TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Quasar 

Contributor
Moderator
Messages
895
Reactions
54 3,904
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
I have still problems with the design of Kizilelma. It doesn’t look “LO enough “ , less matured. Try to compare it with Ghost Bat.
As common knowledge canard may considered as an effecting factor in LO ... surface finishing is important as well (concerning surface finishing so far we have seen prototypes and ''production prototypes'' (KIZILELMA PT-series ) not wise to expect Boeing or TAI (once assigned to manufacture center fuselages of F 35 and now KAAN) manufacruring standards from Baykar overnight.

all aspect stealth and low RSC from all directions should be an expensive masterpiece... may not worth it for an unmanned platform.

Further, our requirements and our reality or the role we envisioned for KIZILELM may defintly be different from requirements which created Ghost Bat or other projects.

we can assume that path of lower RCS from certain direction(s) has been followed and/or prioritized for KIZILELMA

AND eventhough we have never heard a single word about it, Luneburg lenses on KIZILELMA is definitly a good sign :devilish:
 
Last edited:

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,765
Reactions
19 4,891
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why? What makes Ghost Bat more stealth?
First, Ghost Bat looks from one piece. Second, the Air intake and fuselage looks seamless. Third, all the visible screws and rivets on Kizilelma. Fourth, the Radome is more flush mounted and less straight like be Kizilelma. And some more points I could count if you want?..
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,943
Solutions
1
Reactions
36 5,724
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
First, Ghost Bat looks from one piece. Second, the Air intake and fuselage looks seamless. Third, all the visible screws and rivets on Kizilelma. Fourth, the Radome is more flush mounted and less straight like be Kizilelma. And some more points I could count if you want?..
Your first 2 points are about the paint, not the drone lol and 4th is just a bent nose, how does that effect its RCS?
 

Quasar 

Contributor
Moderator
Messages
895
Reactions
54 3,904
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
About a ton of munitions there. 4 Mk-82s and a Mam-T to top it off.
1766781876299.png
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,765
Reactions
19 4,891
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Your first 2 points are about the paint, not the drone lol and 4th is just a bent nose, how does that affect its RCS?
You think the reason why Ghost Bat loooks from one piece and without screws and rievets is just the paint?

About the bent nose, does it effect the RCS?
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,888
Reactions
14 9,695
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
Interesting how PT4 has not been seen for a very long time. PT5 and PT3 have been doing flights regularly.

Also, did PT5 get its stealth coating - seems more polished than before.
 

Strong AI

Experienced member
Messages
2,448
Reactions
53 8,337
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
We still did not see the IWB in action, not bombs but it should fire cruisemissiles.
Actually i think ANKA 3 is more suited for that role. Which doesn't mean KE shouldn't be able to do it too. But imo KE should concentrate more on launching BVR missiles from IWB. Afaik there is an official illustration of KE launching SOM-J from IWB.

Found it (from Roketsan)

1766920758827.jpeg
 
Top Bottom