• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,265
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,641
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
First, Ghost Bat looks from one piece. Second, the Air intake and fuselage looks seamless. Third, all the visible screws and rivets on Kizilelma. Fourth, the Radome is more flush mounted and less straight like be Kizilelma. And some more points I could count if you want?..
Your first 2 points are about the paint, not the drone lol and 4th is just a bent nose, how does that effect its RCS?
 

Quasar 

Contributor
Moderator
Messages
920
Reactions
54 4,037
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
About a ton of munitions there. 4 Mk-82s and a Mam-T to top it off.
1766781876299.png
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
5,379
Reactions
19 5,410
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Your first 2 points are about the paint, not the drone lol and 4th is just a bent nose, how does that affect its RCS?
You think the reason why Ghost Bat loooks from one piece and without screws and rievets is just the paint?

About the bent nose, does it effect the RCS?
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,909
Reactions
14 9,764
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
Interesting how PT4 has not been seen for a very long time. PT5 and PT3 have been doing flights regularly.

Also, did PT5 get its stealth coating - seems more polished than before.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,270
Reactions
258 22,300
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
We still did not see the IWB in action, not bombs but it should fire cruisemissiles.
It is the most vital capability of this aircraft.
Since it is a Low Observable plane by nature, it has to make use of this trait. Carrying a couple of SOM-J missiles for stand off attack for heavier ships and up to 4 x CAKIR MrRAShM for lower weight naval targets should be within it’s munition carrying envelope.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
1,163
Reactions
11 2,107
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
It is the most vital capability of this aircraft.
Since it is a Low Observable plane by nature, it has to make use of this trait. Carrying a couple of SOM-J missiles for stand off attack for heavier ships and up to 4 x CAKIR MrRAShM for lower weight naval targets should be within it’s munition carrying envelope.
4 Cakir wouldn’t fit maybe 3 side by side
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,270
Reactions
258 22,300
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
4 Cakir wouldn’t fit maybe 3 side by side
4 x CAKIR may be not if side by side placement is the only way.
But SOM-J has a stowed width of 480mm.
CAKIR has a diameter of 275mm .
4 x 275 = 1100 mm
2 x 480 = 960 mm.
If they can find 15-20cm more width inside the IWB then it is possible (after all as we have full authority over the plane, it is up to Baykar engineers to see if they can find the space) .
But otherwise 3 x CAKIR is achievable as you pointed out.

1766923316654.png

1766923527624.jpeg

There is a lot of space there under its belly. I hope they have made it available to be used by the IWB s. When it has a 10000lbf engine it should have more MTOW capability too. Also wing area of KE is substantial, and should give it good amount of lift.

PS. Additionally, you don’t have to place missiles side by side. If space is available you may stack them on top of each other.
Also not to forget “sidekick” mechanism of f35-A and C versions.

1766925750654.jpeg
 
Last edited:

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,894
Solutions
1
Reactions
51 17,040
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Interesting how PT4 has not been seen for a very long time. PT5 and PT3 have been doing flights regularly.

Also, did PT5 get its stealth coating - seems more polished than before.
PT-5 has some stealth treatment, but it is still not the final product. You can see the serrated lines if you look upclose.

vyxFICZ-qVJer3lt.jpg
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
1,163
Reactions
11 2,107
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
4 x CAKIR may be not if side by side placement is the only way.
But SOM-J has a stowed width of 480mm.
CAKIR has a diameter of 275mm .
4 x 275 = 1100 mm
2 x 480 = 960 mm.
If they can find 15-20cm more width inside the IWB then it is possible (after all as we have full authority over the plane, it is up to Baykar engineers to see if they can find the space) .
But otherwise 3 x CAKIR is achievable as you pointed out.

View attachment 78817
View attachment 78818
There is a lot of space there under its belly. I hope they have made it available to be used by the IWB s. When it has a 10000lbf engine it should have more MTOW capability too. Also wing area of KE is substantial, and should give it good amount of lift.

PS. Additionally, you don’t have to place missiles side by side. If space is available you may stack them on top of each other.
Also not to forget “sidekick” mechanism of f35-A and C versions.

View attachment 78819
i think that last picture is edited if you look closely the missiles have all the same shadow
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,270
Reactions
258 22,300
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Last edited:

Ahlatshah

Committed member
Messages
162
Reactions
19 726
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
- Within the scope of the Bayraktar KIZILELMA Unmanned Fighter Aircraft Project; our KIZILELMA Unmanned Fighter Aircraft communicated with each other via the Azra National Data Link (MDL) and executed patrol duties in a fully autonomous manner under swarm UAV command.

-During this mission, a close autonomous formation flight between unmanned fighter aircraft was successfully achieved for the first time in the world with two KIZILELMA approaching within approximately 15 meters of each other.


I wonder if this system could be applied to our F16s, at least Özgürs. I mean KE with sensors and AZRA datalink, can interact with flying F16s or not? If it is so, that is you know...The real footsteps of MUM-T
 
Top Bottom