Search results

As if the constitution has never been changed before for personal political gains. https://www.politico.eu/article/sitki-ayan-recep-tayyip-erdogan-terrorism-hezbollah-iran-turkey-lebanon/ An article about the recent sanctions on Erdogan school buddy and how he helps Iran to funnel billions...

Its not. If you spent five minutes reading, you'd know that. The Turkish government requested those F16s. You can read the proposal yourself instead of speculating.

"1 person has said something so the entire diverse group of people he is one little part of is bad." "One F35 had a minor accident so all F35 are shit" All of these arguments are weak and pathetic. Thats my opinion as a private person, not a mod. Instead of generalizing, the real eyebrow...

Foreign ambassador says something that the country he's working in will appreciate. Hold the presses /s In other words he did his job, were you expecting him to say no we will never buy anything or be a diplomat and be diplomatic about the answer? Hardly even news. Anyway, topic is about...

I'll post this here, since I don't want this discussion to derail the T-FX thread. As I said, It is better two have one bird in the hand than two in the bush. It's better to be prepared than to hope that TF-X will be all smooth sailing and go into production as the announced plans. Rarely ever...

My MSCI Turkey ETF is down, even with the Turkish stock market rising.

There's an English saying: one bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. F16 are combat proven, TF-X is still in development. It's better to have the F16 and not need them, instead of needing them urgently because of unexpected delays in the development of TF-X and then beeing in even deeper...

There are almost 10 years to bridge till our squadrons of TF-X and Hürjets fly.

Täter ist aus Eritrea

Is this on top of the known exports or new orders that were previously unknown?

Makes me wonder how feasible a Caspian Sea Bridge would be.

Did they really place the 1200 Dollar one by one on the table like its a big sum.

I believe it when I see it. They will probably rebrand it, get things calm before going back to their old habits.

The same discussion with every other product. How are the companies supposed to become sustainable and no longer tax funded if they are not allowed to export? Exports = income = money to spend on new R&D and products. I think our bureaucracy knows better what can be sold to who and what not.

And in talks with 15 other countries, kudos to the team behind it!

We need to bring back state enterprises or private / government enterprises to other areas. If we can do it in defense and the last years have shown we can. Then we should also be able to leverage this for other areas where we are lacking. Whether its semiconductors or others. Just take a look...

Stick to the topic, the salty comment of someone below an article is hardly worth a post.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the requirements changed once the F35 debacle happened.

We dont have to turn every thread into: I wonder what the Greeks are saying. It does add nothing to the discussion, further posts that derail the thread and add no substance will be deleted.

We're kinda in the same boat with TF-X, initially planned as an air superiority fighter and later the plans were changed. One more reason to be less ha-ha and more understanding.