Search results

465 in seems like a typo while 46,5 in is 118 cm which is a legit value for such an engine.

Ship engines only use the core of the engine they are derived from.

That power level speaks better to derivative engines towards ship engines, power generation engines and high bypass turbofan engines. That core engine can be used to make such engines. So there can be multiple uses for such an engine where a smaller engine falls short.

Looks like MSB Arge have been indoctrinated by grand master Eray Güçlüer.

$100m is a cost when made in the west, we can make it for like $30m I think. The power lies in its fast speed. If you can reach your target with this roket while you do not have any other viable option then it is worth the money. EDIT: India makes it for $5 million, so I would say we can make...

If Yıldırımhan can carry 7 Gazap bomb warheads it can do some carpet bombing and it will be done in hypersonic speeds.

In a TV interview today Mesut Hakkı Caşın said that Mr Mahmut Akşit said that there is a 50k lbf engine in the works, if you want to believe that.

MSB Arge appeared out of nowhere and are displaying ambitious projects but what credibility do they have. Are they even commisioned to make those things, very unusual and dubious.

Aegean and the east Mediterranean are a close neighborhood we can access from our mainland.

Hürjet is a learning project for TAI and they wouldn't make a bigger plane for learning. Also there is a market in the world for such a plane while a twin engine trainer size plane can be a total failure because lack of demand. The name Hürjet maybe confusing but I meant Hürjet-2 as a plane...

You can make your Hürjet optionally manned. If the mission is more like bombing certain targets your unmanned Hürjet can do that very well but if the mission requires decision making or management of drones in a fleet then you can fly manned. In any case you have the engine to make the plane...

Turkish Airforce want what Turkish industry makes.

The engine is in the making, you can make it as you wish. You can make 2 versions of it, it won't take too long. Their difference will probably only mean a 5% extra work.

Making the engine world class and making it usable are two different things. You can only sell world class engines to foreign users but you can use a usable engine yourself.

Because it is really not easy to do that; it is only an intention and nothing is guarantied therefore it was only mentioned once or twice and was not dwelled on.

There isn't an official date as it is a development project but we can work around dates that can be derived from some given dates. If the delivery to Indonesia is for 2032 it makes sense to think delivery to the TurAF would be around 2030 and a couple dozen be delivered before Indonesia order...

Curious if the engine will first run as an afterburner engine or a version of it that will run without an afterburner will precede the afterburner engine. With the smaller TF6000 series the TF10000 engine only emerged after the TF6000 engine was made. It made sense as the slower engine would be...

TB3 engine still has potential to go to higher power levels if you accept a shorter lifetime, so going from 196hp to 216 adding another 20hp may make what it may fall short of achieving today achievable in the future. Loading less fuel when the mission allows has the same effect.

There must be some unsung hero engines powering the smaller drones coming out recently, I hope we see some of them at the SAHA Expo in the coming weeks.

You can determine a market value by comparison but it is not readily available in listings showing market valuation. It is only relevant when people can buy company stock. Otherwise there are other companies than TAI to take into consideration, there are like a dozen multi billion dollar defence...