Search results

F517 TCG İzmit (I class frigate) it seems like there is good progress so far.

That is the biggest bullshit I have ever heard. Fatih district alone should have something like a million foreigners.

It doesn't work that way. If armed forces act as a unified structure no one is dumb enough to fight against it and there will be a successful coup but most of the time armed forces also fracture into two or more cliques. In that case, armed militia/people can change the tide of the conflict.

Yeah somewhat. He is a journalist. He must have heard the news from the Turkish side. I guess Turkiye can provide 4x Hisar class OPV+4x I class frigates for somewhere around 2.5 billion euros depending on the package. The price tag should be around 150 million for Hisar class OPVs and 400...

Big if true. The Navy of Bangladesh will be a force to be reckoned with if those projects become a reality.

He is a qualified guy there is no doubt about that. He is nothing like the zoo manager who was appointed to some division of Tubitak in the past but there are two things to take notice. 1) He was "vice director" of the helicopter division of TUSAS so he is promoted ahead of people that outrank...

It is not that easy again if you increase pulsewidth it will take a longer time to create and send pulses, it is a delicate balance. Aselsan uses foreign-sourced oscillators. Aselsan has been working on doped sapphire and quartz crystals inside its advanced materials research center (the same...

You guys are chasing the wrong ghosts. Rensselaer Polytechnic lobby removed Temel Kotil. New SSB head has been appointing Rensselaer graduates left and right since he took office. https://www.linkedin.com/in/prof-dr-haluk-gorgun-98670818/?originalSubdomain=tr...

So you are saying Russian radar has equal PRF to Western radars? I would love to see the Russian oscillator that enables above 100 kHz PRF. IMHO even the 100 kHz assumption is overestimation for the Russian hardware. For comparison Korean AESA radar will have 150 kHz max PRF. By the way higher...

It is a wonderful simulator and a state-of-the-art training facility. I have seen it up close.

If all else fails for Israel. The US will intervene, and you can be sure of that.

I don't care about the orange and yellow ranges given. The infographic clearly states assumptions about the radar and ranges should be calculated from those not the other way around. It is not right to achieve a result from another result if the first result is not true. Those assumptions are as...

If the war expands into Lebanon you have a point but expect complete destruction of Gaza(I don't think there will be any buildings left), a death toll of several hundred thousand people and resettling in Gaza will be impossible.

I'm not sharing a chart. I'm sharing an Excel file. You should download it and fill out the Excel spreadsheet with the above assumptions to get a solution. You don't know what you are talking about. I highlighted the areas you should look for and fill. I don't know how i can help you anymore...

You are wrong Here I found it. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wjSiyYFGj6uuSKxwVO77teASMV7fwnyc/view?pli=1

Google AESA radar range calculator. The latest version should be V3. It is an Excel spreadsheet.

Your calculation is wrong. This is a very rough way to calculate. I use the AESA Radar Calculator for my calculations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341764957_AESA_Radar_Calculator_ver2

Meanwhile, with delay after delay, we made it to June 2024 without commissioning the first submarine.

Assumptions for X-band nose radar. 3 sqm RCS target 1552x 10 Watt modules (358x modules for cheek array) %50 search capacity 0.03 dwell time 10 GHz frequency If you do the match with those assumptions for a 1 sqm RCS target you end up with R90%(probability of detection greater than %90) value...

Next-Generation Engine mockup/concept for the SCAF/FCAS there is no egzotic nozzle.