same CAOC.

NATO of course gives information to Israel, it's an ally of NATO. But TPY-2 in Kürecik hardly helps Israel, that's another matter. Radar was placed there to keep track of Russian and Iranian BMs launched at European NATO. Regardless same air picture is used by the American destroyers off the coast of Israel intercepting BMs right this second, same as the American destroyer that intercepted the BM over Turkey today. This is NATO working as intended, giving Americans full view of things while also helping our own defense. Rest is politics.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom