Search results

I should probably make a DERMAN with trailer hehe. First with CENK and later with Land MİDLAS

You kinda said it yourself, not an MRBM but 2 MRBMs. This configuration doesn't look like 1 CENK per launcher but 2. Anyone familiar with engineering matters knows that loading things near their limit constantly isn't a good idea in the long run. I guess 50 ton vehicle will probably carry 2...

50 ton is near the weight of ICBM itself, not counting launcher components. CENK is more possible as the missile seems to be near completion or already completed

Yeah, Murat İkinci said it himself. I guess it is intended for CENK MRBM launcher in a trailer configuration

But again, what is TB2 V2 about?

It is better for such missiles with complex optic seekers to be a little slower (Which is the case anyway due to increased drag) so that targets can be picked out much better in MITL or autonomous mode

ANKA-4 concept art done, comes with a scaled down BÜRFİS, TOYGUN and KARAT

ANKA-4 or ANKA-5, I have no idea at this point. The render is a sample and ain't gonna be the final version. Just wanted to goof around with render settings tonight

Yeah, if we take 300 TB2s and at least 15 AKINCIs. Average TB2 airtime: 2000+ hours Average AKINCI airtime: 2000 hours

AURA and SERHAT-DUAL will be important assets for our C-RAM/UAS defense as they provide dual capabilities. AURA will be a next step as the AESA radar among the two while SERHAT-DUAL was an easier one to achieve.

We should have our own naming system at some point. I have something like this in mind based on first development goals: XY = Non-Cruise ground attack missiles, X depends on launch platform (K, D, H) XS = Cruise Missiles, X depends on launch platform HSF = Air Defense HH = Air-to-Air BF =...

So we once talked about double packing, Polamd and MBDA have introduced the CAMM-MR with 100 km range goal and double pack for MK41 due to increased diameter

Yeah, Roketsan. I just would like to see them explore further mini missile concepts for infantry level fire support and even C-UAS (See SADM missile)

I doubt they will change the layout from triple to a mega long one. But since SM6 without a booster has been tested on Super Hornet as an interim solution for next gen LRAAM, why not for F-16? But again, we have GÖKHAN project going for that role, and a liquid fuel ramjet should certainly...

And going higher means we might start seeing thruster based controls for future SİPER missiles. Anti Ballistic capability focused missiles have it because of air getting thinner and fins losing their ability to manuever the missile.

Does it mean 12x TOLUN capacity? yeet

Akbaba is a solid fuel ramjet missile and ROKETSAN is handling it. Gökhan should start its tests this year if I remember correctly

TÜBİTAK SAGE General Manager Gürcan Okumuş: "SİPER Blok 2's range can be multiplied by 1.5 to 2 times with a booster" So our dreams of a SİPER Block 2ER are likely to come true So, this thing will probably be nearly 8 m in length. Mk41 Strike Length measures at nearly 8 m and SM-6 fills nearly...

If they modify GÖKDOĞAN's rear fins like with AIM-120D, they probably can. I'll take a chance and measure. Would be glad if someone gave the width per bay

SİPER B1 also has GPS supported guidance, aside from a booster as a difference from HİSAR RF. GPS likely supports midcourse navigation much like AIM-120D